Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dre: 5 kids from 4 different mothers and this little incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dee_Barnes

Not exactly the type you want representing your company. But with Cook, profit is all that matters.

Didn't the beloved Steve Jobs initially abandon and not even claim his daughter? Yet we're here buying all of these products with his fingerprints on them.

Not saying that I think either he or Dre are role models for how to be a good father/husband, but it doesn't really have anything to do with what they are capable of professionally.
 
Why?

Your stock is as high as it's ever been... isn't that what really matters?

The shares have finally struggled back to the price they were more than two years ago. The market has been on a bull run all that time while Apple tried to recover. And the tiny dividend?

Money Market accounts can maintain with a small earnings and FDIC insurance.

Bid deal, Apple!
 
Beats for brains? Teach how to turn a failing company like Mog into something Apple paid $3 billion for.
 
You must not have heard about this guy called Steve Jobs who denied his daughter's existence for ages and was known to be a complete ass hole for years.

You should split a person's personal life from their business endeavours. This isn't politics, it's business. Your personal life has very little bearing on how successful your business decisions are.

Thank you for reminding the self-righteous of that fact. If you had not, I would have.
 
Hmmmm... another person who is vehemently against Apple buying Beats.

Why exactly?

And isn't it harmful to carry around so much anger?


I'm filing the Apple/Beats deal under "It happened... It's done... Get over it..."
The first worst and best thing Apple did was fire Steve Jobs. The second was that round mouse (Sorry Steve).
Now to Beats. Beats as a brand is not based on technology - it’s based on celebrity. Their products represent pure consumerism and nothing more. I realize Apple has to continue to aqui-hire companies that are like minded - but Beats? Why not just grab their dev team (if that’s what they are really after) and move on.

Perhaps Apple believed it needed a more youth centric brand to be hip.
 
as a significant shareholder in apple i really wish they hadn't bought beats.

PantsOnFire.jpg
 
The first worst and best thing Apple did was fire Steve Jobs. The second was that round mouse (Sorry Steve).
Now to Beats. Beats as a brand is not based on technology - it’s based on celebrity. Their products represent pure consumerism and nothing more. I realize Apple has to continue to aqui-hire companies that are like minded - but Beats? Why not just grab their dev team (if that’s what they are really after) and move on.

Perhaps Apple believed it needed a more youth centric brand to be hip.

I thought their revenue numbers were pretty darn good on their own, esp. given the purchase price.

I don't know what other reasons Cook had, I suspect it will take a while to see what else they had in mind.
 
This isn't quite what Steve Jobs had in mind. Steve Jobs thought the "intersection of liberal arts and technology" was what made technology better.

From that viewpoint, this school should have been set up at Stanford, near where all the technology companies are.

This is being done for the benefit of the entertainment industry. Iovine even said it: "The kid who's going to have an advantage in the entertainment industry...." It's also being set up at USC, which is also home of the very Hollywood Industry focused USC School of Cinematic Arts (formerly the USC School of Cinema Television), in Los Angeles. This is just the opposite of what Steve Jobs was talking about.

I'm cynical about this, and this is coming from a USC alumni who was in the USC film school as an undergraduate (I studied Film History, Theory and Criticism, not Production).
 
A significant share holder like you should have phoned Tim

Well, it's significant to groovyd... not necessarily to Tim.

----------

I don't think Beats properly represents the image of Apple in terms of quality, elegant and thoughtful design, and bespoke minimalism.

----------



'significant' to me in the sense of tens of millions not billions.

For someone worth tens of millions of dollars, you sure do get oddly defensive about random people challenging your bona fides in an internet forum. Multi-millionaires typically don't care enough to respond to people challenging their wealth.
 
This isn't quite what Steve Jobs had in mind. Steve Jobs thought the "intersection of liberal arts and technology" was what made technology better.

From that viewpoint, this school should have been set up at Stanford, near where all the technology companies are.

There are lots of technology companies in Los Angeles though and Orange County (yeah not a pleasant drive but still not far). I know plenty of people working for high tech companies in LA. Also, USC has some other stuff going for in terms of technology. As a UC graduate, USC isn't my cup of tea... no really, I think USC has had a lot of interesting programs and I used to attend one apart from my degree program. Silicon valley isn't the only place and this is a good thing for the various students in southern california.
 
Can't stand the fact that some good chunk of the money I paid for all the Apple equipment I own went to the pockets of these "crooks".
 
Jealousy? You wish. Why would I be jealous of someone who needs to lie on a board

People with real financial stake in Apple aren't on macrumors.com hahaha, you make this too easy


Lay off the guy, "significant" is a relative term. He didn't say he owned 5% of Apple... sheesh.
 
So....I guess Detox is never coming out.

I'm a little surprised Apple didn't implement Beats audio in the iPhone 6. Not that the iPhone 6 doesn't have good audio but the built in speakers could certainly be better.
 
I don't know much if anything about this Iovine fellow, but no way do I think Dr.Dre signed up for a bachelors. They threw money at USC with an agenda for [the school] to create a lesson plan that will undoubtedly earn both parties a hefty paycheck. It's sad to see so many schools capitalizing off poor college students eating ramen noodles. Yes, it is preferred that you earn a college degree, and once you obtain that you have greater chances for success, but with so many programs already out there you have to begin to wonder when duplication and the ease of accessibility is putting the credibility at stake. Case in point is all the under employed, hardworking folks who can't even wipe with their certificates.
 
Who cares...?

These are the two clowns who bought MOG and ruined it.

Of course, they bought MOG for 15 million and sold it to Apple together with a marginal accessories business for 3 billion, so the clowns are laughing all the way to the bank.

But I still don't care much to hear about them every time they pose for a picture.
 
Dre: 5 kids from 4 different mothers and this little incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dee_Barnes

Not exactly the type you want representing your company.

Steve Jobs had some issues regarding children too.

But with Cook, profit is all that matters.

Yes... profit is good!

And Beats is profitable. People buy their stuff. Apple already sold their stuff in their stores.

It's not like they bought some struggling startup...
 
Mental images of those movies where kids create their own university since they can't get into a regular one.

I just graduated from Cal Poly, SLO (where Oppenheimer went) with a degree in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies. Basically the same thing as what USC is now doing. And also similar to those movies where you make up your own degree... But actually I learned a lot and enjoyed it more than the previous 2 majors I had and got to concentrate in an area no other program offered. Overall I'd say this type of degree is well worth it.

Apple-Tech-LiberalArts.SteveJobs.jpg
 
The main thing I like about this program(At least from what I read) is that it's very hands on and applied.

The thing with hands on and applied is that it's called obsolete ten years later...
From what I learned at university, all the hands on and applied is pretty useless now : Pascal and Delphi are dead, C++ is a niche, Visual Basic is dead... On the other hand, all the theoretical stuff I learnt that was mostly research back then has become extremely trendy and fashionable now: functional programming, non-SQL databases, concurrent programming...

You're not doing an education for next year, you're doing it for the next 40 years... That's why you can't have only applied stuff, you also have to have enough concepts and theory to keep learn for decades...
 
I didn't say Beats itself has earned enough money to cover the purchase price. (although Beats has a lot of income)

I just said Apple had enough money to buy Beats. (and plenty more)

Look... people are acting like Apple spent their LAST $3 billion on Beats and they are now in financial ruins.

They aren't.

(hint... it's already paid off... - I guess it is how one interprets your statement. I've not read anything that suggests that the purchase has put them in financial ruins as you apparently have. $3 billion is a lot of money - there needs to be a solid return on that or some other concrete benefit for that purchase. One risk of having the cash they have is it can make one careless about expenditures - "whats $3billion given our reserves" mentality. I still don't understand the reason for the acquisition but perhaps that will became evident in the near future.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.