wait.. can someone explain? isn't the return to aluminum from titanium a downgrade?
Do you want a redesign for the sake of having something different? I'd rather prefer Apple to perfect their current design and material choices, rather than changing it constantly which in turn requires a significant retooling investment and ultimately, you as an end-client bear the cost of all of this. Furthermore, even if Apple completely changes the design, who cares? The vast majority of people will put a case on top of it right after unboxing and will never appreciate it. Also, there is a vast market of third-party accessories and Apple should be careful what it decides to change because it may ultimately lead to certain accessories no longer being supported and some clients may decide to hold on purchasing the new device because lack of compatibility with already purchased chargers, stands and so forth. In essence, drastic changes should be avoided. Finally, Apple's design team is not working only on the external design of the device but it is also involved in designing the software, so I'm not sure that they got bored or lazy in the recent years.It’s lipstick on a pig. At this rate, they probably felt the need to change something just for the heck of it. Their design team is probably bored out their minds.
View attachment 2494099
Does anyone know if the base iPhone 17 will feature an anti-reflective display too just like the pro models and 4K/120fps video recording?
Seasoned leaker Sonny Dickson has shared more dummy models of Apple's upcoming iPhone 17 series, with the latest lot revealing a noticeable shift in Apple's iPhone Pro model design that goes beyond the much-talked-about new rear camera bar.
![]()
Dickson points out that the iPhone 17 Pro dummy models feature an outlined area on the back, beginning just below the camera module and extending to the bottom of the chassis. Dickson says this is "where the glass will change."
According to Chinese leaker Fixed Focus Digital, the iPhone 17 Pro models will use a combination of materials — specifically, a glass section for the logo area integrated into an overall metal chassis. This explains the red areas on the iPhone 17 Pro models we saw in a previous CAD image.
According to The Information, Apple has chosen a half glass, half aluminum build for its high-end devices to increase durability. The glass would allow wireless charging to continue to be available, but a partial aluminum frame would be less prone to breakage.
![]()
Apple's current iPhone 16 Pro models feature a titanium chassis – a change Apple touted as a key upgrade when it debuted with the iPhone 15 Pro. With the introduction of the iPhone 17 lineup, Apple is reportedly planning to bring the entire selection of devices back to aluminum.
Consistent with rumors and previous CAD images, the dummies depict Apple's embrace of an elongated horizontal camera module along the top of the back of the iPhone 17 Pro models and the iPhone 17 Air, but not on the regular model. The dummies also appear to have a smoother transition between the edges of the camera bump and the back cover, reportedly owing to Apple's use of a new glass-and-metal splicing material process.
Today's dummies also indicate that all iPhone 17 models – including the all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air – will feature MagSafe. The new design will constitute one of the most significant visual changes to Apple's high-end iPhone models in recent years. The new lineup is expected to arrive in September.
Article Link: Latest iPhone 17 Pro Dummies Highlight Apple's New Part-Glass Design
If we really are going to aluminum, are we getting a price reduction as it's significantly cheaper than titanium to purchase and fabricate?
It's a weird world where MR doesn't know what half means.
Nope, and there’s a laundry list of reasons against itIs there a practical reason for the new camera bumper? Is it just to have a change?
I think we're all in for a surprise as to why there's that larger black space at the top for the camera area. Maybe there's something else hidden behind there.
in the current layout you could fit two more lenses to the right, but rearranged we could totally get 6 lenses on there!They need to throw in some more lenses or sensors for that to look good
Apple Math: Cheaper to make from Al than Ti = More profit for Apple = More money for Tim CookAfter heavy advertising the Titanium, why would they return to Aluminium on the Pro models? It scratches so easily 😭
1) If you lay it down on a desk, it would not wobble.Is there a practical reason for the new camera bumper? Is it just to have a change?
It’s lipstick on a pig. At this rate, they probably felt the need to change something just for the heck of it. Their design team is probably bored out their minds.
View attachment 2494099