Because an old iMac isn't limited to pitiful resources like the 1st Gen iPhone and iPhone 3G
There, I fixed it for you. The iPhone 3G is just as pitiful as the first gen iPhone in terms of resources. Your argument is not valid.
Because an old iMac isn't limited to pitiful resources like the 1st Gen iPhone and iPhone 3G
There, I fixed it for you. The iPhone 3G is just as pitiful as the first gen iPhone in terms of resources. Your argument is not valid.
GPU wise, no. 3G is faster there.
What do you mean it is faster - in terms of downloading data on a 3G connection? Of course it will be ... have I missed the point?
GPU wise, no. 3G is faster there.
What do you mean it is faster - in terms of downloading data on a 3G connection? Of course it will be ... have I missed the point?
GPU != 3G X-Gold 608
It would run, but it would multi-task slowly and the OS wouldn't run that well... hence they won't support it on the Original and 3G.
I think it is time for the first gen owners to upgrade to something newer.
Needless to say my family members whom have my old iphones would need to upgrade. And they are still completely happy with the original phone. But I don't think they need OS 4.
I think Apple should only be obligated to support a phone for 2-3 years. Which is much longer than the average lifespan of a phone.
I don't know about you folks but before the iPhone I was getting a new phone every year. They all died on me, or looked soo old by the time the year was over.
Never insulted you. You said Apple was treating you like an idiot. I stated perhaps not acting like one would help. This did not imply you were one. It was simply a response to your comment. Whether or not you are one is not my judgment to make.![]()
Because that's too obvious a solution. Lol. When tech gets that old, you need to sell it before it rots away and you get nothing. Happens all the time.
It would run, but it would multi-task slowly and the OS wouldn't run that well... hence they won't support it on the Original and 3G.
Ding ding![]()
Nobody's asking for the first gen to get multitasking. They just want OS 4 on their fully capable device that has identical specs as the 3G.
I am not really into the debate anymore but something obviously isn't the same on both of those phones for one to be much slower than the other. Can anyone explain that? Why is the 2G so much slower if it's identical to the 3G?
Bat Commander-
If you were Steve Jobs, when would you end support for the 2G phone? Not asking for an argument or anything. I am just curious to hear when YOU think it's a good time to end support for the 2G. Now? Next year? What would you do?
The iPhone "2G" isn't slower than the iPhone 3G. They run exactly the same. I have BOTH. I have no life so I've gone and even restored both of them to the same OS version and tested them side by side. I saw that they completed tasks and launched apps at the same exact time. I don't know where you're getting that the iPhone 3G is faster.
If I were Steve Jobs, I wouldn't have ended support for the iPhone "2G" as long as the same software could run reasonably well on the identical iPhone 3G.
I dare anyone to show me a freshly restored iPhone "2G" and an iPhone 3G running side by side with the same OS (without restoring to a backup) and prove to me that the iPhone 3G is faster.
You didn't answer the question. You went around it.
If you were Steve Jobs, when would you end support for a 3 year old device? How long would you support that device?![]()
I would support the device until I ended support for the iPhone 3G (since they're the same hardware specs). So if the iPhone 3G can have 4.0, there's no reason the original can't have 4.0.
I would support the device until I ended support for the iPhone 3G (since they're the same hardware specs). So if the iPhone 3G can have 4.0, there's no reason the original can't have 4.0.
I would support the device until I ended support for the iPhone 3G (since they're the same hardware specs). So if the iPhone 3G can have 4.0, there's no reason the original can't have 4.0.
So, you would support the 2G longer than the 3G? Why? So instead of having 2G owners being upset, you will have 3G owners now upset because they will be complaining you supported the 2G longer than the 3G.
Would you still support the 2G even if the user experience is not the best and results in unhappy customers? I don't think people fully understand the "big picture". Sure Apple wants you to upgrade. I am sure it's for good reason too besides making them more money.
This is all forgetting the fact that this is a mobile phone and that market comes out with new phones every 6-12 months and the average support time for said phone is about 1-2 years. If that. Beyond that support is no longer available. What makes the iPhone any different?
I didn't say "longer than". I'd support it UP UNTIL I ended support for the iPhone 3G since it's the SAME. That's all.
I would support the device until I ended support for the iPhone 3G (since they're the same hardware specs). So if the iPhone 3G can have 4.0, there's no reason the original can't have 4.0.
What ever we do or complain, nothing can change. Just upgrade.![]()
I didn't say "longer than". I'd support it UP UNTIL I ended support for the iPhone 3G since it's the SAME. That's all.