ok so we've heard one side saying Ipods are perfect another side saying they ar scratch magnets....what possibly more is their to discuss? no one is gonna budge on the topic..shouldnt this thread be locked or something?
matticus008 said:This is absolutely ridiculous. If nothing else, people should take away two things from this discussion:
1. There is ZERO relationship between money paid and resistance to wear, unless you are paying a premium specifically for increased protection. There is no magical shield produced by a higher dollar count.
MacTruck said:This is the only thing you can do to a new ipod to save it from the scratches. Leave the plastic coating on it, put it in a Speck Toughskin, then put it into a protective acrylic case. I'm still trying to figure out how to turn it on and use it though.
![]()
crazycongas24 said:Your quite hilarious. Until this happens to you. Oh, but I forgot, it's extremely enjoyable to watch videos through a scratched/clouded screen. You act as if I'm gaining something by telling my case. As if I don't already own 7 other Apple products.
absurdio said:Glad to hear it. How long have you had it?
Don't call people out. It doesn't lead anywhere good for you.Scratchpod said:Those of you who complain that their aren't any posted pics can now take your seat. Those of you who complain that the scratching issue is made up or "horribly exaggerated" as Matticus put it, you can also take your seat. The amount of concerned posters speaks for itself. If your happy with yours then great! Start a thread on how much you love your Ipod. I, on the other hand, would like to see some action taken on the part of Apple to reconcile this issue.
matticus008 said:Don't call people out. It doesn't lead anywhere good for you.
So there's now one picture of a significantly scuffed (or possibly just smudged) iPod screen. Okay. But do you really expect a reasonable person to look at that and believe that it was caused by the case without abnormal pressure or extenuating circumstances? Even if your answer is yes (and I don't think that can be), does this one picture justify your ridiculously overblown claims of pandemic scratching?
You are right, though. The numbers do speak for themselves. 53,000 members here, and a few dozen complaints. Almost 3 million nano and 5G owners, and a handful of pictures (including the laughable content of nanoscratch.com), of which only this one looks to be damaged, and not even a scratch per se, but a wide scuff which implies roughly simultaneous pressure over a large area. That's not a patchwork of scratches like you've been complaining about, but what instead appears to be a single traumatic event.
No, I didn't call you out by name and flaunt a "what now? just sit down" post with it. The "severe harm" and "flaw" really do only exist in your head. It simply fails to translate to demonstrated reality.Scratchpod said:Hey, you called me out first! Below incase you've forgotten.
Thread views don't mean anything. Most of them are from members catching up or posting. And even if they're not, they are very easily people curious about the news. It doesn't give you any support or allow you to draw any conclusions. Only voiced complaints give you any sort of standing in a plaintiff-burden society. It's obviously not a serious issue if people don't care about it.Over 16,000 people have viewed this thread. How did they find this thread? Probably by Googling "Scratched Video Ipod," So I am assuming most of those people are experiencing the same problems.
It probably would, because that's an exaggerated claim that would stir up all kinds of trouble. No one ever said the iPod was scratch resistant, and that's a big part of the whole point here. Further, there is no universal best material known to man, but for the practical, structural, and aesthetic decisions of the iPod, polycarbonate fits the bill better than anything else. No, it's not perfect, but nothing is. Can you point out another problem? Didn't think so. I think with all objective analysis, the severity of this problem is greatly overrated, but of course it is, because when it's all you can find to complain about, you gotta swing hard.You should start a thread about how the Ipod is scratch resistant and made of the best material known to man. I bet you won't get 16,000 views....
matticus008 said:It probably would, because that's an exaggerated claim that would stir up all kinds of trouble. No one ever said the iPod was scratch resistant, and that's a big part of the whole point here. Further, there is no universal best material known to man, but for the practical, structural, and aesthetic decisions of the iPod, polycarbonate fits the bill better than anything else. No, it's not perfect, but nothing is. Can you point out another problem? Didn't think so. I think with all objective analysis, the severity of this problem is greatly overrated, but of course it is, because when it's all you can find to complain about, you gotta swing hard.
matticus008 said:So there's now one picture of a significantly scuffed (or possibly just smudged) iPod screen. Okay. But do you really expect a reasonable person to look at that and believe that it was caused by the case without abnormal pressure or extenuating circumstances?
I have no doubt that you treated your iPod well and that you do believe that the scuff came from nowhere. I don't think you attempted to deceive anyone. But it remains fairly obvious that something particular happened to your iPod to cause that kind of damage. Your scuff is not consistent with the stories other people have been posting.crazycongas24 said:You act as if we are all anti-iPod posters whom are doing this just to spite Apple.