It seems to me that he is taking some credit by himself.I'm glad to see the man get some credit.
Woyzeck post (#33) says it all
It seems to me that he is taking some credit by himself.I'm glad to see the man get some credit.
So the hardware engineers couldn't be working on Macs? And if the MBPs are just spec bumps what involvement would Ive have anyway?
What does Apple get out of all this time & energy from their employees?
Except your just contradicted yourself, so you fixed nothing. If Ive is right about skeuomorphism (and he's wrong), he wouldn't need a new OS because he just designed the least skeuomorphic OS the world has ever seen. So thanks for playing, please try again!
Are we talking about the same Steve Jobs that approved lickable Aqua GUI and translucent plastic Macs?
Or are we talking about the Steve Jobs who put the leather-stichting on iCal and the green felt on Game Center?.
I believe Ive has a unique style, something that manages to be industrial, minimalist, but soft and full of emotion at the same time. It's a perfect example of post modern design (some could say with influences from the neo-romantic movement).
agreed.. Leica have always made well designed and aesthetically pleasing cameras.. this just looks like it was borrowed design from the Mac pro.. so i find it a bit surprising how much man power and hours it took for Ive to come up with this.
Image
That is a lot of work for a one-of-a-kind camera!
Like many industrial designers, Ive is a big fan of Dieter Rams, a Functionalist. People have often noted how similar Apple products are to some of Rams' work.
View attachment 440141
This is also why it was easy to predict a plain, bright UI for iOS7, with basic geometric elements. The colors, however, are all Ive.
Wow!
Methinks that Ive is starting to believe the legend of Ive, which is never a good thing.
He is obviously a good designer, but really...?
But there are other kinds of designers, and being good at one doesn't make you good at another: Visual designers and Interaction Designers. Ives has shown he is NO interaction designer...
Except your just contradicted yourself, so you fixed nothing. If Ive is right about skeuomorphism (and he's wrong), he wouldn't need a new OS because he just designed the least skeuomorphic OS the world has ever seen. So thanks for playing, please try again!
Thank you for that. This case makes it obvious that he's prefering form over function.
Ive's M9 has removed the unique and tangible camera controls from the camara's top that are important for the photographer and replaced them with uniform buttons (all images (c) by Leica):
Image
Image
While you could easily find and control the original M9's shutter speed without looking at the camera Ive's improvement removed the haptic feedback with flat wheels.
Then he removed the flash hotshoe, presumably because it destroyed the slick looks. And heck, who needs an external flash when taking pictures (remember the DVD drive in the iMac) ?
The situation on the back is similiar:
Image
Image
Leica's design has a four-wheel control with elevated buttons that provide haptic feedback, while Ive's version has a less-usable flat wheel. Furthermore the more important menu button is well-placed on the top-right corner of the display. Ive hides this button somewhere within 5 other buttons (again, they're flat). So in order to open the menu you will have to look at the camera's back.
Furthermore he removed the ocular's hood that reduces sun reflexions. But ok, it's more flat now.
Then he removed the zoom wheel from the bottom right place (where you usually have your thumb when taking a picture because the trigger finger is - well at the trigger) and replaced them with two flat buttons (again, no haptic feedback). It's clear that controlling the zoom with a wheel is much better than by pressing two buttons (faster, more precise, easier to find, more convenient).
So what we have here is the iMac of photography. It's less usable but slick.
(I'd like to see if he changed the menus and the other UI components to plain text as well ;-))
Ives is a gifted INDUSTRIAL designer. He is great at designing boxes. He probably designed the round mouse too since that is what industrial designers do, though we can blame Jobs for that since it was on his watch and the dead can't do rebuttals.
But there are other kinds of designers, and being good at one doesn't make you good at another: Visual designers and Interaction Designers. Ives has shown he is NO interaction designer since iOS7 is less usable than iOS6 with the contrast and missing affordances. You can remove skeumorphism without removing affordances. And the ugly cartoony look of iOS7 shows he is also not a visual designer either. It is like he tossed a visual design textbook on Modern at the iPhone and totally missed the heart of the device.
No one had to be told the first iPhone, its icons and colors were beautiful. People are being TOLD that iOS7's Colecovision keyboard and buttonless buttons ARE better and if you don't agree, you are a retard. Selling products with arrogance is not sustainable unless there is substance behind it, and this Emperor's junk is waving in the wind.
If Ivy stopped now, he'd still be a legendary industrial designer. Actually, Jony, please---stop now. You are like Michael Jordan playing baseball. It's embarrassing.