Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We pretty much now know Ive's products were collaborations between him and Steve - the results of two brilliant minds working together.

The question is if Ive is now surrounded by yes men and sycophants - people afraid to challenge him and say "no" like Steve did.
 
Last edited:
So the hardware engineers couldn't be working on Macs? And if the MBPs are just spec bumps what involvement would Ive have anyway?

There are many things on the MBP that are not perfect. For example you can still feel the buttons. Obviously that's not flat enough.

Furthermore the user can still replace the external power plug. I suggest to make the cord non-removable. If the ac adapter breaks people should bring their MBPs to the next Apple Store and have this fixed there. And heck, who needs those outdated USB ports ? Get rid of them as well, so that the case gets a much slicker look. Instead of that people really need a third Thunderbolt port. As there are no devices available for that those ugly cables won't ruin the looks.

And did I already mention that it's not requested by most users that they can adapt the angle of the display ? We should remove that useless choice and have only two options: closed and open. That would be really minimalistic and perfect.
 
I have a Leica M9, and Leica lenses. Though this design looks good, it totally misses what Leica is trying to do with the manual photography experience. The shutter speed dial looks like it will be hard to get to. So is the aperture ring on the lens. No focusing tab, so you cannot focus with on finger on the focusing tab.... Sorry, but Leica M's are about getting back to basics of photography, not making the camera so "clean", that it makes it harder to take a picture... Love apple, and love Leica. But hate this Ive designed M.
 
What does Apple get out of all this time & energy from their employees?

Are you seriously asking what people get out of doing charity work?

  • A positive sense of well-being from helping society
  • Additional industrial design experience on a new device
  • Keeping Ive happy
  • Good PR
  • Tax writeoff?
  • New business ties with Leica
But mostly the point is the charity.
 
Except your just contradicted yourself, so you fixed nothing. If Ive is right about skeuomorphism (and he's wrong), he wouldn't need a new OS because he just designed the least skeuomorphic OS the world has ever seen. So thanks for playing, please try again!

I was agreeing with you that the skeuomorphc design sucks majorly. But iOS7 is definitely not an improvement. So no, I didnt contradict myself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Steve Jobs's empire wasn't built on the 'Modern' design fad

Are we talking about the same Steve Jobs that approved lickable Aqua GUI and translucent plastic Macs?

Or are we talking about the Steve Jobs who put the leather-stichting on iCal and the green felt on Game Center?.

That's right, the same Steve Jobs who took a dying company and made it into one of the most successful companies in history. He did it with colorful Macs, and bold designs and breakthrough products. Just because skeuomorphism as a fad has passed didn't make his decisions poor ones. They sold. That round hockey puck actually may have come from Jony Ive --- form over function, just like iOS 7.

Jobs didn't built Apple into the empire it is with bland unfinished designs that look like a Scooby Doo cartoon, with a design sensibility right out of the early 1970s. It's a new fad for those not old enough to remember it last time.

No one had to be TOLD they must like the products Jobs was selling. We are now being told we SHOULD like the look of these products or we are clueless, or dumb or old, or <insert ad hominem attack>. Good luck with that.
This is why Cook is no Steve Jobs, nor is Jony Ive. Jobs was a good showman but the products were really good too; you didn't have to have someone explain why you should like them---if you used them, you liked them.
 
I believe Ive has a unique style, something that manages to be industrial, minimalist, but soft and full of emotion at the same time. It's a perfect example of post modern design (some could say with influences from the neo-romantic movement).

Like many industrial designers, Ive is a big fan of Dieter Rams, a Functionalist. People have often noted how similar Apple products are to some of Rams' work.

dieter_ives2.png

This is also why it was easy to predict a plain, bright UI for iOS7, with basic geometric elements. The colors, however, are all Ive.
 
agreed.. Leica have always made well designed and aesthetically pleasing cameras.. this just looks like it was borrowed design from the Mac pro.. so i find it a bit surprising how much man power and hours it took for Ive to come up with this.

Image

Mac Pro is prettier, in my opinion.

----------

That is a lot of work for a one-of-a-kind camera!

If only he spent that much time working on the icons in iOS 7.
 
Michael Jordan playing baseball

Like many industrial designers, Ive is a big fan of Dieter Rams, a Functionalist. People have often noted how similar Apple products are to some of Rams' work.

View attachment 440141

This is also why it was easy to predict a plain, bright UI for iOS7, with basic geometric elements. The colors, however, are all Ive.

Ives is a gifted INDUSTRIAL designer. He is great at designing boxes. He probably designed the round mouse too since that is what industrial designers do, though we can blame Jobs for that since it was on his watch and the dead can't do rebuttals.

But there are other kinds of designers, and being good at one doesn't make you good at another: Visual designers and Interaction Designers. Ives has shown he is NO interaction designer since iOS7 is less usable than iOS6 with the contrast and missing affordances. You can remove skeumorphism without removing affordances. And the ugly cartoony look of iOS7 shows he is also not a visual designer either. It is like he tossed a visual design textbook on Modern at the iPhone and totally missed the heart of the device.

No one had to be told the first iPhone, its icons and colors were beautiful. People are being TOLD that iOS7's Colecovision keyboard and buttonless buttons ARE better and if you don't agree, you are a retard. Selling products with arrogance is not sustainable unless there is substance behind it, and this Emperor's junk is waving in the wind.

If Ivy stopped now, he'd still be a legendary industrial designer. Actually, Jony, please---stop now. You are like Michael Jordan playing baseball. It's embarrassing.
 
Wow!

Methinks that Ive is starting to believe the legend of Ive, which is never a good thing.

He is obviously a good designer, but really...?

You are correct. Ive has indeed left an indelible mark upon the history of product design. However, there is a indeterminate lifespan to all design themes and I sense an imminent & looming end for Apple's highly successful aluminum themes. It's time to move on.
 
But there are other kinds of designers, and being good at one doesn't make you good at another: Visual designers and Interaction Designers. Ives has shown he is NO interaction designer...

No argument from me.

It was incredibly clear from all from the newbie mistakes (inconsistent icons / text combinations, poor readability, poor affordances) that he had zero UI/UX design experience and apparently didn't take any advice at first from those who do.

Hopefully that will change over time. I think it will.
 
I'm from the UK and I have to admit, he embarrasses the hell out of me now.

It's like he had become a joke/parody of himself.
Esp the Apple Launch adverts, they are sooooo terrible the way he speaks and reads the scripts to camera.

The perfection thing is great, but he can miss the obvious.
Like obsessing so much on making it thin you make the actual product worse for it's primary function in the 1st place.
 
Apple / Ive deserve and get a lot of credit for the various hardware designs they have done over the years - they've released systems that look better on the inside than the outside - but in recent years they've lost some points with primarily anorexic / thin desktop designs designs, putting ports in the back ...

And what were they thinking when it comes to the UI makeover in iOS7?!
 
Did Ive really spend that much time and use that much man hours on this? It's nice enough but also looks like someone tried to copy a Mac Pro and make a camera. Only that person was the guy who designed the Mac Pro.
 
I prefer the Jony from the product introduction videos, or from the Apple.com Bio page.
 
Except your just contradicted yourself, so you fixed nothing. If Ive is right about skeuomorphism (and he's wrong), he wouldn't need a new OS because he just designed the least skeuomorphic OS the world has ever seen. So thanks for playing, please try again!

I've just checked your profile, as I've seen you from time to time.

You seen to post mostly negative comments about apple, and your first post I saw is a post talking about the effectiveness of samsung advertising.

I'm not accusing you of anything, but I wonder why you're joining an apple forum to post negativity.
 
You know this one off is build around the M240 not the M9. I agree that is form over function and it actually looks awful. The Leica M series hasnt changed design since the M2 and rightly so because the M3 was so well made and designed it nearly bankrupted Leica. Everytime they change something it got worse, I use the M3 with my M9P and people can't tell it apart.

Thank you for that. This case makes it obvious that he's prefering form over function.

Ive's M9 has removed the unique and tangible camera controls from the camara's top that are important for the photographer and replaced them with uniform buttons (all images (c) by Leica):
Image
Image

While you could easily find and control the original M9's shutter speed without looking at the camera Ive's improvement removed the haptic feedback with flat wheels.

Then he removed the flash hotshoe, presumably because it destroyed the slick looks. And heck, who needs an external flash when taking pictures (remember the DVD drive in the iMac) ?

The situation on the back is similiar:
Image
Image

Leica's design has a four-wheel control with elevated buttons that provide haptic feedback, while Ive's version has a less-usable flat wheel. Furthermore the more important menu button is well-placed on the top-right corner of the display. Ive hides this button somewhere within 5 other buttons (again, they're flat). So in order to open the menu you will have to look at the camera's back.
Furthermore he removed the ocular's hood that reduces sun reflexions. But ok, it's more flat now.

Then he removed the zoom wheel from the bottom right place (where you usually have your thumb when taking a picture because the trigger finger is - well at the trigger) and replaced them with two flat buttons (again, no haptic feedback). It's clear that controlling the zoom with a wheel is much better than by pressing two buttons (faster, more precise, easier to find, more convenient).

So what we have here is the iMac of photography. It's less usable but slick.
(I'd like to see if he changed the menus and the other UI components to plain text as well ;-))
 
While I love Jony's hardware designs and like iOS 7, he is starting to think a little too much of himself. Somewhat like Scott Forstall. :eek: I think he was able to focus more on the products when he was the man behind the curtain. Now he is acting like he IS Apple, which may be true, but it makes me think less of him.
 
This line "finishing the back of a drawer" reminds me of Steve's story about painting the back of a fence even though no one would see it. I wonder if he borrowed that.
 
Ives is a gifted INDUSTRIAL designer. He is great at designing boxes. He probably designed the round mouse too since that is what industrial designers do, though we can blame Jobs for that since it was on his watch and the dead can't do rebuttals.

But there are other kinds of designers, and being good at one doesn't make you good at another: Visual designers and Interaction Designers. Ives has shown he is NO interaction designer since iOS7 is less usable than iOS6 with the contrast and missing affordances. You can remove skeumorphism without removing affordances. And the ugly cartoony look of iOS7 shows he is also not a visual designer either. It is like he tossed a visual design textbook on Modern at the iPhone and totally missed the heart of the device.

No one had to be told the first iPhone, its icons and colors were beautiful. People are being TOLD that iOS7's Colecovision keyboard and buttonless buttons ARE better and if you don't agree, you are a retard. Selling products with arrogance is not sustainable unless there is substance behind it, and this Emperor's junk is waving in the wind.

If Ivy stopped now, he'd still be a legendary industrial designer. Actually, Jony, please---stop now. You are like Michael Jordan playing baseball. It's embarrassing.

His designs are still good. But because the visual style shifted, a small group of people don't accept the change. Similarly, a lot of people weren't impressed with the iPhone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.