I don't know if I think the watches themselves are overpriced. They are pricey, not sure if it's overpriced though. I do think the bands are overpriced which probably factors in to the cost of the overall watch price when purchased.
I fit into every single category of user that you described.The question of whether it is overpriced or not isn't a single truth - it depends on each user. For someone who gets tons of notifications every day and finds a quick glance at their watch to triage what does and doesn't need immediate attention and who uses it to then prioritize tasks, who is active and wants to keep on top of fitness targets, activity patterns, exercise and challenges, who has their iPhone in a location that is out of immediate reach or where picking up their phone to look at it would be an issue for any number of reasons, who likes a timepiece which is versatile in information delivery and is very customizable, who wants wrist-based glances at important information such as weather, local restaurants, walking directions etc, or who is simply a tech-junkie looking for a new and rather clever toy, then no, it's far from overpriced.
I think the SS is priced right, as long as they don't product refresh in less than 2 years, I think for the money people are spending to have them upgrade in anything less would be wrong.
I also feel like Apple is way off in their band pricing, 3rd Party bands are going to be the norm...
I agree with you on the price for the sport, but I wouldn't necessarily say they look cheap. Especially to the people who spent their hard earned cash on one, that's just cold. I know it's your opinion but have a little class!
Also, if a $400 watch doesn't come with sapphire, oh yea, it is overpriced.
Couldn't agree more!!!
We are talking about product dollar value specifically in this thread. I made this comment to an Apple Store employee at try-on and he agreed with me. But it was probably a 'yes man moment' and of course he would encourage me to go SS. I am not trying to offend anyone. It is my opinion as to whether it looks like a $400 product. And I simply don't think it does.
Does it offer more functionality than a Galaxy Gear or other such device. Yes. But the finish simply doesn't say $400 to me. And I personally think the Classic Buckle should be included on the SS at $600 with the Sport band offered separately but not as the SS base. A $600 SS watch should include the leather strap. Then offer the Modern Buckle at $650 or maybe $700 in BOTH the 38 and 42 mm sizes. The Leather Loop could also be priced at $650 or $700. Price the Milanese at $700 or $750. And price the Link at $800, $850 or $900.
And I am talking 42 prices on all those above. Not quoting two prices because of the 38/42 split. I think the band pricing is too escalated.
The value of something is determined by how much potential buyers are willing to pay for it. If the Apple Watch was overpriced sales would be slow. Given that production cannot keep up with demand shows that if anything the Apple Watch is underpriced.
Fair enough. And I like your pricing a lot better than Apples!! #
Let me put is this way.
I probably think it's over priced given it's realistic lifespan as a "Current" product.
Based on the supply they have and the demand the watches are clearly underpriced.
I am not sure if that is true. iPhone is also in high demand, we don't really see Apple raising the price on iPhone.
Yes it's overpriced.
I agree. The other watches last a very long time and is virtually the same. Apple watch will become obsolete. And Apple will have to update it every year, because other tech companies will produce better smartwatches if Apple doesn't....
I have no doubt that Apple will release new models in a year - it would be a poor business model given the nature of the tech industry that wasn't geared to planned obsolescence - but that isn't to say they will not update firmware, as they do in all their other iOS devices, to keep feeding users fixes, enhancements and upgrades.
I'd expect the current model to stay current in firmware terms for a couple of years or so, meaning that users will only miss out on new hardware features or design aesthetics for a while yet.
No, it's not. If it was overpriced it would not sell, by definition.