And it comes with a warning not to slam it shutRemember when you’d slam a flip phone shut if you had a less than desirable phone conversation? Is angrily tapping a screen to end a call giving you melancholy of the good ol days?
Have I got news for you.....except now a flip phone is over $1,000![]()
And it comes with a warning not to slam it shut
wow, all the apple fan boys are out on this one
The fact is, a small subset of people (Tech reviewers) had issues with the fold, many others didn’t. It’s just that tech reviewers made a huge deal out of it on some of the largest social platforms ever.
This has nothing to do with being a first Gen product, it was destined to fail just like sapphire displays.Most likely partly due to this being a first-gen product and partly due to trying to rush the device to market to beat the competition. Hopefully there are some rock solid warranties available for these phones![]()
I’m actually surprised how well it fared when he tried to bend it backwards.who's surprised by this?
wow, all the apple fan boys are out on this one
Many others indeed didn’t have issues because that design never shipped.The fact is, a small subset of people (Tech reviewers) had issues with the fold, many others didn’t.
Here's a thought. Don't buy one.This line is absurd; a company can innovate without releasing faulty product into the world, knowingly or otherwise. That’s what R&D and testing are for. Can you catch everything? No; that’s fine, and you have to roll with those punches.
But the Galaxy Fold situation proved that Samsung was in such a hurry to show off their shiny new thing that they either skipped a lot of QA or failed to fully consider how people who didn’t understand the limitations of the technology. That’s why the Galaxy Fold and Galaxy Z Flip now come with warning labels telling you not to, for example, push the screen too hard.
That’s not innovation, that’s cheaping out on testing expenses and expecting people to pay sizable sums so that they can be the guinea pigs instead.
Ya but according to Steve Jobs, “people don’t know what they want until you show them them what they want”. Doesn’t have to be in search of a solution. Same could have been said about the Original iPhone.So many companies trying to be first to make a worthwhile foldable, and yet it remains a solution in search of a problem.
Samsung already have a phone that folds into a tablet. Any foldable phone that Apple brings out will have screens that have been developed and perfected by Samsung or another company.Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Especially when you barely can and then it breaks.
I don't see much value in a regular folding phone. Where I see value is in the phones that unfold into tablets. Apple is waiting to get it right, and once they do, other companies will copy them and then everyone will claim that Apple wasn't the first with a folding phone so Samsung and others aren't copying them. Same thing happened when they brought out the original iPhone in 2007. Apple isn't often first to market because they wait to be best to market.
Wow! How long have you had yours?The screen is garbage and normal use ruins it. The mechanism is flawed as well and it’s an overall terrible design with zero chance of success.
For Samsung it is a second-gen product...Most likely partly due to this being a first-gen product and partly due to trying to rush the device to market to beat the competition. Hopefully there are some rock solid warranties available for these phones![]()
I respect these companies more for assuming this risk and trying out new things that can fail, for the sake of moving technology forward. As long as they honor any warranties, support, etc.
That’s despite me thinking that foldable phones in this form factor might not be “forward.”