Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How do we know the FBI isn't lying?

We don't know that, nor do we know how much information they got or what it even means to "access" the phone. They could've gotten absolute gibberish but still claimed - for publicity's sake - that they found something.

Others are totally right when they claim this is more than just a phone. The Feds didn't want to set bad legal precedent in the courts. That's what this is about. Not just one phone.
 
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Traitorous fascists. I look forward to the coming civil war.
 
I hope all they found were selfies and dick pics. Would make this all for nothing.

Not really. Apple's intransigence on this issue has caught the eye of Congress, and not in a good way for them. There is no way they are going to allow device manufacturers to make devices that are warrant-proof by the government. Other industries, notably the telephone and banking industries, must make their products and services in a way that allows access under lawful judicially approved search warrants. Why should Apple be special?

This is not over, believe me, and it's likely to get worse for Apple as time goes on. As I said from the beginning of this whole affair, whatever the outcome, Apple will not like it.
 
So let me get this straight: your view and Apple’s view is that, on the one hand, it has no obligation whatsoever to help the FBI break into its phones; that it is outrageous that the FBI might ask a federal court to force it do so; that it has a First Amendment right not to and thus that Congress can’t force it to either; and that the FBI is on its own--even when it has a warrant--free to hack devices but without help from the company, at least to the extent that help requires writing code or offending customers.

Not that it has no obligation, but that Congress passed CALEA to in fact PREVENT the FBI/government from doing exactly what the FBI has tried to do.

But, on the other hand, if the bureau happens to manage to succeed in hacking an iPhone--say, with the help of an Israeli company--then it should inform Apple of the nature of the vulnerability so that the company can better secure its devices from future law enforcement investigations. To put the matter simply, not only does Apple have no obligation to give engineering help to the FBI, the FBI has an obligation to give Apple engineering help so that even the company’s most criminal users can be maximally free from FBI surveillance.

I didn't say that they must or are compelled to inform Apple. I asked ARE they going to inform Apple. The FBI is under no obligation to inform Apple, as much as, by law, Apple has no obligation to help the FBI.

Pardon me, but if I were working at the FBI, this wouldn’t sound like a reasonable position to me. As you would say, It's Asinine!! :p

Your pardon is begged. But don't blame me for reading comprehension failure. That... is asinine.

BL.
 
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Traitorous fascists. I look forward to the coming civil war.

Uh, the original FBI search warrant and writ met these requirements. It complied with the 4th amendment fully.
 
You'd be surprised how little that happens. There are lots of tools that the forensic community has been using for years which have never made their way to the public. Good luck finding even the most common tools like FTK in it's current version anywhere online (short of dropping a couple thousand dollars to buy it retail).

The people who have access to these tools are good guys. They aren't the type that are going to share them around or throw them on BitTorrent. It simply doesn't happen. On top of that, they generally have sophisticated copy protection (usually involving keyed dongles) which prevent just anyone from using them.

I agree with you mostly. Still, human nature being what it is, unless they find a way to head it off there will be lots of others looking to leverage this. This was far too publicized to sneak away.
 
Kind of torn between "Yay thank GOD it's over" and worried about security vulnerabilities.



Really hope the FBI will inform Apple about how they managed to get into that iPhone. Because it may be good news that Apple doesn't have to worry about this case anymore, but it also means their security needs to be improved even further. Anyway, still good news though.

I wouldn't count on it after all the government wants phones less secure not more lol :rolleyes:
 
My prediction is that they didn't get in through software but that they used a micron laser to strip away the security enclave's cover and manually pulled the security data off bit by bit. AKA they manipulated the hardware.

Of course the FBI is never going to tell Apple.

If the device even had the 10 try option activated. :eek:
 
For $15k I can't imagine they used optical / mechanical means to find the UID.

I would imagine they used a mechanism to block writing to the NVRAM partition of the NAND so the bad guess counter would not increment. Just saying.
 
Yea. Good for Apple. Im happy they stood firm, but troubled that it got hacked. Nothing is safe out there. Were just lucky that there is so many of us with iPhones that the good hackers cant rob us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gymgenius
Grapevine says it was a hardware modification that has been know for a while to access flash memory. Thus, it does not compromise existing non-modified iPhones. Technically this is a win-win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SantaFeNM
So you're worried about losing your iPhone at Starbucks and someone paying an Isreali company to open it? Pretty crappy security alright.

Israeli company today, neighborhood hacker tomorrow.

Haven't you all been claiming "slippery slope" since the beginning of this story? No longer?
 
Israeli company today, neighborhood hacker tomorrow.

Haven't you all been claiming "slippery slope" since the beginning of this story? No longer?
Only if the neighborhood hacker has a BGA rework tool, bus analyzer and iOS binary native format covered tools. What was does is some very intense intrusion rework on the iPhone motherboard to get the data. We are talking about $10K in equipment to start to hit that.
 
I agree with you mostly. Still, human nature being what it is, unless they find a way to head it off there will be lots of others looking to leverage this. This was far too publicized to sneak away.

And yet these tools have existed for years. The company that helped the FBI in this case has been doing it for more than 10 years now. People aren't going to suddenly care. Wired did a pissy writeup about how our tool was "shady" because it allowed the government to rip out passwords, browsing history, text messages and more from a suspect computer (keep in mind that they have a judge signed court order to do so legally at the time). They were pissed we wouldn't give them a copy of the software as they aren't our target audience and publicity with some silly publication like Wired does nothing for a company pushing their product to government buyers.

People may be talking about this now but give it a couple weeks and all will be back to normal. The media will focus on the Kardashians again and MacRumors will turn your attention to some other silly topic like how Night Shift may increase sperm count.
 
If any evidence or leads they get off that device ever goes to a non-FISA or pubic court they are going to have to disclose how they did it otherwise all the lawyers have to do claim is the FBI simply fabricated any and all there evidence.

Correct. And the most likely outcome is that the *second* time this is used (with a living suspect) it will be a part of discovery and the world will know. My money is on replay attack which is already much more difficult in subsequent iPhone models and can be made nearly impossible with some modification to the hardware by Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.