how poetic.Your eyes are your conduits for sight. What sort of conduit will those glasses be?
Is your smart phone a one way street?
When it goes two ways is it always with your explicit permission and understanding?
What do we lose when this toy becomes mainstream?
What if someone wants to opt out? Where do those people go in order to not end up as cached data?
Do they just give up? After all, we've been socially engineered into willingly handing over our data thus far.
Should we draw a line?
Progress isn't always progress.
And I agreed with you!Did you read my entire (not very long) post?...
There was a period over which this was popular, then it faded away. THAT is the point.
I will concede that if any big tech company can pull this off it’d probably be Apple. They marry form, fashion, and function best, and the watch is a triumph. But glasses are more intimate and personal than even a watch and there are some intrusiveness issues I can’t see getting past no matter how many times I roll it around. I’m prepared to be pleasantly surprised but I remain highly skeptical.How about we just wait and see before automatically assuming that it’ll be exactly like Google or any other company’s offering.
People don’t know what they want until it’s shown to them. I think after all this time it’s fair to say Apple knows what they’re doing...
I will concede that if any big tech company can pull this off it’d probably be Apple. They marry form, fashion, and function best, and the watch is a triumph. But glasses are more intimate and personal than even a watch and there are some intrusiveness issues I can’t see getting past no matter how many times I roll it around. I’m prepared to be pleasantly surprised but I remain highly skeptical.
I am not sure why Apple insists on putting front facing cameras, Face ID sensors array/Touch ID button, and rear Apple logo in landscape orientation.
Aside from games (designed in portrait orientation) and reading, everyone in my household almost always use iPad in landscape orientation.
Well, quradofecta if you count implanted microchips as wearable.Oh absolutely. I cannot for the life of me picture myself wearing glasses like I do my Apple Watch or AirPods, but I’m very excited because of who’s working on it.
This really would complete the trifecta of wearables. Earphones, wristwatch and now glasses.
Let's not forget Gold or Rose Gold for the ladies.I have a feeling they’ll be “space gray” or silver. I don’t think people would want bright white glasses on their face Lol.
Same way people look “silly” with AirPods (which are now cool) will be the same with the glasses I’m sure.
ANYONE SEEN THIS FUTURE AR VIDEO? ITS TOO REAL
They took the existing 10.5” chassis and put a lesser 10.2” display in it, no mods done to the 9.7” chassis, it was scrapped. Kept compatibility with all 10.5” accessories. No way they stretch that to a random 10.8” that requires all new keyboards and cases. Maybe they could trim the top and bottom bezels to keep overall case size the same, but I doubt it. I think they’d repurpose the 11” pro casing and put a lesser 10.8” display in it. iPad Air 4.I wouldn't be surprised if they took the 10.5" chassis and enlarged it to fit a 10.8" display with a Home button. Apple took a similar step with the 9.7/10.2" iPad.
11" iPad Air with in-display Touch ID and thin-bezels leaves plenty of room for a low-cost 10.8" iPad.
They took the existing 10.5” chassis and put a lesser 10.2” display in it, no mods done to the 9.7” chassis, it was scrapped. Kept compatibility with all 10.5” accessories. No way they stretch that to a random 10.8” that requires all new keyboards and cases. Maybe they could trim the top and bottom bezels to keep overall case size the same, but I doubt it. I think they’d repurpose the 11” pro casing and put a lesser 10.8” display in it. iPad Air 4.
Fair enough, but it was designed to mirror the 10.5” case externally for accessory compatibility. I just can’t see them stretching the external dimensions of the base iPad to a unique all-new size.No, I disagree.
If you look at teardowns, you'll notice the 10.2" iPad has a completely different internal layout compared to the 10.5" iPad Air/Pro. The 10.2" iPad clearly uses the same layout as the 9.7" iPad. Everything from the logic board to the battery is the same. In fact, the battery is exactly the same across the iPad 2017, 2018, and 2019.
The 10.2" iPad is based on an enlarged 9.7" chassis.
Whoops, didn't mean to say Pro.The 10.8” will not be a Pro. It will either be an Air or an entry level iPad.
I disagree. Some of those features (usb-c, landscape face id, LiDAR) made most sense on an iPad anyway and wouldn’t necessarily be features that would come to iPhones. In-screen touch ID makes most sense (practically and economically) to me on a smaller screened device.I would hope so.
iPads received ProMotion first, LiDAR first, USB-C first, landscape Face ID first etc.
I can see Apple implementing in-screen Touch ID since there’s a lot more room/space. A good product to introduce it on.