You’re using your dishwasher for work from home? 🤔My dishwasher can't run macOS. Worthless!
You’re using your dishwasher for work from home? 🤔My dishwasher can't run macOS. Worthless!
You’re using your dishwasher for work from home? 🤔
I’d rather look at a photo than strap a giant expensive thing to my face.You’re missing the point of it. Some things you can’t actually do in person like reliving a memory of your child at a younger age. Same reason we look at photos.
Wearing those ridiculously expensive cyber goggles is not worth it over just watching some normal videos for free.Spoken by someone who can teleport to Mt. Everest at any time. Astonishing. 🙃
The original McIntosh couldn’t run most applications made for the Apple II.That can’t run macOS. lol
You could watch on a cheaper headset. But either way, sure that’s up to you. And 2D photos and videos will always have a place. But spatial videos will be there as an option in case you ever decide to step off that odd hill to die on.I’d rather look at a photo than strap a giant expensive thing to my face.
Considering that the majority of Americans don’t have $500 to spare in the event of an emergency, I’d say that scrounging together $4,000 isn’t really in the cards for most people over the course of 9 months. People have other expenses, and could also buy a lot of nice things for that price.I don’t consider myself to be rich by any means, and by AVP launch, I will have saved enough to buy a Vision Pro + an extra battery.
It’s called a savings account, and everyone will have had about 9 months to save.
Why are all products supposed to be priced for impulse purchasing, and not viewed as something you might have to save a few paychecks for?
Yeah, if only there was a way to do that without expensive and awkward VR hardware...it’s wild seeing your own pets in 3D in front of you
And for people who are really into porn. Just like the early versions of video recorders. Those two classes of individuals will drive demand that increases economies of scale, spawns competition from other products and eventually decreases price and increases quality. VTR's are your case study here.
The visual quality of those cheaper headsets makes viewing a free hi-res photo the better option anyway.You could watch on a cheaper headset. But either way, sure that’s up to you. And 2D photos and videos will always have a place. But spatial videos will be there as an option in case you ever decide to step off that odd hill to die on.
Make some spatial videos of your car first, then it’ll be almost as if it were there.
Because in 5yrs time when you buy the Vision Pro equivalent of the iPhone 4 that’s affordable and mass market you’ll have 5 years of spatial videos to be view of your family, friends, loved ones present and past.
This device is going to engage a lot of shrinks as people dealing with grief, get addicted to watching videos on this of relatives who have passed and screwing themselves up thoroughly in the process.
I just tried a couple of iPhone Spatial videos on my Quest 3. Honestly pretty surreal in a cool way. You’ve probably seen 3D images and movies before, but it’s wild seeing your own pets in 3D in front of you.
And I’m sure it’ll look much better on AVP.
Managing grief is complex for sure. But, I think just knowing those memories exist is probably more valuable even if you never watch them. It's there, on your terms, rather than forgotten.I know how you feel about it is most likely the norm amongst most people, but not for me.
My son passed 6 years ago. He was a stand-up comic, and I have videos up on YouTube, as well as family vids and photos on all my Apple gear. To this day, I’ve only been able to watch one of his stand-ups. It’s just way too hard to see and hear. I can’t even imagine seeing him in something like what they’re describing here. I’d be a wreck. But, again, I know I’m an outlier in this, and understand how wonderful this would be for others.
Tell me you’ve never worked in tech by telling me you never worked in techYou can convert videos and watch them on any VR headset. Probably possible to use Google Cardboard if you wanted.
This does remind me though that Steve was still alive and in charge of the iPhone 4. That and the 4S were the last ones he had direct complete control over. Let’s hope Tim can do the same. Steve’s motivation was always to bring powerful technology to the people at a reasonable price.
Way back in 1984, Steve's Mac with 128K RAM, a floppy disk for storage, and a 9" B&W screen at $2,495, would be the equivalent of $7,400 in today's dollars.
$2,500 was a LOT of money back then, far from reasonable for a lot of people.
Yes. But compared to what contemporary computers did for similar amounts of money, it was way better. Or what it would cost to do the same thing without a computer. Same as today. Not everyone can afford/wants to spend the money on a Mac. Of course the difference is less stark today.
I don't even want to know what the equivalent of $3500 in today's money will be 40 years from now. But they do still seem to have the goal of bringing cutting edge technology to people that is relatively inexpensive (providing for their huge margin of course.) The benefit has always been the experience.
You jest, but I was actually going to say that spatial videos might be great for working on cars.Make some spatial videos of your car first, then it’ll be almost as if it were there.