Do not like. How would this work for those of us with glasses? Would they be able to use your prescription? I doubt it.
I think you'll have to wait and see what Apple actually releases.
Do not like. How would this work for those of us with glasses? Would they be able to use your prescription? I doubt it.
You do know that non-ionizing radiation just passes through you or bounces off of you, right?People would fill their bodies with fruit logo radiation / battery devices any day![]()
I seem to remember Google went down this path a few years back -- creating the word "Glassholes". Weren't there a few beatings that came out of it, too?
Just what everyone wants, a camera staring them in the face while interacting with another.
We're in a very creepy place these days...
That would be nice, but it could also obstruct or cause more accidents possibly in busier metropolitan areas
So? People have been wearing glasses for over hundred years, also.
The tech is already here, and actually separating the computation unit from the glasses will help a lot. This is what you can get now:Sceptical. How can the tech be there?
Look what MS released? hololense 2. not very impressive, and the price tag. jesus
And also Magic Leap, not very impressive at all.
Also, what happend to: Its not about being first, its about being best?
Yeah, I’ve never seen someone with 20/20 vision wearing sunglasses.Yes people who need glasses to _see_ have been wearing glasses for over a hundred years. People with perfect eyesight don't voluntarily wear spectacles.
But VR, AR and 3D glasses have not caught on. People don't want to voluntarily wear things on their face if they don't have to.
If only that were true....How??? How, you ask?
That's the Apple for you, they seem clueless and absent, and then they pop out of nowhere and show the competition how it should be done.
And then... everyone returns to their drawing boards.
So let me see, we’ve got Apple can’t innovate anymore, Tim Cook is just a beancounter, Apple products are too expensive, Steve would never _____ and Apple has lost its way.Just because you criticize Apple, doesn't mean you are a "hater". It means that we remember when Apple used to be a leader in the tech field, not follower. When it used to innovate and not follow what others have already done. Making a buck seems to be the thing for Apple right now, instead of being an innovator. Devices/OS's are not as polished when Steve was in charge. We want Apple to lead and not follow.
You do know that non-ionizing radiation just passes through you or bounces off of you, right?
I seem to remember Google went down this path a few years back -- creating the word "Glassholes". Weren't there a few beatings that came out of it, too?
Sceptical. How can the tech be there?
Look what MS released? hololense 2. not very impressive, and the price tag. jesus
And also Magic Leap, not very impressive at all.
How can Apple possible create something that is ready for mainstream 2020? Also, carmack said AR is 3 - 5 years behind VR in regard of pure tech. VR is not ready for mainstream yet, and the displey tech etc etc with screen door is not very impressive. Not sure how apple can pull this off?
Also, what happend to: Its not about being first, its about being best?
“Can’t believe apple is seriously expecting people to wear watches again when people can use their phone to tell time. Just what in the hell are they thinking??” - people from 2015
Calling it now. Because nobody has any vision, everyone under the sun is going to already call it a stupid product before it’s even announced. Then it’ll debut and people will love it, while it’ll have its haters as well saying it’s stupid and pointless. “Who is seriously gonna wear glasses all the time?”
How??? How, you ask?
That's the Apple for you, they seem clueless and absent, and then they pop out of nowhere and show the competition how it should be done.
And then... everyone returns to their drawing boards.
Yes people who need glasses to _see_ have been wearing glasses for over a hundred years. People with perfect eyesight don't voluntarily wear spectacles.
But VR, AR and 3D glasses have not caught on. People don't want to voluntarily wear things on their face if they don't have to.
“Can’t believe apple is seriously expecting people to wear watches again when people can use their phone to tell time. Just what in the hell are they thinking??” - people from 2015
Calling it now. Because nobody has any vision, everyone under the sun is going to already call it a stupid product before it’s even announced. Then it’ll debut and people will love it, while it’ll have its haters as well saying it’s stupid and pointless. “Who is seriously gonna wear glasses all the time?”
Then it’ll get popular and really refined and everybody else’s will copy them and we will get to a point a few years from now where we can’t believe we never had ar.
Sci fi movies imagine this for years. Holographic displays and graphics and being able to manipulate objects. And we all think it’s the coolest thing ever. Think minority report. Think iron man. Think tron. Think about not even needing a tv in your house because you can put a giant display and pin it to your wall in your glasses. Think about how interactive the environment can be. Meeting people and seeing information floating over their heads about who they are and how you know them. Or shared experiences with multiple glasses.
This could be a game changer the world over if it’s played right. But all anyone can say is “who’s gonna wear glasses all the time?”