Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So...with Apple's high-res video cameras, Face ID tech, the ability to do Animojis, and the desktop-class powered iPhone the system will be able to recognize someone walking toward you, quickly search the Internets for naked pictures of that person then map them to their body in your glASSes all in real time. Timmy Apple was right:

"...instead of isolating humans."
 
People would fill their bodies with fruit logo radiation / battery devices any day :apple:
You do know that non-ionizing radiation just passes through you or bounces off of you, right?
[doublepost=1552055890][/doublepost]
I seem to remember Google went down this path a few years back -- creating the word "Glassholes". Weren't there a few beatings that came out of it, too?

Just what everyone wants, a camera staring them in the face while interacting with another.

We're in a very creepy place these days...

Something tells me that the cameras will be unable to save pictures or video, and will only be usable to detect the environment to find surfaces on which to anchor virtual objects.
 
That would be nice, but it could also obstruct or cause more accidents possibly in busier metropolitan areas

That's the AR part. The visuals wouldn't obstruct your road view. They would fit correctly and safely into the environment you're driving around in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
So? People have been wearing glasses for over hundred years, also.

Yes people who need glasses to _see_ have been wearing glasses for over a hundred years. People with perfect eyesight don't voluntarily wear spectacles.

But VR, AR and 3D glasses have not caught on. People don't want to voluntarily wear things on their face if they don't have to.
 
Let me see. Some bean counter read some analyst reports about wearables being the future. They were promoted and the company diverted its Mac and iPhone resources to help get this project off the ground.
 
Sceptical. How can the tech be there?

Look what MS released? hololense 2. not very impressive, and the price tag. jesus

And also Magic Leap, not very impressive at all.

Also, what happend to: Its not about being first, its about being best?
The tech is already here, and actually separating the computation unit from the glasses will help a lot. This is what you can get now:
 
When the Watch was announced, it seemed neat, but I didn’t know how it’d fit into my life at the time, so, I waited. Now, it’s pretty integrated.

These AR glasses, I just don’t see taking off (no pun intended). I could see how they’d be useful in specific contexts, but on the whole, not really. Never know, though.
 
Yes people who need glasses to _see_ have been wearing glasses for over a hundred years. People with perfect eyesight don't voluntarily wear spectacles.

But VR, AR and 3D glasses have not caught on. People don't want to voluntarily wear things on their face if they don't have to.
Yeah, I’ve never seen someone with 20/20 vision wearing sunglasses.

I’ve also never seen anyone wearing a watch in a room with a clock.

And I’ve never seen anyone wearing shoes in a room with shag carpeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
These would be neat, but I don’t see a market for smart glasses being very big. I know everyone wants that next big product we didn’t know we needed, but with smartphone tech where it is, watch tech where it is, tablets where they are, wireless ear pods, there’s not much to wow us other than additional ‘wearable’ electronics.

It’s like everyone oohing and ahhing over the new Samsung S10. It isn’t revolutionary in any way. It has slightly more display area than a X/XS/XR, but it doesn’t do anything else interesting. Foldables may take off, but not before the price drops significantly. People aren’t flying out to buy $1000+ smartphones or tablets, why in the world would $2000+ foldables sell well?

I think an interesting product would be foldable computers to replace laptops. Probably hella expensive at first but that would be revolutionary.
 
Just because you criticize Apple, doesn't mean you are a "hater". It means that we remember when Apple used to be a leader in the tech field, not follower. When it used to innovate and not follow what others have already done. Making a buck seems to be the thing for Apple right now, instead of being an innovator. Devices/OS's are not as polished when Steve was in charge. We want Apple to lead and not follow.
So let me see, we’ve got Apple can’t innovate anymore, Tim Cook is just a beancounter, Apple products are too expensive, Steve would never _____ and Apple has lost its way.

Check, check, check, check and check.

You forgot where’s my Mac Pro, courage, you’re holding it wrong, Ive is obsessed with making everything thinner, Siri sucks, and 40-50 other overused memes.

Sure, you and a couple other complainers just want Apple to do better; the other couple thousand prefer to hate on Apple for anything and everything.

btw, you do realize you’re complaining about Apple not innovating in the same thread where a leading analyst is telling you Apple has something very innovative coming out next year? I’m sure you see the irony.
 
You do know that non-ionizing radiation just passes through you or bounces off of you, right?

Lol @ "passes through you or bounces off" - must be completely harmless then, never mind.
 
I seem to remember Google went down this path a few years back -- creating the word "Glassholes". Weren't there a few beatings that came out of it, too?

That's the first thing I thought too, but hey, this is Apple. Think different! You know just how the spin will go, in the ads and around here. See, all the anger and negativity directed towards Google Glass was justified because, like, invasion of privacy, big brother, "you are the product," exploitation, NSA, etc. But the Apple version will be about accessibility, creativity, social justice, great coffee, whimsical enjoyment, and artisanal cafes. Or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjudson and nvmls
I dare to say that this is nonsense. The tech is not ready and is years away from anything for the masses.
Not even niche as the technology is simply in its infancy.
Even siri can't handle basic things and is behind, AR/VR - nope, not yet. 5 years maybe 10 years more likely
 
The AR glasses are going to be marketed to people demanding cheaper, more affordable iPhones: just buy the Apple Glasses and boom, instead of your old iPhone you see the current model!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
Sceptical. How can the tech be there?

Look what MS released? hololense 2. not very impressive, and the price tag. jesus

And also Magic Leap, not very impressive at all.

How can Apple possible create something that is ready for mainstream 2020? Also, carmack said AR is 3 - 5 years behind VR in regard of pure tech. VR is not ready for mainstream yet, and the displey tech etc etc with screen door is not very impressive. Not sure how apple can pull this off?

Also, what happend to: Its not about being first, its about being best?

I mentioned this in a previous post, but they'll probably release it with 2 or 3 basic features, then they will add a couple more every year. Same trickle down effect the iPhone has had the last 3-4 years but even more exacerbated. I'm already annoyed, and the product isn't even released yet.

One could say that it hasn't been released yet so we don't know, but like you said, it's not rocket science to figure out what is available right now, and the tech that is really cool is extremely expensive and unpolished. This product will be a good product 5-6 years from now, but it will likely not be worth the purchase for several upgrades.

“Can’t believe apple is seriously expecting people to wear watches again when people can use their phone to tell time. Just what in the hell are they thinking??” - people from 2015

Calling it now. Because nobody has any vision, everyone under the sun is going to already call it a stupid product before it’s even announced. Then it’ll debut and people will love it, while it’ll have its haters as well saying it’s stupid and pointless. “Who is seriously gonna wear glasses all the time?”

I also don't think mainstream adoption will be an issue. People underestimate how quickly tech is adopted regardless of social instances, when it adds convenience to someone's life. It's not even necessarily a great amount of "value" add, but rather convenience added. I suppose that would be a type of value, but I don't think of it quite that highly.
 
Last edited:
yuck, they can't even get wireless charging going. but what would be cool is if the glasses could be universally modified to fit a prescription, I don't really care of AR glasses or whatever, but something like that would be cool especially in the health field.
 
Yes people who need glasses to _see_ have been wearing glasses for over a hundred years. People with perfect eyesight don't voluntarily wear spectacles.

But VR, AR and 3D glasses have not caught on. People don't want to voluntarily wear things on their face if they don't have to.

And many people never thought they'd want to put "1,000 songs in your pocket."

I expect Apple's entry into AR will be panned here. Like the iPod, iPhone, iPad, Watch, AirPods, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
“Can’t believe apple is seriously expecting people to wear watches again when people can use their phone to tell time. Just what in the hell are they thinking??” - people from 2015

Calling it now. Because nobody has any vision, everyone under the sun is going to already call it a stupid product before it’s even announced. Then it’ll debut and people will love it, while it’ll have its haters as well saying it’s stupid and pointless. “Who is seriously gonna wear glasses all the time?”

Then it’ll get popular and really refined and everybody else’s will copy them and we will get to a point a few years from now where we can’t believe we never had ar.

Sci fi movies imagine this for years. Holographic displays and graphics and being able to manipulate objects. And we all think it’s the coolest thing ever. Think minority report. Think iron man. Think tron. Think about not even needing a tv in your house because you can put a giant display and pin it to your wall in your glasses. Think about how interactive the environment can be. Meeting people and seeing information floating over their heads about who they are and how you know them. Or shared experiences with multiple glasses.

This could be a game changer the world over if it’s played right. But all anyone can say is “who’s gonna wear glasses all the time?”

I think you’ve not understood my post. I’m saying it is a REALLY difficult design challenge to do right. If someone cracks it then, yes, it could be a huge new sector. But it is going to be really hard.

If anyone can do it, Apple can.
 
If a camera is mounted on the glasses perhaps it should have a shutter that's closed when it is not recording. People don't like being secretly recorded.

If only sound is being recorded there should be an obvious red record light blinking other people can see.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.