This is the best response yet. I agree completely (not that anyone cares, I know). This fascination everyone has with changing things that are already great just baffles the f$%^ out of me. As I had posted earlier, and I'm going to repeat here, Android and Windows Phone are UGLY!! Not to say iOS7 (or 8) will be that ugly, but why change it just to change it? If there is something that doesn't work well that is a different matter but to change it because it is "old" or "not fresh" or whatever else the change whores always want is just moronic.
Just exactly WHERE did Ivy do a good job????
Mighty Mouse = Total Disaster Scroll Wheel
Magic Mouse = Diaster to work with
Retina Mac Book Pro = Cant use Bluetooth along with WIFI
iPhone = Antenna Problems
This guy is a disaster waiting to happen. And IS going to contribute to Apple's decline in quality... Most Pros are LEAVING Apple and OS X --
Ivy is obsessed with beauty in Hardware.... And his beauty in Hardware IMO is second, third, fourth to NONE..... But functionality HAS to be a part of the equation. Ivy's design is ONLY beautiful... Functionality is a catastrophe.
IVY should be designing Statues and Sculptures... NOT Computer Hardware..That needs to work..Would YOU fly a plane with CPU hardware designed by IVY.... NOT if you wanna LIVE
And he ought to be extremely ashamed of himself for THAT.
Johnny I. & Craig F. working together on OS X equals Bill G. and Paul A. trying to make windows as great as Mac OS X !!!!!
And merely thinking of this WallStreet idiot being paid by Apple to write great reviews on OS X which is going down the drain, makes me wanna call scarface and tell him that Mr. W. I just married his sister...;-)))))
Yeah, you're right, iMacs, iPods, iPhone, iP3G,4S, iPhone 5... Such disasters...
How about ipads, form ove function, right? Oh wait..
Macbook air.... Oh so big disaster, that every other company tries to copy.
I saw only 2 issues: mice and iphone 4 antennagate, but other then that is great.
And I will fix one more thing for you. General public doesnt give a ***** about Pros leaving Apple. Deal with it.
Meanwhile you can switch to WP8, where you experience things like random reboots or surfing over cellular data while connected on your Wifi.
General public dont really give a damm about apple mate, before you say something yeap a bigger world outside the states...
If you look closely at some of the products that Jony has apparently pulled off it's pretty much been downhill since the uni-body MacBook Pros in late 2008.
The once great looking mini is now a squat square without enough room for proper cooling, an optical drive or even a proper GPU. Yet it occupies more desk space than its predecessor! Instead of an exterior power supply that can be both more powerful and not transfer heat to the mini it's a little interior one. Instead of a front mounted SD card slot it's hidden on the back.
The new iMacs are a perfect example of form over function. The 21.5 has a stupid, little laptop hard drive, no replaceable RAM, no optical drive, no Firewire port and (again) the SD card slot hidden on the back. The 27in has similar problems, though less of them.
The disease of "thinness" has infected the retina MacBook Pros. An alleged "pro" machine without a dedicated Ethernet port? No Firewire? And of course no optical drive because Apple doesn't make money on optical media.
Really, the last few years have been the promotion of unnecessary thinness at the expense of computer function. It speaks of selling fashion accessories rather than computers. No wonder some pros are moaning about the lack of seriousness at Apple these days.
You make some valid points. I currently have an early-2011 MacBook Pro and I plan to hang on to it until it dies -- hopefully many years from now. I don't use the Ethernet port or the SuperDrive more than three or four times a year usually; but when I have used them, I was so glad they were on board and didn't require additional adapters for use. Also, I've heard mostly negative remarks about the Retina display MacBook Pros -- either display ghosting or the GPU struggling to drive all the pixels.
I'm not a fan of sacrificing features for thinness. I hope Apple takes the lead on directing the industry back to emphasizing function and still making the form beautiful. Beautiful does not always mean thin in my book.
The main reason I hate using google and microsoft is because of their design.
I think the general consensus of this forum is that no-one really understands how much Jony Ive has affected the design of everything at Apple. Apple didn't die when Jobs died, it will die when Ive dies.
That looks about right. Maybe Apple is finally going to stop copying Android.
Vectors have been around for so long, I find it strange why they were never introduced into today's OS's.
In my layman's terms the design is too cold and unemotional. Too techy, so to speak. Technologically many products are similar nowadays, so design and emotion become an ever-increasing factor in a purchase decision, especially for high-priced (read: premium) products.
Audi had similar problems in the past of focusing too much on technical aspects and have changed their marketing completely to being more emotional (think e.g. of the colour language and the "heartbeat" sample at the end of their TV ads) when they realized it.
Regarding Apple's products i could imagine giving the cold aluminum silver a slightly warmer tone, e.g. a slight hue (not more) of bronze, copper or champagne (think of something like the Pioneer VSX-908 champagne/gold, only a little bit more faded). Even a slight(!) blue hue would be better than pure silver. I also like unusual colors like e.g. Audi's "suzuka grey", which looks far better in real life than on photos. But i admit that such colors may not be mainstream and may also work better on cars than on comparably small objects. That's why it takes a design expert to test it out and decide.
Another point are the pretty sharp edges on current Apple notebooks, which could use a slightly stronger chamfer-bevel (wording?) giving a smoother curve especially at the hand-rest of the MB(P)'s.
This would show evolution without leaving the current design language.
Further long-term options could be a two-color design (perhaps with a slightly waved intersection) or glass parts, which could e.g. be smoked or lit (an evenly distributed glowing like the Apple logo on the back, perhaps with a variety of colors). Those options would require great skill and taste to NOT make it look tacky, but when done right i could imagine this quite well. Ive could be the man to do it right.
Beyond that i would like to see some intriguing new technical and design approach(es), such as the double-hinged flowerpot iMac had been back then. Current iMacs are the same rectangle sitting the same unergonomic foot for a felt eternity. What about a more ergonomic foot using an eccentric hinge for at least _some_ height adjustment?! Again - no big deviation from the current design language, yet a step forward.
Or what about the Apple logo doubling as e.g. sensor power button (Think Cube) when an Apple notebook is used in clamshell mode?
And the huge touchpad on today's Apple notebooks is predestined to double as optional second screen for status display, program control or similar. With suitable API all programs could make use of it. Again - needs to be done right to look good, but could be a really nice addition.
Enough for starters?! A trained design expert could probably easily think of half a dozen more ideas that would fit Apple's design language and premium claims.
Next you'll be expecting a eye-sensor on there, just like in the new Android phone, which is just gimmicky rubbish.
Whoa, looks much better than the current one! Beautiful, really!I too wish it would look something like that. Is it a design currently in use on any platform, or did you make it yourself?
It's a theme for Android(miui rom)![]()
It's a theme for Android(miui rom)![]()
I have great respect for Google's clean minimal design practices. It's one reason I utilize Googles services.
Most haters (why hate anything?) love to accuse Google of invasion of privacy. The fallacy of that erroneous claim is that insurance companies & big data collectors already have everyone's data.
They do a far more comprehensive job than Google, Microsoft, Apple & any other large scale tech corp. like Oracle. Thus whenever I see someone bashing Google as evil, I laugh at how naive they are.
As far as J. Ive, I wouldn't be so quick to underestimate MacRumors members. We know he's a world class designer. His signature style on Apple products is a well known fact.