makes me wonder why you got the MBP anyway? The specs. were still pretty close without the retool.
Fair point, and to be honest, I'm asking myself the same question now. It only gives even more weight to my former rant, though.
I guess, as I said before, hardware specs aren't much of an issue for me. Gigahertz, Megabytes... nice to have, but I seriously stopped caring about laptop performance years ago, at least for small, 10 to 20% increments as seen for processors between models now, for example. Nice to have, not need to have.
But it was
(was!) a factor. As I said, there are still "nice" upgrades in the MBP 13" version. There were even
more nice advantages before.
I could get incredible laptop hardware for half the price (and that "half the price" doesn't even strike me as much of an exaggeration) if I just got a Windows machine. But I still like Apple's design and functionality. So there are wholly different factors... The multi-touch trackpad... surprisingly huge deal for me... 7 hour battery... even bigger deal. On top of that I still get a lot of the minor, nice-to-have upgrades in hardware.
I'm not saying nobody in the world needs a MBP 13" right now. I'm pretty sure the differences are a huge deal for many (especially those missing the additional ports).
But look at Apples laptop range: You essentially got 4, maybe 4.5 model choices and minimal customization options (mostly regarding basic RAM, HD upgrades). So far, the increments made sense in a "best balance" way, but compare that to the dozens of options you get from other companies...
Enter 13" MB... suddenly, out of the 4 basic models (7 if you count the minimal hardware choices for the 13" and 15" MBP models... ) two are, by most reasonable standards,
identical! At the very least not nearly different enough to justify the hundreds of euros/dollars price differences. That's all I'm saying.
I just feel that, objectively, the MB 13"
can be called a "13" MBP killer". Not for everyone, but for most people, that's a fair statement.