So you agree with me?I don't need to google, I live in both.
The EU needs to be disbanded. They have no idea what they’re doing 99% of the time, especially with regards to tech.
There’s a reason there are so few tech juggernauts in Europe. Companies flee to the USA where there are fewer onerous regulations.
You have provided a quote that gives you the answer you need, it speaks to groceries, not eating out. I can do a weekly shop in Europe for the cost of getting a few recipe ingredients in the US.So you agree with me?
It would appear if you do not agree with me, your anecdotal experiences aren't indicative of the wider picture across two very large areas.
"US consumers also spend a smaller share of their budget on groceries versus those in other countries. Last year, the share of household budgets devoted to food was 7.1% in the US; it was higher in European countries like the UK (9.4%), Germany (11.7%), France (15%), Spain (15%), and Italy (16.5%), according to Euromonitor International, a London-based market research firm."
![]()
US families spend far less on food than those in Europe, but for how much longer?
More expensive labor and supply chain disruptions are leading to higher grocery costs for US consumers, who are used to spending less of their budget on groceries versus those in other countries.qz.com
While the differences in food shopping are currently large, that article explains the gap is starting to diminish.
I shared some stats. Your turn.No. The guy you were answering to.
So you live in an expensive bit of America and a cheap part of Europe? Honestly, stop pretending you know what you're talking about in terms of the bigger picture. It's silly to just make **** up because of your experiences as one person in a couple of specific areas.You have provided a quote that gives you the answer you need, it speaks to groceries, not eating out. I can do a weekly shop in Europe for the cost of getting a few recipe ingredients in the US.
No, I live in a cheap state and a not cheap part of Europe. The only pretender here is the Googler.So you live in an expensive bit of America and a cheap part of Europe? Honestly, stop pretending you know what you're talking about in terms of the bigger picture. It's silly to just make **** up because of your experiences as one person in a couple of specific areas.
I live in Sweden. 50% of my paycheck goes straight to the taxman, and then I pay 25% in sales tax (depending on the goods). Our health care is really cheap.I shared some stats. Your turn.
Real estate, food, fuel, etc are all much cheaper in America than the EU, as a percentage of income. Mostly much cheaper in general. If you disagree, I'd like to see you produce some evidence to back it up.
At least we all agree health care is more expensive in America.
[...]
Health care and education. Comparatively.I live in Sweden. 50% of my paycheck goes straight to the taxman, and then I pay 25% in sales tax (depending on the goods). Our health care is really cheap.
I've lived all over the world too. Hooray for you and me.No, I live in a cheap state and a not cheap part of Europe. The only pretender here is the Googler.
I've lived all over the world and in multiple places in Europe.
This is still a pick your posion situation. If it's cheap enough anyone "can" do it. The bar of entry is low. If its too expensive (which is a relative situation), then yes you could get better development because it weeds out those just messing around and they don't have the resources to make a quality app. But, it also gets rid of opportunity for those willing to take a chance.I was just being facetious because of what the poster said to me originally. I don't think the developer fees just for wanting to publish an application should increase. I think they met a nice balance between making it accessible and making it deter low effort software submissions.
Agreed.Correct there's still choice with or without these laws.
Porn.There are entire classes of app that Apple simply will not allow on the iPhone.
Most likely for good reason.And there are many private frameworks they have which their own software can use but that no other software is allowed to use (your app will get rejected if you try).
Yup, for good reason. Why not just give you source code and just have at it? Apple built walls in the garden. We know this. We can argue if this is good bad or whatever, but it's for a purpose. Again, no one is forcing anyone to do anything with Apple.Let me give you an example. Perhaps you prefer Google Assistant instead of Siri. But you cannot choose to have that assistant on an iPhone in the same way you can on an Android phone. You cannot re-assign the side button or which digital assistant pops up when you say "Hey Siri". But through sideloading which would require certain parts of the operating system are made more accessible to developers we could remap buttons, swap which apps launch when words are said aloud and so forth.
And I understand this, however. Big however here. Apple built this. They get to decide what to do with it. If anyone doesn't like it, petition them. Or stop developing for it. If enough developers stopped developing for the platform. Guess what happens? People will buy Android since that is where the apps are, and Apple will have to either adapt to win you back OR they go away. AKA fail.Now you mentioned what I said about third party stores on Android and how it's hard to turn a profit on them. But that is just part of the leaked directive. It's also about allowing proper competition on the device (for instance with the Siri example above) and also monetary competition, meaning I don't have to use Apple's own payment systems, I can take on that burden myself so I don't have to pay Apple 30% of my revenue.
Yes, I agree. People will try it. Then get burned, and complain to Apple.And to be honest I do think a 3rd party store on Apples devices would be successful especially if it's run by the developer community (similar to Cydia but more professional).
And how much of that will get passed on to people like me? Willing to say ZERO. I'm going with zero. And even if it saves me a few dollars on the top end (how much are apps these days?). At what cost? There are no free lunches here. It may cost you less to make an App and maybe save me a buck or two here and there. But, at the cost of a less secure iOS? Multiple vendors to deal with when there is an issue? Again, pick your poison.As there is so much room to reduce prices. It literally costs 1.5% to 2.5% to process a bank card online. But Apple is charging 15% to 30% when you sell an app through them. A store that had a 4%, 5% or 7.5% cut would still be drastically cheaper than Apple and able to turn a huge profit.
You do have the ability to not develop on the platform right? I mean it sounds like you're not making a profit.Wouldn't you like apps you use even cheaper whilst the developer still gets paid more? etc I don't like giving Apple $300,000 out of every $1,000,000 I generate in revenue (not profit). They take more money from my company every year than sales taxes in any jurisdiction worldwide it's crazy, honestly crazy.
Take education costs into account and the EU easy wins, in Germany it’s free, even the university.I have dual citizenship EU/US, not that it means that I know everything about both sides, but I would say buying an apartment is a similar effort due to mortgages being cheaper in the EU, although my experience may be skewed.
In nominal terms the EU is cheaper
Are you saying it's not actually cheap, because you pay so much in tax?I live in Sweden. 50% of my paycheck goes straight to the taxman, and then I pay 25% in sales tax (depending on the goods). Our health care is really cheap.
Take education costs into account and the EU easy wins, in Germany it’s free, even the university.
Parents don’t need to go bankrupt to offer their kids a good education.
Depends where in each place. London, Munich, Paris, New York are all insanely expensive in terms of real estate.I have dual citizenship EU/US, not that it means that I know everything about both sides, but I would say buying an apartment is a similar effort due to mortgages being cheaper in the EU, although my experience may be skewed.
In nominal terms the EU is cheaper
Fuel? Petrol/diesel/gasoline.Yes the EU is cheaper overall, I said it before.
Even more if you compare big metro areas. I think the largest in the EU are Paris, Madrid and Berlin, and those are worlds apart from NY or the Bay Area. Not that they’re cheap, but still.
I shared some stats. Your turn.
Real estate, food, fuel, etc are all much cheaper in America than the EU, as a percentage of income. Mostly much cheaper in general. If you disagree, I'd like to see you produce some evidence to back it up.
At least we all agree health care is more expensive in America.
We are a high functioning socialist country. Nothing is free. But when my mom had cancer we just got an appointment, I don't have the slightest idea what it did cost. We and everybody else paid for it. Now I'm paying for someone else's moms care. It's nice not to worry about money when everything else is darkness.Are you saying it's not actually cheap, because you pay so much in tax?
Agreed on education. It's ridiculous in America. It's bad enough in England.Take education costs into account and the EU easy wins, in Germany it’s free, even the university.
Parents don’t need to go bankrupt to offer their kids a good education.
Thanks for a laugh. I needed that. Poor internet data, from 2019 (2-3 years old) and listing a number of EU countries as cheaper than the US, yet you claim 'I won the argument' ???I've lived all over the world too. Hooray for you and me.
Anyway, here's some more research that's been conducted. If it wasn't for cheap EU alcohol prices the divide would be wider. But anyway. I've won the argument, no need to continue this further.View attachment 1995622