On the big machines like 14 and 16 there is space for both. You can have a proper keyboard AND a touch bar.
Safe to assume it would have MagSafe AND Type-C charging and not MagSafe-only. I’m not an insider, just reasonable that if MagSafe comes back, Type-C will also remain as the “One Cable Docking Station” option.This is like a macrumors forum wish list.
Personally, not thrilled by MagSafe, unless you can still charge by usb-c. I have 90’ish watt USB-C chargers everywhere I need them, and it’s nice to be able to plug in any of the family’s macs, ipads, etc. when necessary.
I'm not discounting the possibility that something like the Touch Bar (specifically, non-fixed keys, however that is achieved) can improve human-computer interactions. The Touch Bar as it exists now, however, is a bloody terrible experience.Am I the only person to prefer the Touch Bar to the keys? It wasn’t ground breaking and all as they claimed it would be, but it was a step up from fixed keys that was a baggage from the mainframe era.
Unless you happen to use multiple external displays via TB3/USB-C. Every time they include a HDMI port, you lose a potential DisplayPort over TB3/USB-C display.Bringing back the USB-A and HDMI ports in addition to Type-C will be very welcome.
No, no and once again NO. If the cord is again soldered to the power supply, then this will be the end of the story. They decomposed from any impact.3. The MagSafe charging connector design is restored.
Oh, may be they could walk back on Magic Keyboard too? Back to good old Scissors with 1.3mm Key Travel.
i bet because of the new changes, Apple will lose 1 user, you, but gain 100 insteadNo, no and once again NO. If the cord is again soldered to the power supply, then this will be the end of the story. They decomposed from any impact.
And stop, i have monitors with Thunderbolt 3 at work, at home, etc... , why i should stop charging them with UCB-C to use stupid MagSafe cable once again? Really? What is going on?
The old keyboard, like on the 16th model, is worse in perception and tactile sensations than with a butterfly-type mechanism.
But what about the concern for the environment, already a dozen adapters, and here - "the guys, they are not needed". Why?
Do you know what's going on? They just couldn't do Thunderbolt 3/4 properly and end up returning to the separate port design. In which dust, dirt will clog with use. M1 cannot handle two/three displays properly, has USB spec restriction and so on.
Enough time has passed, there is no stable docker implementation, no virtualization, no Windows in bootcamp. M1 products are just a video transcoder/decoder typewriters.
Farewell Apple if this all **** is true.
not a chance...the lid being flat it has no room for 1080p and maybe on the future faceID techStill comes with a 720p front camera 😂
nope , Mark also said that magsafe is used to charge even faster your MBP.MagSafe could refer to built in MagSafe chargers to charge your phone, AirPods etc
yep, you are on something that can become true...but dont expect M2 on the 14", only on the 16"As I said in the gurman thread
the current pros have a curved bottom and lid with flat sides.
I expect the them to lose the curves and go flat with a thicker lid for 1080p, it’ll probably look like a two iPad Pros together when closed.
I want
M2
Superb display with maybe mini LED
Smaller bezels
1080p cam
Really dark space gray or black
Flat industrial iPad/iPhone design
I don’t care about MagSafe, although it could be a MagSafe charger for the port less iPhone?
not bothered about the Touch Bar but want Touch ID at least if no Face ID.
Doesn’t mean it’s true. We don’t know all the train of communications involved in these rumours getting to us, there’s plenty scope for misunderstandings along the way.nope , Mark also said that magsafe is used to charge even faster your MBP.