How old is Federighi?
Federighi has the personality and is a great presenter but software has been rough due to his horrible leadership.Ternus is great but this does give me pause. I'd also argue that the future of apple is in software and services. So I think Federighi is a better choice.
My point was that there was no substance to the quote. I would expect that the New York Times could find someone who actually had a strong opinion, one way or the other. Otherwise, I would expect that the journalistic standards would prevent them from including a quote.I suspect you’ve missed the point of the piece. The author gave us a few quotes that describe how insiders view Termus’s strong points- and weak points. In other words, a nice guy who knows a lot but really hasn’t been tested with the tough stuff.
Maybe not, but a strategy, other that "let's see what sticks when we throw it against the wall", is required for focus and fund the engineering and creative processes at Apple. They have been without focus since Jobs left.CEO is not an engineering job.
Everybody always moans about the Vision Pro, but having one I always wonder what the problem is. Yes, it's expensive, but it's also an amazing product. What exactly makes you hate on the Vision Pro?Did he have anything to do with the Vision Pro? If so, we don’t want him
found Tim's altI have zero problems with Siri. Works every time whether I'm at home using HomePods, using my iPhone, or in my car using CarPlay.
Maybe you ought to actually look into the data, because historical data shows that tech companies do way better when their CEO's are engineers than when they are MBA'sCEO is not an engineering job.
The cost makes it difficult for people actually evaluate it as a product. Its actually a great product with a lot of promise.Everybody always moans about the Vision Pro, but having one I always wonder what the problem is. Yes, it's expensive, but it's also an amazing product. What exactly makes you hate on the Vision Pro?
Craig’s team implemented Liquid Glass. One might argue that people have more of a problem with the bugginess of the implementation than the design itself.Not his fault as software was fragmented into three teams. Craig did software, Giannandrea AI (responsible for the whole Apple Intelligence disaster) and Dye UI (liquid glass disaster).
Power user!I have zero problems with Siri. Works every time whether I'm at home using HomePods, using my iPhone, or in my car using CarPlay.
What pedigree does he have with “political and policy issues”?Ternus is great but this does give me pause. I'd also argue that the future of apple is in software and services. So I think Federighi is a better choice.
Claiming that Tim Cook is a “throw it against the wall” guy is frankly ridiculous.Maybe not, but a strategy, other that "let's see what sticks when we throw it against the wall", is required for focus and fund the engineering and creative processes at Apple. They have been without focus since Jobs left.
Is Tim Cook an engineer? From a financial standpoint Apple has been doing pretty well with Cook as CEO. Not everything is perfect, but I prefer him over anyone I can think of, because anyone else will be worse in some way. It doesn’t make sense to measure him up against a dead guy. “Anyone else” is also not Steve Jobs.Maybe you ought to actually look into the data, because historical data shows that tech companies do way better when their CEO's are engineers than when they are MBA's
I mean... sure. It's been this way since Steve Jobs was in charge, and his unusually charismatic influence on people was even formally acknowledged and granted a name (RDF). But you say that like you think that followers of the Ways of Windows or adherents to the Acolytes of Android are any less cults...God, it sounds like a CULT.
Cook has a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Auburn and a M.B.A. from Duke. Which is what I would expect from someone who made his name mastering the supply chain.Is Tim Cook an engineer? From a financial standpoint Apple has been doing pretty well with Cook as CEO. Not everything is perfect, but I prefer him over anyone I can think of, because anyone else will be worse in some way. It doesn’t make sense to measure him up against a dead guy. “Anyone else” is also not Steve Jobs.
What pedigree does he have with “political and policy issues”?
I wouldn’t judge someone’s capability as CEO on neither what area he is in charge of now, nor how good he looks on camera.