Well, for one thing, a user-replaceable battery might mean the device is less water-resistant.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Leaked Documents Suggest Apple Could Be Forced to Build iPhones With User-Removable Batteries in Europe
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It's good that the EU is forcing Apple to do the right thing. In the name of providing best experience, Apple is trying to make money on repairs, given their repair prices are outlandish...
Because a lot of extending battery life tricks are only possible because of non user removable batteries. The phones will also be thicker.
The idea is that instead of having the e-Waste of an entire phone after a year or two, however long your battery lasts, you can replace the battery. Since it's not expected to be handled like your AA or 9 volt battery, you can keep the current battery envelope. There's no need to make the battery extra-durable. It's just like how we expect adults to be able to be responsible around gasoline or fertilizer.
Personally, I don't find iPhones that heavy. Sorry for being rude, but people saying that they are remind me of that one Simpsons episode where Mr. Burns struggles lifting up a fortune cookie, telling Mr. Smithers "It seems heavy, like there's paper in it!"
I think people conflate the two factors here. Possible intra-day augmenting capacity swaps due to deploeting a single cycle, and longer term service replacement as its capacity diminishes from use.
The poster you responded actually seemed to address both of those. They have no need for intra-day swapping after 3 years. Sounds pretty good and likely exceeds the expected life-span of the rest of the device for most users. I would guess this change would hurt a lot of users as it would trade cost and/or capacity for something that is not need.
Excellent idea. Billions of consumers tossing all their used phone batteries into landfill.
They can. But after the back is opened for the first time, all bets would be off as far as waterproofing.
weird. My go pro is waterproof, tiny and I can take out the battery and Sd card for that matter just fine
What the EU should do is create an EU phone specification that qualifies for tax / VAT discounts, subsidies or rebates and allow manufacturers to voluntary manufacture and sell phones that meet the EU specs. Of course the EU can't and won't leave any potential revenue on the table and would rather compromise consumer choice and product innovation.
Have fun with your fat, water-absorbing iPhones, Europe!
Or Apple could just say no and the EU can go without iPhones.
And the go pro is fatter and heavier than it needs to be because of that
Here you go smarty-pants European Union; your smart phones will now be redesigned to use six of these....
It's bad because it is impossible to make the phone water proof if the user can change the battery (or at least for it to be water proof afterwards). It reduces battery life, because a user replaceable battery must be in a rigid enclosure to be handled by an end user, because there must be a mechanism to safely remove the battery and safely insert a new one that is usable by an end user without special tools, and because it is much harder to fill all available space in a phone with battery because user-replaceable batteries can't come in arbitrary spaces.
It’s really not a bad thing. But some will have a fit
Because it's forcing manufacturers to design around a minority of use cases, to the detriment of the majority.
To be certain, if you make something easier to upgrade or replace, more people will upgrade or replace that component; this is generally a good thing.
But even in the halcyon days of expandable Macs where you could swap RAM easily, or batteries, or storage... most people *never did.* Most people treat their phones as disposable after two or three years; that wouldn't change even if they could throw in a new battery.
As mentioned, designing your phone around an easily swappable battery to be serviced by non-tech people means a massive potential set of tradeoffs that are antithetical to everything else people want in their phones. If everyone wanted removable batteries or headphone jacks or the like, those would be mainstream features instead of dwindling from all handsets.
Remember those modular phone concepts where you were going to be able to replace camera modules or SoCs? It never happened because it was a terrible idea divorced from the reality of how people use their phones.
Rubbish - if the UK was still in the EU when this came about, it would have had a vote (and you through your MEP, unless that MEP was Brexit and never in Brussels) on the matter. As it is, if it does happen UK will either get the same type of phone as Europe or the same glued together one that the rest of the world will get.
And after that do the same with MBPs too, EU. Thx!
Why are non-eu-user offended by this? You will still get your iPhones as before, don't worry.
Why are non-eu-user offended by this? You will still get your iPhones as before, don't worry.
There are comparable because both not gonna happen
EU doesnt thing about world ? this is a bad thing for pollution and recycle...think about all those kids who will throw away thousands of battery when they exchange....Nowadays you have to exchange at apple service, and the service will take care of the used battery
Doesn’t make a difference. Apple won’t guarantee water resistance anyway
Absolutely not. About half of the UK decided to leave the EU because they didn't want any foreigners to come to Britain. (And now they are getting twice as many, but from India, Pakistan etc. instead of from the EU).