I've never understood people who feel the need to be nasty just to register a disagreement. What a sad way to live.
Though IF you're going to be nasty, you might try to have your own post make even a tiny bit of sense. I'm talking about a single company relying on its own R&D, not one company relying on the R&D of an industry competitor. If you think otherwise, you completely misread my post.
AND, you might also try to look at all of the meaningful numbers rather than just cherry-picked ones.
First, you don't know how much of that R&D is iPhone, so that's a pretty meaningless number. We know, for example, that apple still pours R&D money into iPads, watches, Siri, AR, a self-driving car project, and probably a lot more we don't know about.
But second, and even more importantly, if your contention is that Apple needs to raise iPhone prices to account for R&D, let's compare iPhone sales in 2007 to 2016. The answer?
1.4M vs 201M.
Meaning that in the same time that Apple's global R&D (not just iPhone) has increased 12.6x, iPhone sales have increased 143.5x.
So please, explain how a 143.5x sales increase fails to cover a 12.6x R&D increase such that they need to raise iPhone prices as much as they have.
Edit: I used 2007 because that's what you used, but 2008 would probably make more sense, since the iPhone was only on sale for half of 2007. In 2008, Apple sold approximately 11.5M iPhones, which still means iPhone sales have gone up 17.5x from 2008-2016, still outpacing R&D, though not by nearly as much as 2007 would make it seem.