Tech Specs: Full 1080p HD, LCD Display, 1GB RAM, no HDR, no 120Hz
This is the best TV ever…… for those who want tomorrow’s technology today…….
Price: £10,000

Tech Specs: Full 1080p HD, LCD Display, 1GB RAM, no HDR, no 120Hz
This is the best TV ever…… for those who want tomorrow’s technology today…….
Price: £10,000
A terabyte of storage would be nice. Then one wouldn't have to keep a server running in the background to play the movie.To do what more than the current one?
You are correct that you can use the display of a smart TV but you can never directly connect to that panel like you can on a dumb TV. Sure you can stop the thing from spying on you by disconnecting the WiFi, but you still have to deal with the interface that’s terrible. I guess this is the future because even Apple’s monitors have some type of smart capability. They’re not dumb display panels you connect to.Well, you CAN buy a smart TV with a panel you like and leave the “smart” section disconnected from the internet while using an Apple TV box. That’s what I do. I guarantee you economies of scale ensure a true “dumb” TV would cost no less.
If they could’ve somehow taken out what would’ve been their main competitor in the EV market they had a chance. With that company still in business I don’t see Apple being successful in the EV market. Even established legacy auto makers aren’t doing so well in the EV market.This will end the same way the car did.
Yeah it probably is just a rumor at this point.Not happening. TVs have too high of a return and damage rate and super low margins. There’s no serious business case for this, so this is just another filler rumor.
Well I would hope that wouldn’t be the direction they go. I feel like tvOS is already pretty limited.Assuming they don't make one with no inputs and have the built in tvOS be more restrictive
I could see them creating the captive audience and then trying to get a cut of revenue from those who want the "privilege" of being able to have their Apps on here
I put nothing past Tim's Apple
Hm, interesting, I can't think of a single time when it disconnected. Yes, the scrolling is meh, but tbh it scrolls a lot better than my tv, which just starts to lag. Mind you, my tv is only a couple of years old.My Apple TV remote is by far the worst remote among all of my streamer remotes (which include Roku and Nvidia Shield). It has the worst size and shape ergonomically, the weakest connection (resulting in frequent disconnects) and no dedicated Fast Forward and Rewind buttons.
The cost is a good point. I guess with wishful thinking I would hope they would charge it at a normal price lol. But knowing Apple, it would likely be priced too high.I would challenge that assumption because it would be a $25-2700 TV. They can’t keep their monitors on a competitive footing they surely don’t have the drive to keep up with the yearly churn of the TV market. The delta for people who would buy that is likely way below the threshold of what would be required for them to spin up production and market such a thing. Some people will buy anything Apple makes, sure. But the slow chill of the once thriving market they once enjoyed means they have to be real careful. A causal toe-dip into TVs will do more reputational harm than leaving it alone. Their window to do TVs closed a long time ago
I wonder when Apple is going to cut ties with LG and Samsung and manufacture their own panels.Yes please. Should be quite easy, too. The only OLED panel suppliers right now are LG and Samsung, both of which Apple already does extensive business with for iPhone and iPad panels. Just put Apple Silicon power inside plus the Apple TV UI (and maybe nicer integrated audio) and you‘re good to go.
I agree. I've been using a wall-mounted 75 inch LG for the last few years and it's awesome. But I suspect that any Apple TV set would be much smaller than this due to cost reasons. And if they did make a 75 or 80 inch TV, it would probably be extortionately priced. Personally, I don't think Apple would go after this market - profits are too razor thin, and Apple have seen how price-sensitive customers are with Vision Pro.Nah, it would be overpriced, too small, underperforming and probably without decent input options.
Sadly, no I don't. In the meantime I've gotta sit around a wait for my TV to boot.![]()
It’ll never happen. The profit margins on TV’s ain’t great and Apple doesn’t play small margins.
I remember when researching potential tv sets didn’t include a mandatory reddit thread dive on how to stop it from spying on you and selling your data.Wake me when someone decides to make a 'dumb' TV again. Something with a gorgeous display that does absolutely nothing except display whatever content I feed into it via a variety of ports.
Is that too much to ask???
Enough reason to ask for it, because Tim Cook will wait and wait and wait and wait until he gets sent off or retires, then to find a successor that hopefully implements itWake me when someone decides to make a 'dumb' TV again. Something with a gorgeous display that does absolutely nothing except display whatever content I feed into it via a variety of ports.
Is that too much to ask???
Yes, and they’re slow, full of ads, and track everything you do. This alone is worth the extra money for an Apple TV set imoWhy? Because the UI on current TVs are so horrible?