Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just got 2.3 GHz 15 rmbp Haswell
- Thread starter ppone
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Oh I'll be coming from a 2010 MBP with a 330M; it will be a bit of an upgrade
+1 Coming from a C2D with 9600M
Please do a test that involves the GPU!
+1 really curious about this
Gonna run Heaven and Valley Benchmarks for the GPU
----------
It is but whether you notice it or not depends on what your doing. If your importing/exporting tons of files you will notice it.
For me I am not doing that so I won't notice it as much. The current SSD makes normal task fast but making them faster, I won't notice it.
----------
It is but whether you notice it or not depends on what your doing. If your importing/exporting tons of files you will notice it.
For me I am not doing that so I won't notice it as much. The current SSD makes normal task fast but making them faster, I won't notice it.
Just wanted to say thank you for taking the time and effort to benchmark for the rest of us waiting, on the fence or just sitting in envy...
So Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0 which test OpenGL rendering.
2.3 Haswell => 306
2.3 Ivy Bridge => 287
So the 750m has a 6.2% performance advantage over the 650m. Not much!
I will do the other benchmark form Unigine as well and then do the cinemark.
2.3 Haswell => 306
2.3 Ivy Bridge => 287
So the 750m has a 6.2% performance advantage over the 650m. Not much!
I will do the other benchmark form Unigine as well and then do the cinemark.
Attachments
ppone thanks for doing these tests!
how do the temps look during these benches, and any battery life differences? also im assuming that both laptops are on mavericks?
how do the temps look during these benches, and any battery life differences? also im assuming that both laptops are on mavericks?
Using the same Heaven Benchmark and gfxCard to make sure only Iris Pro is used.
We get a pretty decent benchmark.
Haswell (Irs Pro only) = 268
so Iris Pro is only about 6% slower than 650M and 12% slower than 750M for this benchmark.
I can see why Apple made the low end without a discrete GPU.
Cinebench and other OpenCL benchmarks should shed some more light.
Just Iris Pro seems ok for gaming. It won't beat 650m in terms of gaming but it close to it.
We get a pretty decent benchmark.
Haswell (Irs Pro only) = 268
so Iris Pro is only about 6% slower than 650M and 12% slower than 750M for this benchmark.
I can see why Apple made the low end without a discrete GPU.
Cinebench and other OpenCL benchmarks should shed some more light.
Just Iris Pro seems ok for gaming. It won't beat 650m in terms of gaming but it close to it.
Attachments
iris pro does very well in synthetics, much closer to discrete gpus like 650/750m. but in games, especially if you turn up the graphics level and resolution, the gap widens. see anandtech's iris pro review for numbers: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/10
Cinebench Results
2.3 Haswell (750m) =>
OpenGL 52.82 fps
CPU 599 cb
2.3 Ivy Bridge (650 m)
OpenGL 45.47 fps
CPU 537 cb
Roughly 14% advantage in OpenGL and 10% in CPU.
However the 2.6 Ghz Ivy Bridge is on par with with the 2.3 Haswell (750m), according to cinebench, in terms of CPU and OpenGL
2.3 Haswell (750m) =>
OpenGL 52.82 fps
CPU 599 cb
2.3 Ivy Bridge (650 m)
OpenGL 45.47 fps
CPU 537 cb
Roughly 14% advantage in OpenGL and 10% in CPU.
However the 2.6 Ghz Ivy Bridge is on par with with the 2.3 Haswell (750m), according to cinebench, in terms of CPU and OpenGL
Attachments
thank you very much.
1) But is cinebench CPU only or is it GPU only?
2) do i understand correctly that OpenGL is based on GPU?
3) are the test result for rendering or are they for modelling/screen refresh?
Can you run this cinebench open GL test with iris pro???
This test will be my deciding factor!