I would *happily* allow tv manufacturers to keep their ****** remotes. I have this going on because I never use the factory remotes, which all suck in different ways (the ****ing LG remote moves the cursor around just from you moving the remote in the air. What a ****ing pain in the ass).This is completely unacceptable!! Earpods I can understand (even though i'm not a fan of) but the charger? No Apple, what are you thinking? When I buy a TV, do I have to buy the remote seperately? DO NOT GO FORWARD WITH THIS IDIOCY!!!!
That's because it comes with everything needed to plug into a standard wall socket.
![]()
Mobile Connector | Tesla Support
Mobile Connector is useful when you’re away from home and on extended trips. View the charging speed based on your model and adapter.www.tesla.com
What. the actual. hell
Unacceptable. iPhone 12 needs USB-C, and it needs a charger in box. Nothing less.
Silly. Yes, I suppose we all have a bunch of chargers, but C'mon....
no wired earphones, fine.
but no brick charger? seriously, where do they think they want the iphones to be plugged? that's nonsense
Nonsense.
Ever try charging a Model S from a standard wall socket? It’s like pissing into a hurricane.
Most iphone buyers are repeat customers. Most iphone buyers who are not repeat customers already own a device that has a usb charger. So you are talking about ”first time buyers of a device that charges with a usb charger.” Small audience that is.But what if this is someone’s first phone/iPhone? It would suck to pay more for something that would be needed to make the device run.
I have an idea, Apple. Quit trying to take every consumer for all their worth.
Like charging an iPhone from the wall without a charger?
But: Yes. And guess what? It works!
Makes sense with the pricing that was rumored, which already sounded quite cheap (by Apple standards). Also the cost saving in just shipping with smaller packaging due to this is enormous (don't forget that Apple flies not boat their iPhones out of China). It probably will be a 50% smaller package which basically translates in slashing the shipping cost in half.
Who doesn’t have a charger? Seriously, how many people have nothing in their house with a USB port, and yet they are buying an iphone?
You'd be correct if the rumor suggested that Apple would include a Lightning to USB-A cable, but it's apparently going to be USB-C. I'm willing to bet that there are still many people out there with tons of USB-A ports between devices and chargers, but no USB-C ports.And the next iPhone will come with everything needed to plug into a standard USB socket, so what's your point?
I don’t *think* I missed the point, but maybe I did. What’s the point?My regard for you is high (as I hope you tell), so I will simply note that your understanding of how most people live appears to be limited.
And your question misses the point - but you knew that.
Is this even legal in places like the EU? I guess if it’s optional but free?
I thought devices always had to include a charger to charge it? I understand having the option to remove it though - to save waste.
Say thank you to the EU - they‘re forcing Apple to ship their mobile phones with universal chargers. As they‘re refusing, leaving away the charger altogether is a perfect way (for them) to prevent the EU from going after them
Could be Kuo just wanting attention but pretty negative reaction and Apple wouldn’t like if not in consideration.I trust this guy more than barclays but still think this is a load of rubbish.