If they're using the 5S internals, why not just buy a 5S now if you're waiting on this? They're both 4 inch phones but one uses quality materials like aluminum. So silly.
Because this '6c' will be $100 cheaper than what the 5s costs today.
If they're using the 5S internals, why not just buy a 5S now if you're waiting on this? They're both 4 inch phones but one uses quality materials like aluminum. So silly.
The 5c didn't get the 5s internals when the 6 was released. If Apple wanted the 'c' to be a plastic-clad version of the previous year's model, that's what they would have done last September. Plans change, maybe they originally planned to do the former but lower sales caused them to push the 'c' version into the -2 gen bracket.The 5c got the iPhone 5 internals. Why wouldn't the 6c get the 6 internals?
I think the 6c will more be like the iPhone 5 and be 4in with upgraded internals.
Going forward taht would make sense
6s+ = 5.5in
6s = 4.7in
6c = 4.0in
Because this '6c' will be $100 cheaper than what the 5s costs today.
The 5c didn't get the 5s internals when the 6 was released. If Apple wanted the 'c' to be a plastic-clad version of the previous year's model, that's what they would have done last September. Plans change, maybe they originally planned to do the former but lower sales caused them to push the 'c' version into the -2 gen bracket.
Which is, of course, the MOST important thing about a phone![]()
Not really. They will both be the same cost.
If they're using the 5S internals, why not just buy a 5S now if you're waiting on this? They're both 4 inch phones but one uses quality materials like aluminum. So silly.
The fricking point is that while the 5c was the -1 gen phone when it was introduced, that step was not repeated the next year.The poster said 5, not 5s, and he was more or less correct.
I thought maybe you'd read something or seen some rumours. Didn't realise your statement was purely your opinion.
Way to screw over the people who want a 4 inch iphone. Stupid tim cook! FIRE HIM ALREADY!
I thought the 5c was generally considered a failure? Well, in Apple's terms...they still sold millions.
Nope. It makes sense for Apple to use the A8 (iPhone 6 internals).
Here's why:
- The 5c had a 2-year lifecycle. Apple are probably planning the same for this model, so it makes sense to give it a chip that won't be utterly obsolete in 2 years time.
- The screen size is already a huge differentiator between the "c" models and the premium models. Even if the A9 turns out to only be a modest improvement over the A8, many users will be happy to pay more for a premium model because of the screen size.
- By the time the 6c rolls out, there is unlikely to be much difference in cost between producing A7 vs A8 chips. It might actually be cheaper to produce A8 chips due to the smaller die size, and economies of scale. (New Apple TV will likely use A8?)
- The A8 is more power efficient, so the 6c will have better battery life for a given battery size if it uses it.
- The 5c got the iPhone 5 internals. Why wouldn't the 6c get the 6 internals?
If this is the only 4" iPhone i can get at the end of the year, I'll still buy as long as the camera is OK.
I'm a bit over the 6's size, though the camera is good.
Uh...how have you been screwed over?
Who promised you a cutting edge 4" phone?
I thought the 5c was generally considered a failure? Well, in Apple's terms...they still sold millions.
"And so the mix was stronger to the 5S, and it took us some amount of time in order to build the mix that customers were demanding.
"And as a result, we lost some sales of units for part of the quarter in North America and relative to the world, it took us the bulk of the quarter, almost all the quarter, to get the iPhone 5S into proper supply."
- Tim Cook Q1 2014 call
If the 6c is basically a 6 with a plastic shell, I don't see it selling very well...
But if it's actually better, in some incredible way, I might be tempted to upgrade. I wonder if there will be a 6c+ or 6+c in plastic...
You mean like the 5c being the same cost as the 5? Except that it wasn't.