I wonder where bittorrent falls in there![]()
Interesting here are the different sets of motives that Apple and everyone else bring to selling music. Apple doesn't do it to make money on the sale so much as they do it to make the iPod experience better -- and thus to sell more iPods. So you wonder how that effects the competition between Apple and the other guys.
that's what apple want you and the record companies to believe. when apple was selling 100 million tracks a year they were breaking even or turning a slight profit, but now that they're selling tracks by the billion... they're probably turning 300-400 million dollars in revenue from songs alone.
sure they have to pay for advertising, and there's a music store staff that pick albums to highlight, and they've got server and bandwidth costs to account for, but make no mistake they're making a ton of money from itunes sales.
this has been apple's trojan horse all along. the ipod is fantastic, but it's the music store that's going to provide massive amounts of profitability in the future. it's why yahoo, napster, microsoft, walmart, mtv, best buy, et. al. got in the game without a DAP of their own; they all know that entertainment is going to be purchased online and it's going to be huge! just to give you an idea blockbuster alone has revenues of $5.35 billion dollars. dvd sales are in the tens of billions of dollars. apple is aiming squarely for those markets and i'd be willing to bet that a few years down the road, apple will clear $10 billion a year in iTS sales (all inclusive, music, games, movies (rental/purchase), television, ring tones, etc...)
I don't know. As recently as this New York Magazine story -- http://nymag.com/news/features/33524/ -- you see sentences like "The iTunes store has now sold over 2.5 billion songsand directly contributed next to nothing to Apples bottom line."
And Apple has never tried to hide that they're making money on anything. A profit-making company = a good investment in the stock market = happiness in Cupertino.
As an aside...it's interesting how fragmented the market is. I thought Walmart had a much higher percentage than that -- it's surprising that there's no really strong player anymore in music sales -- no one with a large marketshare.
Beware the monster we may be creating....
Good news, but now start pushing the CRTC so we can have TV shows and movies in Canada too. ;-)
With a lower-cost rental option for both, too. I don't want to rent music just like I don't want to buy most TV shows.
This won't directly affect the stock price, as Apple makes very little on music sales. 2/3rd of the money goes to the label. I think they just break even when you factor in the infrastructure/bandwidth costs associated with running the store. It's all about selling iPods. It will help to justify the current high stock price, though, as it bodes well for future iPod/iPhone sales...the more iTunes tracks out there, the less likely someone will be to move to a different player. No question, Apple is locking in lifelong customers.
Well, with the ol' mammoths Sam Goody, Musicland, Coconuts and other traditional corporate music stores all but completely gone, what's left? Walmart and Best Buy are still relatively the "new guys" in the music selling market and not even specialized in music. Amazon, Borders, CDnow and thousands of other online stores chip away at fractions of the music market share. Not to mention all the independent record stores that seem to be having a revival. What about the fact that pretty much everyone is selling CD's now? You'll find them sold at various grocery stores, Walgreens, health stores, gas stations, department stores, big box retailers, discount retailers, book stores, etc, etc.. Not to mention the e-music market that Apple is succeeding in as well as all the "lesser" others like Napster, etc.. Essentially, there are too many places and options available for one company to dominate in total market share as each business (no matter how small) still takes a fraction of market share away from the complete total. It all adds up when you consider the thousands of places you can buy CD's
Oh, and congrats, Apple!
Once iTunes totally lose the DRM, Apple can be en route to #1. I've certainly curbed my purchases because of this. Don't forget that itunes stocks a full back catalogue, while Walmart only sell the top selling hits.
I always have to chuckle when I hear the "I won't buy anything from iTunes until they support Ogg Vorbis, Lossless, 3 megabit encoding", you name the reason, crowd of whiners. iTMS sucks, the iPod sucks. These losers really put a smile on my face, god love 'em.![]()
I don't expect anything but to see Apple's music sales continue to climb until more competitive digital stores appear.
Selling CDs in retail stores is a antiquated selling method for todays media.
- What does a CD give you that downloads don't - CD sleeve, that's it
- Selection in stores is limited (often only new titles)
- They're expensive
I don't know. As recently as this New York Magazine story -- http://nymag.com/news/features/33524/ -- you see sentences like "The iTunes store has now sold over 2.5 billion songsand directly contributed next to nothing to Apples bottom line."