Those are illegal in California.I'm surprised an engineer from the Apple silicon team doesn't have some sort of non-compete clause in their contract.?
Those are illegal in California.I'm surprised an engineer from the Apple silicon team doesn't have some sort of non-compete clause in their contract.?
Eh, he left Intel and went to Apple and, from what we know (because he hasn’t been in legal trouble) was able to work at Apple without divulging Intel’s secrets, I’d say the chance is pretty good that he’ll be able to work at Intel again without divulging Apple’s secretsSo the guy responsible for the awesomeness of Apple Silicon is going to Intel along with all his trade secrets. I bet Apple is pretty happy about that.
It is certainly Apple news, which this site reports.Good for him... but is this news? People leave jobs all the time and it sounds like our knowledge of this guy is limited to what's on his LinkedIn.
Or maybe he did divulge Intel's secrets, and now he will divulge Apple's secrets. Only that he did it in a way that no one can be held legally liable. In a way, he IS Intel's secrets, and he IS Apple's secrets. He just needs to be there.Eh, he left Intel and went to Apple and, from what we know (because he hasn’t been in legal trouble) was able to work at Apple without divulging Intel’s secrets, I’d say the chance is pretty good that he’ll be able to work at Intel again without divulging Apple’s secrets![]()
Does Intel make SoCs for any client segments?Wilcox says that he will be responsible for the architecture of all SoCs for all Intel client segments.
Why do you think he'll be focused on Arm/RISC-V? He may be, but given Meteor Lake (due next year) appears to be a tiled version of the M1 (with unified memory coming in a later generation?), I could see him being responsible for x86 SOCs (or both).So what portion of the PC business do you think the Arm/RISC-V SoCs he’s designing for Intel will get?
I’m guessing less than Apple’s share.
Intel's culture has started to change already, which is likely why he's going to Intel. A lot of the leadership over at Intel has changed, and I'd like to think they've been moving in a good direction since Pat took over.Folks who jump like this are not looking to cherish their legacy which is a major shift in industry , they are just looking at money and knowing Intel , this guy will find out that he cannot change intel’s work culture
Think they hired an Apple System Architect to handle orders for their foundry business? Man is he going to be unhappy when he realizes she should have asked more about the role they had in mind for him…Qualcomm, for one.
True, kind of, very different market than today though…Intel tried to replace x86 before and got soundly rebuked.
I think that he’ll be focussed on Arm because when Intel uses the phrase SoC internally they are referring to Arm, and they use the term to make a distinction with x86.Why do you think he'll be focused on Arm/RISC-V? He may be, but given Meteor Lake (due next year) appears to be a tiled version of the M1 (with unified memory coming in a later generation?), I could see him being responsible for x86 SOCs (or both).
Also, having a foundry business that does x86 + Xe + Arm + RISC-V here in the states (rather than bordering China) is a big advantage for Intel that nobody else can replicate.
A better question is how important he and all the other engineers he knows and may recruit for Intel are for Apple.The question is how “key” was this employee. Not as key as johny srouji
Hmm. Sounds old-fashioned. I hope it's just a terminology issue rather than their mindset.I think that he’ll be focussed on Arm because when Intel uses the phrase SoC internally they are referring to Arm, and they use the term to make a distinction with x86.
He knows where the future is.
X86 and Windows 11
Not the closed garden of Mac.
Making Intel chips more of a SOC, with 10nm and smaller dies and leaving x86, could help them out big time. This is his expertise.Won't happen.
Bolting bits of M1 onto x86 won't fix the core architectural problems.
Because an ARM design is the only way Intel will get to sell anything to Apple. In the unlikely event Intel comes out with a stupendous x86 Apple still won't use it, they're all-in with ARM.