Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The quality of the script was definitely a direct to streaming movie. I guess I could see the benefit of watching the effects on the big screen. But the movie wasn’t that great.

Yep pretty much. Movies like this are routine over at Netflix. However on an awful service like atv+ at least it can stand out a bit. Just goes to show how hungry people are for new content during the pandemic.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: decypher44 and Ar40
Interesting. That’s not the way it works on the tech side at all, where “sources close to Apple” aren’t reliable in the least.
[automerge]1594785051[/automerge]

Maybe we should check with IDC or Gartner. They’re good at making numbers up 🙂 But according to the article, they’re equivalent to a "a summer theatrical box office big hit."

If you want hard numbers you’ll have to hack into Eddie’s email. Grab the figures for how well the Mac Pro is selling while you’re there, and the mini too while you’re at it.
Yeah. On the tech side you want to hide your new tech from competitors and want to roll it out in a carefully controlled way. With entertainment you want to generate buzz and hype as organically as possible (as opposed to what Apple had done early on with TV+ with the formal press releases for new shows).
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickUrPoison
Watched it last weekend. Absolutely not impressed - but that’s just personal taste. I don’t like religious themes plus everything being (badly) computer animated. One would think they’d made some progress since “the perfect storm” but not so.
 
Early reviews were not great so pleasantly surprised to see it hit 80% on RT. May give it a try.
Same thing happened when The Morning Show premiered too. Critics slammed it because they wanted to make headlines by hating on Apple. Since then, some have done a complete 180. The negative reviewers will do the same thing here too.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Ar40 and decypher44
I loved the movie, however they should have spend another 10-15 minutes building up his character in the beginning. I couldnt get Captain Sulenberger out of my head for the first 20 minutes he was on the ship. Other than that I really enjoyed this movie and would have loved to see it on iMax rather than at home.
 
Exactly.

Even if every AppleTV+ viewer watched it this weekend... how many is that?

Are they really suggesting numbers similar to a Jurassic Park opening weekend?

That's the kind of movie I think of when I hear "summer theatrical box office big hit"
Jurassic Park made $50 million opening weekend. That’s about 10 million viewers at $5 for average ticket prices in 1993. Apple sold over 50 million iOS devices in 2019 meaning they have potentially 50 million viewers that still have free Apple TV+ subscriptions not including the 30% of new subscribers just for this film debut alone. Those numbers could beat Jurassic Park audience size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ar40
I see a lot of people are emphasising the need for a large screen TV. Rather than invest a lot of money in a giant TV why not simply move closer to the movie you wish to view. :)

You are welcome.
 
If you like the technicalities of hearing compass bearings multiple times, this is a movie for you!

i quite liked it, but I feel Sony got a really good deal selling it to Apple for $70m.

I would have scrapped the lacklustre love interest scene at the beginning. It doesn’t really serve any useful purpose and is not expanded upon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zen_Arcade
I think it's a bad movie, why?

* no build-up or introduction for characters
* lots of repeated yelling and screaming.
* after 16 minutus you think, whats the main story going to be, ooh this is the main story.
* no introduction of the villan, you won't get me excited from one coming through a speaker.

i can see why Sony sold this one to a streaming provider.
 
Serviceable by-the-numbers Tom Hanks fare.
A lot of people will have watched it since they're on the free 1 year Apple TV+ subscription and it's not like there's much of anything to see (certainly that's why I saw it 🤷‍♂️). In a couple of years nobody will remember this film.
 
I was part of the great DNEG VFX team on this and was a bit disappointed it did not make the Cinema
but glad people are loving it! :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Ar40
I prefer watching movies at home. None of the hassle getting there and back, having to brave bad weather etc. Just kick back, fire up the 50" & surround and enjoy. Just wish I could stop uncontrollably shredding a £20 note every time I make myself a drink!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Ar40
I watched it this past weekend. Enjoyed it. While on my comfortable couch watching it on a 4K UHD TV with Bose speakers surround sound.
 
Last edited:
The quality of the script was definitely a direct to streaming movie. I guess I could see the benefit of watching the effects on the big screen. But the movie wasn’t that great.
And it was Tom Hanks who wrote it LOL
From time to time you’d see some of those big names trying themselves in different roles as directors or screenplay writers and it doesn’t really work most of the time. I just find it nothing more than a vanity project for them. Angelina Jolie and her disastrous By The Sea, which she directed, comes to mind as well. In most cases these projects are backed up by studios in return for a “favor”. Such as acting in a big mainstream movie by the studio.
This movie is clearly an experimental effort for Hanks as a screenwriter, hence this very mediocre result.
 
I think that Jurassic Park number is domestic (US) only. It's harder to get accurate international figures, but given the overall box office split for Jurassic Park was 40:60 (domestic:international), assuming the same relationship held on international opening weekends would put the take at $125mn.

Besides, according to Bloomberg "Apple TV+ exceeded 10 million members as of February, although only about half of that number have actively used the service”. So I think 50 million is quite an overestimate.
Since we don't have any real numbers from Bloomberg or Apple, we can only be talking about potential audience size. And the comparison was Jurassic Park on opening weekend, not Jurassic Park on opening weekend in each and every country combined. Back in the 90s, there were no giant worldwide opening weekends for films yet so the U.S. box office is still the largest opening weekend number.

No one is saying Greyhound is a massive hit, not even Apple. They are saying that it is in the same ballpark as big summer releases and that they can easily see the potential for big tentpole streaming releases to dwarf traditional box office viewers in the near future the same way that streaming music has already done so.
 
I find watching movies at home much more enjoyable than in a theater. Great picture and sound quality, beer with my popcorn, AND I get to choose my company. I wouldn’t exactly call it a heartbreak.

PLUS, you don't have to listen to the inevitable yapping someone always does. (Usually seated right behind you.)
[automerge]1594840187[/automerge]
The number 72,200 presented at the end of the movie was a shock to me !

I thought I knew my History well, but apparently NOT well enough !

Yes, that was a shock. Equally shocking is the number of Russians - both civilian and military - who were killed during WWII: ~20 million.
 
Last edited:
That... doesn't make sense? I'm excluded from your comparison because I saw Jurassic Park on opening weekend in the UK?

Maybe if you similarly adjust down your Apple TV+ subscriber number estimate to just the US rather than 100+ countries, you'd get back to comparing like-for-like.
Jurassic Park was released in UK a week after the US premiere. The comparison was opening weekend. So unless you have access to all the numbers over time of both movies, this comparison is stupid.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.