Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t think he’s the right choice for CEO. He lacks the executive presence and experience the role demands. As the article noted, while he’s well-liked and clearly talented in his domain, popularity doesn’t automatically translate to effective leadership at that level.

Craig Federighi would be a stronger candidate, though I suspect he may be approaching retirement. Frankly, I’m concerned about Apple’s trajectory overall.

Okay.. now let’s have those downvotes from the haters. LOL.

Cook has the presence and charisma of wet Charmin toilet paper.
 
I have zero problems with Siri. Works every time whether I'm at home using HomePods, using my iPhone, or in my car using CarPlay.

One can never fully dispute someone claiming what is their own experience, but I have to say it strains credulity to say Siri "works every time" and you have "zero problems" with it.

Never? Ever?
Of any kind?

That just isn't true of anything in the tech space and certainly not Siri.

Perhaps you'd care to add a few qualifiers?
 
One can never fully dispute someone claiming what is their own experience, but I have to say it strains credulity to say Siri "works every time" and you have "zero problems" with it.

Never? Ever?
Of any kind?

That just isn't true of anything in the tech space and certainly not Siri.

Perhaps you'd care to add a few qualifiers?

*If* it has in the years past, it would certainly be much less than 1% of the time.
 
... Ternus has been involved with a number of innovative products over the years, including spearheading the effort to develop the iPhone Air and working on the upcoming foldable iPhone. ...
Given that, it seems plausible that he will be the one introducing the iPhone Fold during their (now traditional) pre-recorded ridiculously Hollywooded keynote speech... and such an introduction would seem like a natural moment to do a public hand-off, officially giving Ternus the reins and an opportunity to reveal his vision for the future of Apple.

I'm sensing... bar charts...
 
Debates over who is the better or more logical choice are interesting, but there can be only one choice. To be CEO, you have to want to be a CEO. What's more interesting to me is speculation about what the others will do when not selected to be CEO. If there has been a leadership exodus up to this point, just wait and watch.
 
I don’t think he’s the right choice for CEO. He lacks the executive presence and experience the role demands. As the article noted, while he’s well-liked and clearly talented in his domain, popularity doesn’t automatically translate to effective leadership at that level.

Craig Federighi would be a stronger candidate, though I suspect he may be approaching retirement. Frankly, I’m concerned about Apple’s trajectory overall.

Okay.. now let’s have those downvotes from the haters. LOL.
I’m not hating at all, I’m honestly curious here…
What exactly makes Craig more qualified?
The man doesn’t seem interested in much outside of Apple‘s software development, he has worked at Apple a significantly shorter amount of time than John Ternus, he was absent for the majority of the development of both the iPod, iPhone and iPad, and he’s six years older.
The two things Craig really has going for him is his absolute dedication to privacy (sometimes literally going against Apple’s own like Phil and Eddie on privacy related matters) and his great stage presence.
Other than that, he seems like he’s right where he wants to be.
Obviously, we will always be on the outside looking in, but even from that, you could always tell that someone like Scott Forstall or Johnny Ive or many others wanted more power within the company, Craig, from what we know, never has.
 
I don't disagree honestly. I didn't love Forstall's obsession with skeuomorphism but the software did seem more exciting and unique at that time.
The software was more basic back then. Implementing the low hanging fruit is always more exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Debates over who is the better or more logical choice are interesting, but there can be only one choice. To be CEO, you have to want to be a CEO. What's more interesting to me is speculation about what the others will do when not selected to be CEO. If there has been a leadership exodus up to this point, just wait and watch.
Only one, indeed... but I suspect that the contenders who were the most annoyed at not being selected are likely represented by the exoduses that we've been reading about recently. Plans of this type don't happen overnight, and you can pretty much bet that anyone who might conceivably have been in the running at some point already knows who has been chosen.
 
Debates over who is the better or more logical choice are interesting, but there can be only one choice. To be CEO, you have to want to be a CEO. What's more interesting to me is speculation about what the others will do when not selected to be CEO. If there has been a leadership exodus up to this point, just wait and watch.
Snazzy labs actually made a video exactly about this, and how Tim and company have been clearing the deck before the next CEO steps in to avoid something like this.
 
I’m not hating at all, I’m honestly curious here…
What exactly makes Craig more qualified?

The man doesn’t seem interested in much outside of Apple‘s software development, he has worked at Apple a significantly shorter amount of time than John Ternus, he was absent for the majority of the development of both the iPod, iPhone and iPad, and he’s six years older.
The two things Craig really has going for him is his absolute dedication to privacy (sometimes literally going against Apple’s own like Phil and Eddie on privacy related matters) and his great stage presence.
Other than that, he seems like he’s right where he wants to be.
Obviously, we will always be on the outside looking in, but even from that, you could always tell that someone like Scott Forstall or Johnny Ive or many others wanted more power within the company, Craig, from what we know, never has.

That's an excellent question. I think many people reflexively like Craig F due to him having good optics and being a nice guy with a relatable personality who presents well.

I don't think that necessarily qualifies someone (not referring to Craig) with those attributes being a CEO of one of the world's most successful consumer tech companies in the world with responsibilities for its 160,000+ employees.

Cook has done an outstanding job propelling Apple to where it is today.
 
Only one, indeed... but I suspect that the contenders who were the most annoyed at not being selected are likely represented by the exoduses that we've been reading about recently. Plans of this type don't happen overnight, and you can pretty much bet that anyone who might conceivably have been in the running at some point already knows who has been chosen.
Perhaps, but the only name among the recent exodus who had any chance of being CEO was Williams, and he be retiring. Real contenders are all still in the mix. I have to disagree w/ the assertion contenders would already know, especially if the Board is aware they want to be a CEO.
 
That's an excellent question. I think many people reflexively like Craig F due to him having good optics and being a nice guy with a relatable personality.
You are very likely correct.
Much like how people reflexively think Scott Forstall would’ve been a good CEO because of his similar traits to Jobs, despite us knowing actually very little about him other than his presentations, and the fact that neither Steve himself, nor Tim, or Johnny, or anyone else in the company really thought he should have been the CEO.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.