5.0 to 5.2" is the sweet spot. 4.7 is still behind. Someone needs to shake that "innovator" guy.
if bigger means more upgrades then my gf would have left me years ago for a bigger man![]()
I think it's unlikely they'll introduce two new models. I'd buy the 5.5 inch model, but I don't expect they'd make such a significant jump. I think ~4.7 inches is next.
Ummm... Zac, we need to talk, the three of us...![]()
4.7 Would be Perfect , I made the switch from iPhone 5 to Nexus yes few compromises ( nothing I can't live without), decided to give 5S a shot yes I missed the build quality and the sharp apps/camera, but at the end of the day the screen felt too small and Retina is not a strong selling point to me anymore so the 5S went on Sale on macrumors marketplace, 4.7 and I won't hesitate to switch back![]()
if the battery life is still crap i'm going to the dark side. Sorry apple, love your stuff but I don't want to be tied to an outlet or have a huge battery case..
If you think that is bad, try an Android phone. The battery might be twice the size and capacity, but it'll die even faster.
I really don't think there will be two sizes.
I think 4.7" is pretty much the perfect size if they want to enter the larger screen segment, and there's a big enough install base to warrant it.
Anything bigger than that is getting into a very niche market, and will again demand another resolution to develop for. Highly doubt Apple would want to do that.
Around 4.7" I would certainly buy. Anything bigger wouldn't even fit in my jeans pocket, and it would be clunky as hell once you tote it inside a protective case. I've always imagined that those giant-phablet people must be carrying purses, backpacks, or man-bags all day long 24/7.
I still think that it's in Apple's best interests to keep providing the current-sized iPhones for the time being, just to see if the 4.7" size would become Apple's new default size based majority fanbase's acceptance.
I would argue that there is no 'behind' or 'sweet spot' (most phones today sell outside of that size range... how can that be sweet?).
I'm not arguing for a particular size, just one that differentiates the 6 from the 5, and every 4s user can see themselves discussing the options. That's a tough sweet spot to hit.
(Personally, I think the '6s' will be big, and the '6c' will be the same sizes as the 5c (5s CPU, no touchID), and the 5s will be the mid tier phone... And I would likely buy a 5s... while I'm a big guy with big hands, I got genetically small fat thumbs... the 4s is about my range of motion.
Around 4.7" I would certainly buy. Anything bigger wouldn't even fit in my jeans pocket, and it would be clunky as hell once you tote it inside a protective case. I've always imagined that those giant-phablet people must be carrying purses, backpacks, or man-bags all day long 24/7.
I still think that it's in Apple's best interests to keep providing the current-sized iPhones for the time being, just to see if the 4.7" size would become Apple's new default size based majority fanbase's acceptance.
I'm surecan go for less bezel and support a 5" screen in close to the same form factor as the 5S.
Larger Screen Done Right.
I'm surecan go for less bezel and support a 5" screen in close to the same form factor as the 5S.
Larger Screen Done Right.