Cheaper for a tourist, or in terms of % income that everything costs to a local working there on an average salary?Yes the EU is cheaper overall, I said it before.
Cheaper for a tourist, or in terms of % income that everything costs to a local working there on an average salary?Yes the EU is cheaper overall, I said it before.
By the way, that data is what CNBC use...Thanks for a laugh. I needed that. Poor internet data, from 2019 (2-3 years old) and listing a number of EU countries as cheaper than the US, yet you claim 'I won the argument' ???
Because I don't need to appease an internet troll.By the way, that data is what CNBC use...
I have yet to see anything better from you, or in fact anything at all?
The first part is ok as that is how it is implemented in Android also. Regarding the second part, it is not happening. Unless Apple is ok being fined a minimum of 4% (upto a maximum of 20%) of their global revenue, they cannot stop the sideloaded apps access to any APIs that the first-party apps can access. So, denying access to contacts database etc., is ruled out.
This is simply about Apple trying to protect their unjustified revenue cut due to a monopoly on iOS app distribution
They have a monopoly on software distribution on iOS -- that is the issue
Even Microsoft on the Windows store only charges 12% and they're pretty greedy. EPIC on their store charges 12% also and that goes as low as just 5% if you use the EPIC's game engine (Unreal Engine) in your game. It's funny, other stores give discounts to use their API's and Frameworks but Apple charges you the same regardless.
How much do you pay for health insurance? What about rent? What about …
Fuel is obviously much more expensive in the EU because it’s a net importer of oil and natgas and it carries a lot of taxes too, like 100%Fuel? Petrol/diesel/gasoline.
That’s harder to answer without some research tbhCheaper for a tourist, or in terms of % income that everything costs to a local working there on an average salary?
But what he fails to appreciate is how much less we drive compared to the US. So whilst it is much more expensive, the overall picture balances out. My car insurance in Europe is a fraction of that in the US.Fuel is obviously much more expensive in the EU because it’s a net importer of oil and natgas and it carries a lot of taxes too, like 100%
Bolded:The EU needs to be disbanded. They have no idea what they’re doing 99% of the time, especially with regards to tech.
There’s a reason there are so few tech juggernauts in Europe. Companies flee to the USA where there are fewer onerous regulations.
Holy Jezz!I live in Sweden. 50% of my paycheck goes straight to the taxman, and then I pay 25% in sales tax (depending on the goods). Our health care is really cheap.
When a family member bought insurance on the exchange it was about $200/month.
Agreed. The reason this topic has bugged me and why I'm replying to everyone on it is because I did some research on it a couple of years ago, when I started working remotely and had to contemplate where to base myself. There's ups and downs everywhere, but you have to consider the broad picture, and if you ignore stuff like varying salaries and tax rates you get a skewed impression.That’s harder to answer without some research tbh
Not that simple. My role in Europe vs my role in the US with the same company, my effective tax rate is identical due to the higher salary in the US.Like the other chap said, Portugal is a lovely country that isn't seemingly expensive to an American or Brit, but the tax rates are very high. America offers low tax and incredibly cheap housing in many areas by Western European standards, and amazingly cheap fuel, but healthcare and education are prohibitive in terms of raising a family there. England is a ****-show all around cost wise, though at least Scotland offers free higher education. The list goes on.
and what are they suposed to do? what law do you think they can chalenge it on? there is no constitution to challenge it on. this is the equivalent of chalenging a constitutional amendment. good luck to keep it tied up as it will be enforcable from day oneUm…have you heard of courts?
thats becasue the is nothing for the EUCJ to interpret or challenge it on. only a parlamentary action can remove the lawAs far as my reading the various articles regarding the EU DMA regulation, once passed, the law cannot be challenged in the sense that it cannot be reversed or stopped.
What will be more interesting is how many of these MEPs will fall foul to their own making. Installing spyware or suspect apps and leaking their personal info and more online.You WILL have the government surveil and intercept your communications, you WILL have the government censor and detain you for wrongthink, you WILL parrot the prevailing government propaganda of the day, and if you don't you WILL have a jackboot of the EU police state on your throat
I doubt Apple could spin their reluctance to much of what is proposed in a positive light, and I doubt many people would take to the streets. Even if they do, what good would it do - it's not like politicians really listen to the population much, and unlike a national government, I am not sure how many would care about retaining their seat as an MEP.IF Apple were to stop seliing iPhones in Europe or pull out of Europe with the App Store how would Apple customers (in Europe) take this?
How mad would iPhone users be at being forced to buy an Android phone next time round? Or being forced to sell their iPhone for dirt cheap because they can’t buy anything on the App Store when Apple refuses to back down? Would there be any political blowback from the masses?
Pretty broad coverage. No deductible but copays from$45 to $125. I paid $250 for an emergency room plus ambulance with my coverage. No insurance would have been $5000. A lot depends on your insurance provider.What’s coverage? What about deductibles?
It depends on the drugs. In the EU my drug is 50,000% more expensive than in the US. The good thing with Europe is it's more evenly priced so it balances out well for all.Pretty broad coverage. No deductible but copays from$45 to $125. I paid $250 for an emergency room plus ambulance with my coverage. No insurance would have been $5000. A lot depends on your insurance provider.
I agree the US really needs to address healthcare costs, including fixing drug prices to that other countries pay for US drugs. Without insurance you are SOL, which is shameful.
That sounds great. And i can bet that EU and even Germany themselves will not even say a word.I think the USA should require that all European cars sold in the US come with a full sized spare tire. If not face steep fines.
Also all European cars should have wheels with lug patterns that match with the most popular vehicle sold in America, the Ford F150. This is a safety issue, incase a BMW driver gets a flat, the most common driver in America can lend them a spare tire.
It's about providing flexibility and choice for consumers and developers on the iOS software platform.
nope they wont. they havent done it with android, windows, MacOS and linux. so we can expect iOS to be the sameell-oh-ell.
If you think governments won't simply block the App Store and force people to use a government approved one, you're delusional.
thats also completely fin considering EU wants to implement apples privacy rules but for everyone.I would be ok with this - the only problem is that there would be a power shift from Apple to the third party company instead of the user. For example, imagine that Facebook would pull out of the AppStore and would only be available via direct download. Now you have a app that is forcing you to turn on that toggle if you want Facebook.
Should then there be a law that prevents this from happening? That if you used to have an app in the AppStore that you must keep providing that same app via the original store for the users that do not want the toggle on? Who has the power now?
What if Facebook changes name - Meta - and now says that it is a brand new app/company thus allowing to circumvent that law?
that is a fundamental misunderstanding you and many keep having. no one protocol to rule them all, but a minimum standard that will be implemented. that is what regulations do. they implement what you need to meet; the rest can be better in any shape or form as long as the original thingsI do like your comment. But there is a difference between creating a standard and forcing that standard to be the only way to communicate. We already have communication standards - called text messaging, email.
Both iOS and Android allow you to use these between devices without a problem.
Instead of forcing one and only standard, why not come up with a new standard but not make it the only way?
It would be then up to the consumers to use that standard if good enough.
Like I had to instead WhatsApp to message other people. It was my choice to do so if I wanted to communicate to those people without. I could have text messaged or emailed them.
I do agree that having a lot of messaging apps is annoying and that new standards could exist for web instant messaging - but this should not be the only one. It could be mandatory for any mobile communications device to support them (not sure if text message is mandatory). It would then be up to the user to start using that or not.