Been doing a lot of reading, watching and playing with the Pixel. My opinion is Google with the Pixel nailed it. Has the potential to be equal with the iPhone.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Is that why the iPhone 7/7+ is the THIRD iteration of the iPhone 6/6+ series?Apple is still creating innovative products that millions of people use, and want to continue using.
It's your opinion, this is a S year and we are getting the same old design with some new more fancy colors and updated internals (I myself am waiting for iPhone 7S Plus in jet White)I think this will be a good year for the iPhone and ready for new changes.
My opinion is a whole new design is coming. Apple certainly needs to stray away from the previous design with the iPhone 6/6s/7 if they want to stay relevant. I'm confident the iPhone 8 will be a big change.
Is that why the iPhone 7/7+ is the THIRD iteration of the iPhone 6/6+ series?
Or are you speaking solely of internal changes?
It is more important to me that they look new at least every two years. Lots of people buy their devices around here based on specs. Better CPU, camera, more ram, etc, etc.Is it more important to look drastically new ever year or perform better? I think they look nice and perform awesome.
It's your opinion, this is a S year and we are getting the same old design with some new more fancy colors and updated internals (I myself am waiting for iPhone 7S Plus in jet White)
Your post is evidence of what I just posted.Is that why the iPhone 7/7+ is the THIRD iteration of the iPhone 6/6+ series?
Or are you speaking solely of internal changes?
OK.Your post is evidence of what I just posted.
My previous post was speaking of (albeit it in brevity) Apple's innovation in all areas (over time). Just because some people have placed their own perceived timeline and type of innovation on Apple and expected it to be thus and thus, that doesn't mean that Apple has failed to bring innovation and improvement of product. It simply means that the person placing such personal (and ill-placed expectations read: logical fallacy) on Apple was disappointed. And many times, said persons rail against Apple for not meeting those personal and ill-placed timelines.
I've had a Pixel for 2.5 months and here's my experience thus far:Been doing a lot of reading, watching and playing with the Pixel. My opinion is Google with the Pixel nailed it. Has the potential to be equal with the iPhone.
Anyone else have an opinion?
If one is buying a product based solely on looks, and is placing his or her own expectation on a company, and then getting disappointed or angry at the company when his or her expectations are not met each time, one is going to be constantly disappointed and it isn't the fault of Apple or any other company.OK.
My 2013 Sentra is an improvement and innovation over the 2012 model year by that standard. Because Nissan changed the body style in 2013.
But park a 2012 Sentra (which I used to own) next to a 2007 Sentra and you will have to look hard to see 'innovation' because Nissan didn't change the body style for five years.
I can recognize innovation in internals. But claiming innovation and releasing it in the same body style every year (6/6s/7) is not my idea of innovation.
Which does not mean I think you're wrong. I just don't share your viewpoint.
Is that why the iPhone 7/7+ is the THIRD iteration of the iPhone 6/6+ series?
Or are you speaking solely of internal changes?
LOL! You sound like the perfect customer for the Pontiac Aztec!If one is buying a product based solely on looks, and is placing his or her own expectation on a company, and then getting disappointed or angry at the company when his or her expectations are not met each time, one is going to be constantly disappointed and it isn't the fault of Apple or any other company.
In my opinion, a person with the aforementioned thought process is the one to blame for his or her own disappointment of product.
The expectation was set by Apple. For what I can remember they have done two iterations of a phone and then a new design.If one is buying a product based solely on looks, and is placing his or her own expectation on a company, and then getting disappointed or angry at the company when his or her expectations are not met each time, one is going to be constantly disappointed and it isn't the fault of Apple or any other company.
In my opinion, a person with the aforementioned thought process is the one to blame for his or her own disappointment of product.
I just re-upped again with apple haha. I upgraded to the 7 Plus and MacBook Pro. Apple still is number one when it comes to hardware + software cohesion. Samsung Amy have the hardware and google may have the software, but they aren't one cohesive unit such as the iPhone, iOS, iCloud, etc.
Apple is innovating each time (in many ways). It is as I said, many people placing their own expectation of what they would do if they were Apple, or what they think Apple should do each release, and then getting disappointed or angry with Apple, or trotting out the 'innovation with Apple' rhetoric. Time and time again said persons are disappointed and they can't understand that the disappointment comes from their own logical fallacy.The expectation was set by Apple. For what I can remember they have done two iterations of a phone and then a new design.
3G, 3GS
4, 4s
5, 5s
6, 6s, 7
So it's not wrong for people to have expected a new design for the 7 as Apple set those expectations with their past release history.
I think the problem lies more in the fact that everyone else is moving forward while Apple isn't doing anything new in hardware design. I'll give you an example -- the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge came out last year. That was on an S-year for the iPhone as the iPhone 6 redesign had only happened a year prior. Fast-forward to now -- the supposed redesign year (given Apple's tick-tock redesign cycle) and Apple is STILL using the same design. And the added features for the iPhone 7 (save for the dual camera) were just playing catch-up to what other manufacturers are doing.Apple is innovating each time (in many ways). It is as I said, many people placing their own expectation of what they would do if they were Apple, or what they think Apple should do each release, and then getting disappointed or angry with Apple, or trotting out the 'innovation with Apple' rhetoric. Time and time again said persons are disappointed and they can't understand that the disappointment comes from their own logical fallacy.
In my opinion, it would be much better for a consumer to not invoke logical fallacy with Apple (or any other business). See product for what it is at that moment in time, not through the mental lense of what I have been speaking of. In that light, a person is better able to assess whether or not a product will meet his or her needs at that moment in time.
AH!Apple is innovating each time (in many ways). It is as I said, many people placing their own expectation of what they would do if they were Apple, or what they think Apple should do each release, and then getting disappointed or angry with Apple, or trotting out the 'innovation with Apple' rhetoric. Time and time again said persons are disappointed and they can't understand that the disappointment comes from their own logical fallacy.
In my opinion, it would be much better for a consumer to not invoke logical fallacy with Apple (or any other business). See product for what it is at that moment in time, not through the mental lense of what I have been speaking of. In that light, a person is better able to assess whether or not a product will meet his or her needs at that moment in time.