Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lightweight material, more comfortable for long time use, using their iPhones power to run this glasses? damn this piece will sell like hotcakes. Portable VR Porn will be the main use for this.
 
Your eyes are your conduits for sight. What sort of conduit will those glasses be?

Is your smart phone a one way street?
When it goes two ways is it always with your explicit permission and understanding?

What do we lose when this toy becomes mainstream?

What if someone wants to opt out? Where do those people go in order to not end up as cached data?
Do they just give up? After all, we've been socially engineered into willingly handing over our data thus far.

Should we draw a line?

Progress isn't always progress.
how poetic.
For your information, whatever device you’re using right now, it’s probably tracking you. Your phone is probably tracking you in someway. Your watch is probably dragging you in someway. Your AirPods are probably tracking you in someway. Your home. Your music library, no matter what it is. Something that you own is tracking you. So if you’re really worried about that, well here’s my solution. Go off the grid. Because glasses are not going to change that. They are probably going to track you. And if people don’t care about that, which most don’t, then they’re going to buy it if it’s cool. And if they’re that worried, then they won’t buy it. There’s your option. If you don’t want it, don’t buy it.
You asked if there was a way to opt out? There is, don’t give them your money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
Did you read my entire (not very long) post?...
There was a period over which this was popular, then it faded away. THAT is the point.
And I agreed with you! :) I used to see pre-loaded iPod Classics, but, the last museum audio tour I experienced was via my own iPhone. Not only does everyone have an internet enabled phone with them nowadays, it’s a LOT cheaper to build an internal website with images and audio than it is to buy/rent, deploy, maintain and clean devices meant to be used by anyone who wants an audio tour.
 
I suppose I should wait then? I've been eyeing the 10.2 model but I'm a but concerned about how its A10 chip will age over time.
 
How about we just wait and see before automatically assuming that it’ll be exactly like Google or any other company’s offering.

People don’t know what they want until it’s shown to them. I think after all this time it’s fair to say Apple knows what they’re doing...
I will concede that if any big tech company can pull this off it’d probably be Apple. They marry form, fashion, and function best, and the watch is a triumph. But glasses are more intimate and personal than even a watch and there are some intrusiveness issues I can’t see getting past no matter how many times I roll it around. I’m prepared to be pleasantly surprised but I remain highly skeptical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
I will concede that if any big tech company can pull this off it’d probably be Apple. They marry form, fashion, and function best, and the watch is a triumph. But glasses are more intimate and personal than even a watch and there are some intrusiveness issues I can’t see getting past no matter how many times I roll it around. I’m prepared to be pleasantly surprised but I remain highly skeptical.

Oh absolutely. I cannot for the life of me picture myself wearing glasses like I do my Apple Watch or AirPods, but I’m very excited because of who’s working on it.

This really would complete the trifecta of wearables. Earphones, wristwatch and now glasses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kabeyun
I am not sure why Apple insists on putting front facing cameras, Face ID sensors array/Touch ID button, and rear Apple logo in landscape orientation.

Aside from games (designed in portrait orientation) and reading, everyone in my household almost always use iPad in landscape orientation.

Same here!
 
I have a feeling they’ll be “space gray” or silver. I don’t think people would want bright white glasses on their face Lol.

Same way people look “silly” with AirPods (which are now cool) will be the same with the glasses I’m sure.
Let's not forget Gold or Rose Gold for the ladies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
ANYONE SEEN THIS FUTURE AR VIDEO? ITS TOO REAL


Like something out of Blade Runner. And I don ‘t mean that in a good way. As cool as this looks, it would give me a headache after 10 minutes of walking around. Who wants to be bombarded with that much visual stimulus? Teenagers might love this tho. Maybe thats who they are marketing it to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
I wouldn't be surprised if they took the 10.5" chassis and enlarged it to fit a 10.8" display with a Home button. Apple took a similar step with the 9.7/10.2" iPad.

11" iPad Air with in-display Touch ID and thin-bezels leaves plenty of room for a low-cost 10.8" iPad.
They took the existing 10.5” chassis and put a lesser 10.2” display in it, no mods done to the 9.7” chassis, it was scrapped. Kept compatibility with all 10.5” accessories. No way they stretch that to a random 10.8” that requires all new keyboards and cases. Maybe they could trim the top and bottom bezels to keep overall case size the same, but I doubt it. I think they’d repurpose the 11” pro casing and put a lesser 10.8” display in it. iPad Air 4.
 
They took the existing 10.5” chassis and put a lesser 10.2” display in it, no mods done to the 9.7” chassis, it was scrapped. Kept compatibility with all 10.5” accessories. No way they stretch that to a random 10.8” that requires all new keyboards and cases. Maybe they could trim the top and bottom bezels to keep overall case size the same, but I doubt it. I think they’d repurpose the 11” pro casing and put a lesser 10.8” display in it. iPad Air 4.

No, I disagree.

If you look at teardowns, you'll notice the 10.2" iPad has a completely different internal layout compared to the 10.5" iPad Air/Pro. The 10.2" iPad clearly uses the same layout as the 9.7" iPad. Everything from the logic board to the battery is the same. In fact, the battery is exactly the same across the iPad 2017, 2018, and 2019.

The 10.2" iPad is based on an enlarged 9.7" chassis.
 
I like these better:
4782567057_e7e6f9d63b_b.jpg
 
No, I disagree.

If you look at teardowns, you'll notice the 10.2" iPad has a completely different internal layout compared to the 10.5" iPad Air/Pro. The 10.2" iPad clearly uses the same layout as the 9.7" iPad. Everything from the logic board to the battery is the same. In fact, the battery is exactly the same across the iPad 2017, 2018, and 2019.

The 10.2" iPad is based on an enlarged 9.7" chassis.
Fair enough, but it was designed to mirror the 10.5” case externally for accessory compatibility. I just can’t see them stretching the external dimensions of the base iPad to a unique all-new size.
 
I would hope so.

iPads received ProMotion first, LiDAR first, USB-C first, landscape Face ID first etc.

I can see Apple implementing in-screen Touch ID since there’s a lot more room/space. A good product to introduce it on.
I disagree. Some of those features (usb-c, landscape face id, LiDAR) made most sense on an iPad anyway and wouldn’t necessarily be features that would come to iPhones. In-screen touch ID makes most sense (practically and economically) to me on a smaller screened device.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.