MacBook is more portable than the MacBook Pro.![]()
MBA is the most portable then.
Trick is, it's not $1000. It's $500. Now that's not chump change, but as noted, you do get:
a better (IMO) keyboard,
Then the answer is to make the MacBook Pro even better, not to cripple the MacBook.If they can squash them into a MacBook at no extra cost, then sure, but that does blurs the line between the models and shorten the exclusive feature list of "higher end" products, so I'd hope they too either see new tweaks or their pricetags are lowered as a result.
Maybe the rest of the industry is offering EVEN MORE each revision for the same price, so the MacBook Pros are actually getting more expensive.Turns out, they're actually getting cheaper. Or rather, they're constantly offering more each revision for the same price. So I don't know how you came to that conclusion.
Not too expensive. Too hot. 45 W compared to 35 W. (And BTW, it's the X9100. Q9100 is 2.27 GHz quad-core.)3.06GHz is Intel Core 2 Extreme Q9100, which is $851 (in lots of 1000). Too expensive, I believe, for a laptop, unless they come down in price at some point.
Not anymore it isn't.Right; and still the MBP is the laptop running Vista fastest.
Just read in a german magazine, that Dell and HP already advertised some of their coming high-end-notebooks as "quad-core" but with no more information. that's way before Intel wanted to introduce the new mobile quadcores. I bet that IF apple is going to release new MBs and MBPs this fall, at least two of the three MBPs will sport this new Intel quad-core. The Dell-machine, by the way, mentioned in the german article is said to hold up to 16 GB of memory...
check this: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Mobiler-Vierkernprozessor-von-Intel-aufgetaucht--/meldung/114177
Then the answer is to make the MacBook Pro even better, not to cripple the MacBook.
Not too expensive. Too hot. 45 W compared to 35 W.
(And BTW, it's the X9100. Q9100 is 2.27 GHz quad-core.)
Not everyone is inclined to drop a extra grand for dedicated graphics, another 2 inches of screen space, and a metal casing/different keyboard.
Hardware wise, you can buy PC's that are equal to or are greater than a Mac (hardware wise, not software, that is opinion) for a equal price or less.
Apple lags behind PC makers with hardware specs.
Dude, you buy a MacBook which is a 1000 dollar + laptop and you don't even get a third USB port. Enough said...
but okay, but basically thats alll the pro has over the macbook, i only thing your most likely gonna get is the muti-touch , because the macbook never had backlighting nor dedicated graphics cause it's a consumer laptops and most comsumer laptops dont get these things. i mean you cant expect them to make the consumer laptop better than the pro, then the MBP sales will drop, cause i can get a macbook that is better that the mbp
Then the MacBook Pro just has to get better. Surely if the MacBook can be upgraded to MacBook Pro specs, the MacBook Pro can be so much better.but okay, but basically thats alll the pro has over the macbook, i only thing your most likely gonna get is the muti-touch , because the macbook never had backlighting nor dedicated graphics cause it's a consumer laptops and most comsumer laptops dont get these things. i mean you cant expect them to make the consumer laptop better than the pro, then the MBP sales will drop, cause i can get a macbook that is better that the mbp
And a high-res (1440*900) display would be nice too.I don't think anyone would be silly enough to ask that the MB be given better specs than the Pro. However we would like the option of a dedicated GPU in the MB, like an 8400 (which is significantly less powerful than the GPU in the Pros).
Given that quad-core offers little to no performance increase over dual-cores costing less than a third of that, it's highly unlikely MB/MBPs would find any buyers at the price Apple would have to charge.
The keyboard on IBM laptops (I still can't say the word "Lenovo") is very nice and lends itself well to fast and accurate typing.What keyboard do you want to have on the MacBook? iBook G4's?
Sure, I wouldn't mind that.
Just read in a german magazine, that Dell and HP already advertised some of their coming high-end-notebooks as "quad-core" but with no more information. that's way before Intel wanted to introduce the new mobile quadcores. I bet that IF apple is going to release new MBs and MBPs this fall, at least two of the three MBPs will sport this new Intel quad-core. The Dell-machine, by the way, mentioned in the german article is said to hold up to 16 GB of memory...
check this: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Mobiler-Vierkernprozessor-von-Intel-aufgetaucht--/meldung/114177
Bonjour, I am in need to buy a portable tablet to make illustrations and animation on the road. Should I buy the modbook which has excellent review and hot in all around , but has in my opinion not a very strong computer inside, not very up-to-date ( no dual-core or quad-core , etc ) or wait and expect mac to release a new itablet or macpro touch portable with a sensitive stylus ?
itablet? macpro touch portable??? WHAT?
Buy the product that exists would be my advice there.
Axiotron Modbook - http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook
uhh... yeah. that. thanks for agreeing?![]()
I had intended on adding an actual thought to that post...but got pulled away and submitted it w/osorry for any confusion...
Would it make sense for Apple to transition the MacBook from plastic to not aluminium but titanium? I kind of miss the titanium PowerBooks.
In this era, it would be:
Aluminium: Pro
Titanium: Consumer
That would be interesting. Another question, would you say Titanium is more environmentally friendly than Plastic?
can it block wi-fi ?