Not at all. Then nobody would use Apple maps . Besides, how many companies do you know that default to a competitor's product ? It isn't done.
We get a choice like web browsers ! Hah
Not at all. Then nobody would use Apple maps . Besides, how many companies do you know that default to a competitor's product ? It isn't done.
Phil stood on stage and claimed they did all of their own cartography. Only themselves to blame.
Wait a minute... those of you who do not follow actual politics, here is an explanation. Both Apple and Google are big companies and the presence of the mapping app is known by the installed user base i.e. the number of iOS users who have Apple/Google maps installed. A lot of users do not use it but these apps come by default.
Earlier when Apple was shipping Google Maps by default, the install base of google maps was directly proportional to number of iOS devices sold - no matter if people used the app or not.
But after introduction of Apple Maps, the install base of Apple Maps became proportional to number of iOS devices sold. Now since a lot of users do not use maps across the globe, they wont be installing google maps per se. Additionally casual users can happily rely on Apple Maps.
And hence Apple Maps user base is increasing with sales of iOS devices. Once it hits a number, that apple is seeking for, Apple will definitely come out with great features - enough to outnumber Google Maps.
Either you are being dishonest or you have very shallow mapping needs. Maps is OK for basic point A to point B driving directions in most (U.S.?) metropolises and near-metropolises. If that is all you need it's fine, sure.
But..
if you need walking directions -- making sure you don't use a street with no pedestrian access, forget about it.
if you want to find out what your public transportation options are to take you cross town -- no can do.
Just a couple examples of why Maps isn't going to displace Google Maps for some time to come.
Unless you spell the place exactly, it often won't produce results, whereas Google Maps, if you misspell it somewhat or sometimes phonetically, it will produce the correct result.
And, by the way, scanning wifi's was not the illegal thing Google did
50,000 people work there and they are understaffed?
Firing Scott Forstall was not an intelligent move by Apple, Apple should have had more patience wrt to iOS development.
Ping, Maps, Beats
No one needs these things from APPLE!!!!
Leave it to the experts, and focus on what APPLE is good at!
Bring us a new hardware more often!
...but it was definitely the off putting thing (others might say "creepy"), like so much of what Google does.
The issue was with how Ive and Forstall could not work together. Jobs could control them but after his death, Cook was forced to choose between them.
Maybe Cook is the weak link.
The issue was with how Ive and Forstall could not work together. Jobs could control them but after his death, Cook was forced to choose between them.
Maybe Cook is the weak link.
Perhaps, although he was handpicked by Jobs to handle the CEO position. He will never live up to his expectation by virtue of his title. We can't expect him to be Jobs. Just remain competent.
Even in 1985 when Jobs was fired, it was party a good move for the company. He was needlessly confrontational and clashed to so many people it affected company performance. A happy work environment is more important than Forstall.
There are also a multitude of reports of Forstall being an issue. Almost everybody gets on with Ive.
Perhaps, although he was handpicked by Jobs to handle the CEO position. He will never live up to his expectation by virtue of his title. We can't expect him to be Jobs. Just remain competent.
Even in 1985 when Jobs was fired, it was party a good move for the company. He was needlessly confrontational and clashed to so many people it affected company performance. A happy work environment is more important than Forstall.
There are also a multitude of reports of Forstall being an issue. Almost everybody gets on with Ive.
I'm not at all familiar with Apple's internal politics. I've often read on this forum that Cook's only weakness is not being Steve. I disagree with that. Steve is gone. Anyone in the CEO slot would not be Steve. Not possible.
I am not a Cook fan. I was very optimistic when Cook became CEO. My expectations are now very low. Just yesterday I was asking a friend about good hardware for a Windows notebook.
It's a sad thought but my next primary computer may be a Windows unit. Win is secondary here for the occasional thing that is better suited to Win.
I hope that's not necessary.
My error, I'm clearly not up to date with Google Maps. It seems it became vector based on iOS 18 months ago.
"They are having a hard time finding the right direction"
Maps works extremely well in my corner of the world -- Los Angeles. And it's much improved with new maps, etc. Apple was not going to get the turn-by-turn from Google, at the same time it was available in Android. So there was nothing to do but to develop one's own version. YOU can use Google Maps, or any number of other mapping services. So why do you care so much?
Firing Scott Forstall was not an intelligent move by Apple, Apple should have had more patience wrt to iOS development.
Here in the UK, I haven't had a problem using Maps.
...
Apple's track record for Maps is extremely poor and is very un-apple like. At this stage, they would be better off killing the project and going with another company (other then google since they don't want that).
With due respect, Apple has made a bad choice to move to its own maps without having it ready. Its still not ready and will take another few years "if they find the right direction".
Ping, Maps, Beats
No one needs these things from APPLE!!!!
Leave it to the experts, and focus on what APPLE is good at!
Bring us a new hardware more often!
+1
----------
Have Fredergi and Ive fixed Maps not that they are not disturbed by Forstall's presence?