Well....the GOLDEN RULE of most forum is if you don't like the title just stay away don't participate, no one is forcing you to contribute. Nothing personal is asked on my thread so i am not sure where you heading at. Although , i appreciate your contribution, even your critics.
Words capitalised equate to shouting, methinks.
No-one is forcing me to contribute, agreed.
Moreover, I am rather taken with the food and drink threads on these fora and frequent them regularly.
I suppose that what bothers me a little both nature of your responses to some of the post (not least requesting or demanding more information than people may wish to volunteer) and I am also struck by the somewhat defensive tone taken in your responses.
Re the actual thread, skipping breakfast depends on personal circumstances (such as whether you are a morning person or not), professional circumstances (commutes, having to give talks, or forms of a professional life where early morning activities are less demanding), actual culture (some cultures eat breakfast together, while others don't), and changing natures of societies - some eat breakfast en route to work, or when they arrive.
And - even now - many in western societies take long, leisurely breakfasts - which sometimes become brunch - at week-ends with family. Good restaurants have made reputations on being able to offer such things.
What, you don't consider asking people what they consume for breakfast or if they even consume anything first thing in their day a personal question? Seems to me that what someone chooses to eat or not eat (or drink) for their first "meal" of the day is pretty darned personal......
Why do you care about this, what difference does this make to you what someone else eats or doesn't eat or drink when they first begin their day? What is your real interest?
That will make this thread invalid then.....
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/what-is-was-for-dinner.2133151/
Mmmmm..interesting very interesting.
[doublepost=1557634812][/doublepost]Regrettably some falks are trying to hijack and kill the thread i am not sure why.
If people happily replied to the thread then it becomes none of your business, with respect to......
[doublepost=1557634957][/doublepost]You happily replied to my thread on page 2 then started to criticize me why i posted? It doesn't make sense at all.
Nobody is trying to kill the thread; that is a complete over-reaction.
However, they are pointing out that some of your responses to an interesting could be considered in a less benign light, as in excessively intrusive and seeking more (personal) information than people may be willing to divulge.
In other words, your thread focusses on the personal, not the wider issue (the transformed nature of breakfast) - which is a matter of interest
Permit me to ask a question of you:
Do you believe that how western society treats or views breakfast has changed over the past 50 years, and, if so, why?