I love translucent display pictures; they always look like they could double as the thumbnail for an introductory Photoshop tutorial.
![]()
Nice one I agree, my whole life is a lie, everything is photoshopped - even our personalities. I am not a robot.
I love translucent display pictures; they always look like they could double as the thumbnail for an introductory Photoshop tutorial.
![]()
How would I put a case on it, then? I ALWAYS use a case on my phone.A fingerprint scanner on the back is by far better then no fingerprint scanner at all.
Sure it does. Both companies were playing baseball (fingerprint readers).that doesn't make sense.
FaceID has made using your iPhone as your ticket on the London Underground borderline impossible on a crowded station at peak time.
How would I put a case on it, then? I ALWAYS use a case on my phone.
Is that a problem?To be fair you have to look at your phone.
When I had the Touch ID phones I never looked at the phone to ensure the correct payment method was selected or the check mark appeared.![]()
Stupid. Just another place for dirt to get in. And depending on the case thickness it would be tough to get ones finger in the hole well enough to read the print. Necessitating a precise finger movement every time would be the worst strategy. Just move on to FaceID already! Join the rest of us. The water is fine.Just another hole in the case next to the hole for the camera.
Stupid. Just another place for dirt to get in. And depending on the case thickness it would be tough to get ones finger in the hole well enough to read the print. Necessitating a precise finger movement every time would be the worst strategy. Just move on to FaceID already! Join the rest of us. The water is fine.
While I think FaceID is the future, I think you’re vastly overblowing the case “issue”. There have been scanners in the back of Android phones for years with that exact layout and it hasn’t been a problem....Stupid. Just another place for dirt to get in. And depending on the case thickness it would be tough to get ones finger in the hole well enough to read the print. Necessitating a precise finger movement every time would be the worst strategy. Just move on to FaceID already! Join the rest of us. The water is fine.
It’s funny you think anything like the iPhone existed prior to Apple completely knocking it out of the Park.You obviously are not old enough to remember the PPC, let alone have one.
It’s funny you think anything like the iPhone existed prior to Apple completely knocking it out of the Park.
Yeah it did. You have forgotten how long ago 2007 was for this tech. It was incredible.With it's initial lack of downloadable apps, 2g etc.....not quite knocked out of the park![]()
Sure it does. Both companies were playing baseball (fingerprint readers).
Samsung is working on their base running, while Apple has clearly decided to stop playing baseball and opt to play Basketball (facial recognition) instead.
I didn’t think it was that complicated.
Among people who have already used Face ID, or among the many who have yet to use it?
Here’s my beef with the steps you’ve provided. You’re assuming the terminal accepts Apple Pay. If it doesn’t, you just pissed off people behind you. Why does this matter? It matters a lot in getting people to adopt the payment method.
I prefer the terminal to wake my phone first and then I authenticate. I’ve found TouchID to be better for this because I can rest my thumb on the scanner and put my iPhone near the terminal. My iPhone will auto wake, Auto Unlock, and then authenticate.
FYI, I prefer Face ID for everything else, but I haven’t found Apple Pay being as seamless as Touch ID.
Ah, choice. Additional components, additional complexity, additional cost. Once committed to this double-feature, how does a company abandon choice without stirring a hornets nest of dissent? What criteria will Apple use to determine when "consumer choice" becomes "the consumer has spoken?" Like Abraham bargaining for the survival of Sodom and Gomorrah, would 30% usage be enough to continue offering a particular choice? 20%? 10%?
In this particular context, "choice" is just another way of saying, "I don't want to change. Change is OK for the other guy, but not me."
Yeah, Touch ID has been a very successful feature. It may seem counter-intuitive to abandon a successful feature for a new one, but that's generally the way things go.
I once owned a house that was built to support both gas lighting and electric. Effectively a matter of, "We don't know if this new-fangled electric stuff is going to work out." There was gas piping running under floorboards, above ceilings, and inside walls, all to support a "choice" that was never used. In the end, all it did was complicate renovations. Even more ironic, the house originally had a coal furnace/water heater, and coal kitchen stove. Those were replaced by gas. Alas, no wood-burning fireplace, and the oil industry never got a foothold.
I’m in Toronto. Virtually all terminals accept ApplePay. Tap payments are ubiquitous here. The odds of not accepting ApplePay are actually less than them not accepting debit or credit.
Any retailer who’s had their terminal updated in the last 2-3 years works with ApplePay. If they’re serviced by Moneris or Global Payments (the top merchant providers), they get regular hardware updates. Small retailers who typically rely on Square, PayPal or Payd also accept ApplePay.
In any other cases, it’s immediately obvious because a) the terminal looks ancient and/or b) the terminal says “insert card” rather than “insert or tap card”.
All that to say that I know with confidence that ApplePay will work even before I pull out my phone. Double click the side button, tap and off I go. Works every time.
Yeah it did. You have forgotten how long ago 2007 was for this tech. It was incredible.
Apple is indeed leading the way here, with a 2 years advantage over competitors.
Incredible how far-sighted they are. Steve Jobs’ legacy lives on.
The n95 was a cool phone but it still had plastic buttons. The iPhone was today’s phone in 2007. Amazing.I had the original iphone. The UI I agree was fantastic. Very smooth back then, seems far smoother than ios11 on my iPad now but maybe I have rose tinted glasses on.
Coming from a nokia n95 though I found it a bit restricting not being able to install apps and being only 2g (there was no app store on that first iPhone originally)...that nokia was a brilliant phone. The UK at that time was way ahead of the US in terms of 3g networks, video calling, sports video highlights etc.
Then Nokia dropped the ball completely by not putting a graphics accelerator chip in the n96 and skimping on ram and the rest is history.....
The iPhone was a sexy phone back then though I'll admit it![]()
While Face ID is impressive, I find the Apple Pay workflow awkward compared to Touch ID. It’s going to be even worse on a Plus sized device.
this was the one chance for Samsung to finally one-up iPhone on something. they blew it.