Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Who does a better keyboard in software? Just curious as I really would like to know...

The HTC Touch, hands down. The iPhone is good and very learnable, but the one on this device is a lot easier to type on.

If not, and you are older and maturer, then please act like it for the benefit of us all. :rolleyes:

Yep, that's me. My list of complaints may not be stuck at "three or four" either, but Apple managed to hit most of the right notes for my purposes at a price point I could comprehend and accept.

Having a great selection of "all my stuff" with me plus camera, phone and net access in that small box with so few hardware keys is still so amazing to me. I am as awestruck today as I was last June 29th when I unboxed the thing and began to understand what Apple had created for us.

So while I have my small collection of complaints and a wishlist, no one could ever mistake me for an unbiased critic of the iPhone. I am an unabashed admirer of the people who designed, engineered, manufactured and rolled out the hardware and software for Rev A of this device. It has represented a huge advance in making telecommunications and personal computing more portable and especially more flexible. Perfect, of course not. Fantastic, yes indeed.

This post is actually insightful. Like I said (and the young boys/girls didn't read) the iPhone is great, but not perfect. The fact the the SDK isn't even out yet shows that the software side of the device is lacking, while the competitions isn't.

By the time Apple catches up in June, there will be a few more phones that compete with the Touch features of the iPhone, and like many other competing devices they may not be as good as the Apple product, but they will offer that one or two things that Apple doesn't.

I hope the other posters get over themselves. ;)
 
The iPhone is a nice first run, and people caught on to it because it's an Apple product that offered the software for touch (not the touch screen, just the software to base the entire phone on touch) but when it comes to phones in it's league it was average as best and failed in many areas....
If it is "average as best and failed in many areas", how is it that iPhone owners consistently rate the iPhone the highest in satisfaction?

IMO, it'd have to be "great at best" to overcome "failed in many areas" (virtually all of the customer satisfaction reports show that owners are quick to talk about things on the iPhone that they feel need to be improved) in order to average out to be the top of the pack satisfaction wise.

http://www.google.com/search?q=iphone+owner+satisfaction

Also IMO, your "young boys and girls" and "maturer" comments aren't any more respectful (or less insulting) than what was said to you.
 
from reading forums, and reports from friends, practically every iPhone I hear about has had some sort of fault, serious enough for it to be returned and replaced.

a) Your sample is biased because people who have issues tend to be noiser than those who are content.
b) Your statement can't be 100% true because there are people even in this very thread who have phones that never needed to be replaced.

So my question: Is the iPhone a substandard product?

I don't own one, so I won't answer the question directly. BUT, cell phones are very complicated little devices, and Apple is not a cell phone company. I think the iPhone would be a really impressive phone coming from any company, but coming from a company that doesn't have any experience at all building phones -- that's nothing short of amazing.

It's imperfect; but think about how many years those other companies have been making phones. They've gotten really efficient at it. Give the iphone a few more revisions and it will get as close to perfect as any other phone that's currently out there.
 
following on from savar.
apple have sold more than 5 million iphones already (apparently)

and yet at MOST there are about 200 reports on this website about iphones being replaced.
out of about 5000 iphones owned by people on this forum?

you work out the percentage.
im not saying that there were ONLY 200 iphones in the world that needed replacing, but that is the sample that i pick up from here.
compare it to windows CE

or samsungs first phone. how did they go about entering the phone market?
was it revolutionary?
 
The HTC Touch, hands down. The iPhone is good and very learnable, but the one on this device is a lot easier to type on.

Just occured to me - the IM patent a few weeks back - didn't it show both styles of predictive text (available list of words given by the entered letters so far, and also most likely word given the letters entered so far)?
 
Uh, I actually didn't say anything that insulting (like the infowar guy did), just to spend some time outside of your own head; because your "location" is set to "Primarily In My Head". I obviously touched a nerve though...

The iPhone IS a great device, but not as great as the fanboys/girls (yourself) think it is.... start thinking and stop assuming.

http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /...n-rim-palm-smartphones-selling-like-hotcakes/

Especially in Europe, where I the consumer are much smarter it seems....

http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/iphone.html

http://www.umpcportal.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=751

Stop being so brash and start discussing the topic please. :rolleyes:

Just occured to me - the IM patent a few weeks back - didn't it show both styles of predictive text (available list of words given by the entered letters so far, and also most likely word given the letters entered so far)?

It might, and it would be very welcomed. Having XT9 on a screen as big as the iPhone's would be amazing for anyone with big fingers, or that has to type quickly. As I said, the improvement that Apple will be putting into the 3G version of the phone will make it a bit more worthwhile for many that have been sitting on the fence.

There are a lot of people that are facing persecution because we want to see a good product become better.
 
ok, i do love my iphone, but i've never had another phone thats has so many faults. I'm currently on my third. My friend Brian is on his fourth. Another friend who i persuaded to get an iPhone on the basis of how amazing it is had to get a replacement after his THIRD week. It really isn't good enough. This is supposed to be a premium device. If there's a few random hiccups, that fair enough, but this amount of eff ups is a bit ridiculous, non?

To go a little on the other side...I have a co-worker that purchased his 4gb iPhone on iDay and he is still using the same one. I convinced another co-worker to buy one 5 months ago and he is on the same one. I purchased my original on iDay and had it replaced a week later due to wifi connection problem and poor battery performance. Since I recieved the new one I have had zero problems and everything has worked perfectly so with that in mind, I disagree with your assement. Tech stuff is finicky and with as many different hands in the pie...you should expect a certain amount of issues and problems. Go on any piece of tec equipement forums and you will see the same type of threads, over and over again. Satisfied users, Basic everyday users are not even going to bother with forums of this type and could care less about reporting that everything is hunky dory!
 
If it is "average as best and failed in many areas", how is it that iPhone owners consistently rate the iPhone the highest in satisfaction?

IMO, it'd have to be "great at best" to overcome "failed in many areas" (virtually all of the customer satisfaction reports show that owners are quick to talk about things on the iPhone that they feel need to be improved) in order to average out to be the top of the pack satisfaction wise.

http://www.google.com/search?q=iphone+owner+satisfaction

Also IMO, your "young boys and girls" and "maturer" comments aren't any more respectful (or less insulting) than what was said to you.

Noting that much of this thread is opinion based, one would have to ask what's the point?

I understand that customer satisfaction reports are skewed, which is why the much of the info concerning Apple products will be skewed by the hype that Apple produces and the well known reality distortion field that Jobs turns on for any product.

It's okay to be satisfied with every Apple product ever made no matter what, but it's also okay to find fault or not be satisfied with a certain Apple product as well, which many at Mac Rumors posters seem to disagree with.

p.s. I am glad that you feel that my "young boys and girls" and "maturer" comments aren't any more respectful (or less insulting) than what was said to me, but calling some one an "idiot" on a civil forum IS imature and the nature of younger people no matter what you think.
 
ok, i do love my iphone, but i've never had another phone thats has so many faults. I'm currently on my third. My friend Brian is on his fourth. Another friend who i persuaded to get an iPhone on the basis of how amazing it is had to get a replacement after his THIRD week. It really isn't good enough. This is supposed to be a premium device. If there's a few random hiccups, that fair enough, but this amount of eff ups is a bit ridiculous, non?

maybe you've been getting them from a dodgy batch fromn the apple store or distribution warehouse or wherever it came from. Mines been perfect so I have no complaints
 
There are a lot of people that are facing persecution because we want to see a good product become better.
You are not "facing persecution", you are being taken to task for the unpleasant tone you have adopted towards several posters, and rightly so. If you cannot make your point without insulting others, is it worth making?
 
Oh, you didn't touch a nerve my child, as I said, you're the one not adding much to the conversation besides your simple comments.

Actually, spending time outside of your own fanboy head will lead you to understand that not everything with the Apple logo is gold...

Do some research on the web and stop thinking that everyone agrees with fanboys like yourself because you seem to be the loudest or wittiest.

The iPhone IS a great device, but not as great as the fanboys/girls (yourself) think it is.... start thinking and stop assuming.
There are a lot of people that are facing persecution because we want to see a good product become better.

Has your status changed Digital Skunk? I seem to recall a month or so ago when you were degrading my posts that you didn't even own an iPhone. Over the months your posts have been more degrading then most and I have to agree with skunk. You seem to take offense at anyone that posts anything derogartory to yours and then you start getting nasty. Look at your own history. And "IF" you still do not own an iPhone, then you can validate nothing other then what others are saying so it invalidates your opinion. If you can stand the heat....stay out of the kitchen.
 
I understand that customer satisfaction reports are skewed, which is why the much of the info concerning Apple products will be skewed by the hype that Apple produces and the well known reality distortion field that Jobs turns on for any product.
I don't agree with your attempt to white-wash iPhone customer satisfaction surveys as "skewed".

Virtually all of the surveys mention specific areas of the iPhone that customers [have fault with, aren't satisifed with, wish to be improved].

Is it not a valid possibility for you that despite multiple areas that iPhone owners wish to be improved, the majority are genuinely satisfied with the iPhone --- without being under some sort of Steve Jobs mass mind control???

It's okay to be satisfied with every Apple product ever made no matter what, but it's also okay to find fault or not be satisfied with a certain Apple product as well, which many at Mac Rumors posters seem to disagree with.

The biggest disagreement I see in this thread is that your message (i.e. the iPhone is good, but could be better) is lost because of the tone you've used in most of your posts.

If you haven't noticed, quite a few of the replies your posts have generated have dealt with the tone of your posts, not your actual thoughts.

p.s. I am glad that you feel that my "young boys and girls" and "maturer" comments aren't any more respectful (or less insulting) than what was said to me, but calling some one an "idiot" on a civil forum IS imature and the nature of younger people no matter what you think.
The end result of you complaining about a specific behavior and then behaving that way yourself is nothing positive. If you really want to effect a change on the thread, lead by example.
 
Well, it was expensive, but overall worth it. However, if I bought 3 iPhones, I'd be a little upset i couldn't directly call jesus or use it as a time machine / toaster oven :D. So, yeah. 3 iphones, hm. :rolleyes:
 
You are not "facing persecution", you are being taken to task for the unpleasant tone you have adopted towards several posters, and rightly so. If you cannot make your point without insulting others, is it worth making?

I am not talking about just myself, I am talking about anyone that makes any statement to the contrary. Most members don't say anything negative about the phone because of things like this that will happen.

As for tone, what do I sound like over there. Honestly I think it's the way people are reading it. Maybe some members just want someone to sound nasty to them, I wasn't the first person to throw out the word "idiot" now was I?


I checked the all the posts that you have made, I only posted in one thread sans this one and I was the last person to post there. I don't understand what you are talking about.

And considering I was NOT the one who called you that, why the hell do you keep singling ME out as the fanboy here!?...

Sorry, so very sorry, I just click the quote button. I really didn't see that as a joke. But now I see. I wasn't calling the iPhone a polished turd, and the 80% referred to the Mac Rumors community and ALL Apple products. The turd comment went with Apple's marketing. If Apple makes it sound like gold then people will take it as gold if they fall into the marketing trap. Much like any product. Keyboards on phone were clunky, but NO ONE swore against them until the iPhone came out, and that okay... but the iPhone keyboard isn't end all be all.

I may sound like an HTC Touch fanboy, but the only thing I consider to be superior is the keyboard, check out my posts. Much of the rest of the phone is mediocre or sucks when not including the network. The most you will find me talking about is the keyboard and the EVDO and the software.

The device runs Windows Mobile, and crashes constantly.

As for the comment about owning an iPhone...(a) what does it matter, (b) posters proved that to not matter months ago... how many times will that have to be said on internet forums to be shot down again and again as a simple argument. No one owned the Air before they bashed it am I correct? And no one owned the iPhone before it came out for people to form opinions of it.

How many products have you formed opinions about without having owned?

For those that need more insight into the attitudes of some members, check out any thread where someone supports Microsoft Windows and see how many sensible posters get pulled down into the world of fanaticism before they just give up on reasoning to some people and leave.

If you think I am condescending then you really have to look up the definition of the word.... as I stated before, I didn't throw the first stone.
 

It's okay, I have changed my "TONE"... I will try to put more smileys in my thread next time.

As for the skewed survey's, I find that much of the info done by the originators to be skewed no matter what product.

Doing a search could lead one to believe that 3G sucks, or 3G rocks. Microsoft will survey MS users on product satisfaction, so forth.

I agree with what you said, and the surveys that I read agree with my statements about what needs to be improved on the iPhone.

I hope that a lot of members are searching for, "Why I didn't buy an iPhone" stories/blogs/posts, and trying a little harder to understand that many people don't own the iPhone for solid reasons.
 
(in addition, ALL of my non-iPhone loving friends have cited no MMS, bad camera and lack of bluetooth connectivity as main reasons not to get an iPhone)

They would, but then again, I don't understand why some people get all hot and bothered over MMS. I've had MMS-capable phones for the last three years and I have never sent a picture messge, not once. Not a single solitary time :D I just couldn't find a case where I couldn't do the job more comfortably, elegantly, or cheaply by some other means, like email or transferring the file straight to the person's computer or even facebook like somebody mentioned above--imageshack too. Neither have I received one, even though most of my contacts had MMS phones too. I never found an occasion that would justify the extra money they cost, or the cramped wee screen for looking at the picture.

It could be just me since I'll admit I'm not much into cellphones, but it would seem that this is one of the technologies that acted like a bridge between two much better technologies--a bit like APS film was somewhat handier for family snapshot type photographers than 35 mm film, but still nowhere as practical for them as digital which came along a little later and swept the market segment where APS used to be. That's what I think MMS sounds like: a little bit extra compared to SMS, but nowhere as good as emailing straight from the phone.

Plus, I don't see why they think the camera sucks. Sure, no flash, and no more than 2 MP, but it simply takes great pictures for a phone camera--better than some I've seen with 3MP. Also, it has a wide range of light sensitivity, which means it can cope with fairly low lighting without need for a flash. I tested it in conditions where my separate 3MP digital point-and-shoot would definitely have needed flash to cope and it just took it in its stride. I mean, I'm a photography geek who only shoots 35mm film in an SLR for anything more serious than posting something on an online forum, and I wouldn't mind a camera like the iphone's around with me, seriously. So it don't shoot video, so what? Sitting there in your little corner trying to do a video of the party or big moment means you lose the best moments of it anyway, so even when I had it I never used it; much better to have memories of an event than to experience it on camera for the first time even though you were there.

about Bluetooth though, I don't know I thought it had that, at least for a bluetooth headset thingy. As for transferring files, even if it's got that, don't see why you'd want to use it; it takes forever to sync that way, just go ahead and use the USB 2.0 things, and the way the market's crawling with retractable cables which are tiny, you don't even have to carry some big snake of a cable for it. Just get one for each bag or for home and work or whatever. again, with my previous phone which had full bluetooth connectivity, I only transferred ONE song that way. the rest I just USB'd. Life's too short lol
 
They would, but then again, I don't understand why some people get all hot and bothered over MMS. I've had MMS-capable phones for the last three years and I have never sent a picture messge, not once. Not a single solitary time I just couldn't find a case where I couldn't do the job more comfortably, elegantly, or cheaply by some other means, like email or transferring the file straight to the person's computer or even facebook like somebody mentioned above--imageshack too. Neither have I received one, even though most of my contacts had MMS phones too. I never found an occasion that would justify the extra money they cost, or the cramped wee screen for looking at the picture.

I for one used MMS daily. Even thou, I knew the iPhone didn't have it, I still purchased the iPhone. What I didn't realize was how bad I would miss it. Sorry, but having to go to a freaking website to look up a picture someone sent you is rediculas IMHO.

On the iPhone, the screen is not cramped! :)
 
Just a quick moderator note:
Let's try to cut out the personal bickering, folks. Insults, name-calling, impugning of maturity/intelligence, etc. has no place here at MacRumors.

If you have issues with someone's posts, report them so that the moderation crew can take care of it. Thanks :)
 
As for tone, what do I sound like over there. Honestly I think it's the way people are reading it. Maybe some members just want someone to sound nasty to them, I wasn't the first person to throw out the word "idiot" now was I?

Nor was I, but I sure got blasted for it by you and one whole post deleted by the mods from this thread (not really fair since, again, didn't say anything that harsh) which, apparently, you responded to below...

Sorry, so very sorry, I just click the quote button. I really didn't see that as a joke. But now I see. I wasn't calling the iPhone a polished turd, and the 80% referred to the Mac Rumors community and ALL Apple products. The turd comment went with Apple's marketing. If Apple makes it sound like gold then people will take it as gold if they fall into the marketing trap. Much like any product. Keyboards on phone were clunky, but NO ONE swore against them until the iPhone came out, and that okay... but the iPhone keyboard isn't end all be all.

I may sound like an HTC Touch fanboy, but the only thing I consider to be superior is the keyboard, check out my posts. Much of the rest of the phone is mediocre or sucks when not including the network. The most you will find me talking about is the keyboard and the EVDO and the software.

Fair enough. And I do agree with you on those points.

If you think I am condescending then you really have to look up the definition of the word.... as I stated before, I didn't throw the first stone.

condescending |ˌkändəˈsendi ng |
adjective
acting in a way that betrays a feeling of patronizing superiority


Well, I know exactly what that word means and you did come off that way... but forums are sometimes easy to misinterpret by us all. And as I have stated before, nor did I cast the first stone, but your tone, however, seemed to by many others. But thanks for clarifying.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

As for the original topic of this thread, I do agree that sometimes there is an RDF affect when it comes to Apple products (especially with Apple more so than other companies) and that some people will claim Apple can do no wrong, but at the same time there is a justified reason for this fanboyism (heh, now that I deny that I am a fanboy, here I go defending them!); because the thing that Apple has always done [under Steve Jobs past and present] is a combination of several things:

1. Move forward with innovation. And I don't mean they invented everything. What I mean is they recognize a technology that is sitting in a research lab and are able to acquire it and produce it into a mass market product. Yes, fanboys say "See, Apple invented multitouch and the GUI and the Mouse and..." but no, I've always said as many others have, that Apple is great at taking what someone else has been developing and then are able to get it out to market in a refined and polished way. And they usually do this by buying up the people and/or companies involved with the research in the first place... they absorb them into Apple much like the Borg! (and before people start assuming things again, no I am NOT a Trekkie or Trekker, just thought that was an appropriate comparison.)

2. Design. For far too long most companies never placed any sort of emphasis on design, only engineering. But Apple and more importantly, Steve Jobs, have always known how important design is along side of engineering. When you put them on equal levels, hand and hand, you get products that are functional, elegant in their simplicity as well as a thing of beauty; the iPhone being a perfect example of this. Heck, this past CES show, even TV manufacturing companies were saying they finally get what design is all about thanks to the iPhone, so now they are trying to make their Flat Screens look iPhoneish with chrome bevels and rounded edges. But that's NOT just what design is about.

3. The closed Ecosystem. Though it has been vilified by many for many years, as Steve Jobs says (and he always credits Alan Kay of Xerox PARC for this, you know, the inventor of the GUI and the mouse...) that if you are going to make great software you need to make your own hardware. And this is paramountly true with Apple products and is one of the reason Windows gets bashed so much. Think about it, the few Microsoft products that, despite their own shortcomings, get people really excited are the ones where Microsoft do both the hardware and software; the Xbox 360, the Zune and the [still not yet officially released] Surface.

It is these combination of things that help Apple not to make a substandard product for the most part. Even the products that have failed such as the Cube were not substandard. So in answer to the original post, is the iPhone a substandard product... far, far from it.
 

I agree on all parts, sans the condescending tone point of course... that word and fanboy get tossed around a lot regardless of what people say at times.... yes, call me a hypocrite whatever. The original stone that was thrown was deleted as well, not just mine, and the member was put in Time-Out for his comments, so mine weren't as negative as some may think. And I think everyone should just keep thier own personal opinions about members to themselves as the mods have stated, or PM the person you have the dispute with.

But those same reasons that Apple has for making good products, which they do, also put their products below the standard at times. Looking at Apple's choice in hardware for the MBP and iMac, or lack of a certain product is testiment to that fact.

Fanatic: a person with an obsessive interest in and enthusiasm for something.

These people usually can't get passed the idea that they are such, and there is no reason for fanaticism. That type of mentality leads to posts like the one on the second page of this thread.

The iPhone didn't have certain features on launch day, and still don't. They won't get them until June so everyone hopes and as long as those features are missing it will be a substandard product for a lot of people.

It's still based on opinion as I stated once before, this thread is filled with them. As one poster put it, it's based on what you need and what you want. If you don't care about mobile productivity then the iPhone is perfect, if you do then it's substandard.

As is the case with much of the world, this thread, and these products, if a slight majority's opinion is the same, they usually take their opinion as fact regardless of any other information.
 
I thought Surface was just deployed at a half dozen AT&T mainline stores around the country:

ATT uses Surface to compare phones

Oh, you're right. I was following the Surface's progress for quite awhile but finally gave up when, everyitme they were about to release it in a hotel lobby or something, they wouldn't... but didn't realize some stores may have them now. Has anyone actually seen it out in the wild yet?

As is the case with much of the world, this thread, and these products, if a slight majority's opinion is the same, they usually take their opinion as fact regardless of any other information.

Unfortunately, all too true.
 
The only couple of blahs i have about the iphone is that lag you get when reading email like it has to download it everytime you read it, and that I cant read email on it at all if I have no data connection.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.