Freedom entails responsibility, or at least it used to...
Unfortunately, America has fostered an environment which spits upon personal responsibility ... some bigger force always has to be at fault.
Freedom entails responsibility, or at least it used to...
Am I the only one who thinks that an 11 year old should have already studied World War II in school and known what a holocaust is?
I mean, it certainly wouldn't have upset me when I was 11. How sheltered ARE your kids? I also used the word "crap" on a daily basis back then.
This whole thread is hilarious. The screenshots are the icing on the cake, LOL.
Where is the age requirement for having an Ipod Touch? I sure have looked everywhere and I cant find one. Should they have put on on their products. No i don't think thy should it's about as harmless (marketing) as Mickey Mouse until you dig deeper into its features like I have found out. What would be more costly to put an age restriction on a product or to moderate a forum.
Again, i'm not bashing at Apple.
i am not saying that you should not act upon the situation, simply that you are acting upon it in a way that shifts all the responsibility and accountability to apple and others.
instead of making the tough decision in the beginning and not buying an ipod touch for your 11 year old son (because he could access content you deem inappropriate) you caved because he got good grades and YOU couldnt say "no".
now that you caved in and your son has unsurprisingly seen mature content on the internet (shocking i know), you are looking to shift the parenting responsibility and accountability to apple. you are looking for apple to step up and do something because you dont want to make your son mad at you for taking away his ipod touch.
sure you could wait for apple to act, or you could do it.
Personally I find it disturbing that you find your 11 years old son asking about Holocaust disturbing.Holocaust is taught in World History. I took World History in 9th grade. 11 year-old is around 5th-6th grade.
You cannot ask a child to study hard at school for a reward and then say no when they achieve their goal.
Thats absurd.
You cannot ask a child to study hard at school for a reward and then say no when they achieve their goal.
Thats absurd.
You cannot ask a child to study hard at school for a reward and then say no when they achieve their goal.
Thats absurd.
Ok, wait a second here.
A few things don't add up for me here.
You seem to have your own iPhone, and enough knowledge to not only find the posts that you find offensive, but to take screen caps, and attach them to a post in a forum....yet you're completely floored when your 11 year old figures out how to find dirty words on the app store?
First of all...why would you buy your 11 year old anything without properly researching it to make sure it's safe?
I agree that Apple should moderate the reviews, but you can't blame Apple for you not paying attention. The fact is that as a parent it is your responsibility to understand what you are giving to your children and what implications that has.
So, my point is that sending letters to Apple regarding the questionable posts is completely legit, but adding in your personal failings as a parent doesn't exactly help solidify your point. Take the necessary steps to protect your child, and if the device(s) you're giving him are giving him access to questionable material, then perhaps you need to do your homework before you go around blaming others for not doing theirs.
Personally I find it disturbing that you find your 11 years old son asking about Holocaust disturbing.
Too far on the right? Perhaps moving little to the left is what you need.
Age restriction of an iPod Touch? None, its yours (the parent) to set up. If you child wants one and you don't want him to know or have a mishap like this, then say no, you are too young. He will hate you or he will be smart to understand, but you know better, you are the parent after all.
You cannot ask a child to study hard at school for a reward and then say no when they achieve their goal.
Thats absurd.
2. Age requirements for use of the Service. This Service is available for individuals aged 13 years or older. If you are 13 or older but under the age of 18, you should review these terms and conditions with your parent or guardian to make sure that you and your parent or guardian understand these terms and conditions.
3. Objectionable Material. You understand that by using the Service, you may encounter content that may be deemed offensive, indecent, or objectionable, which content may or may not be identified as having explicit language. Nevertheless, you agree to use the Service at your sole risk and that Apple shall have no liability to you for content that may be found to be offensive, indecent, or objectionable. Content types (including genres, sub-genres and Podcast categories and sub-categories and the like) and descriptions are provided for convenience, and you acknowledge and agree that Apple does not guarantee their accuracy.
Personally i'm asking, would you rather have an app store with comments like that on or one without. You answer will say a lot about you.
Kind of like when parents complain about television programming.
"I am appalled because I walked in on my kid and he was watching this show that uses such horrible language. The TV network should be ashamed."
Never mind that the parent should have had exercised the discretion about which programming the child watched and had a choice to not let them watch a certain channel.
I understand some content is in poor taste, but Apple is marketing to a vast audience. Their business structure does not revolve around the OP's mores and beliefs about content. Accordingly, the OP is aware of this and should demonstrate parental discretion following his/her beliefs instead of blaming Apple.
Personally I find it disturbing that you find your 11 years old son asking about Holocaust disturbing.
Too far on the right? Perhaps moving little to the left is what you need.
LOL. what if he had asked for a subscription to playboy? would you have said no then?
also regarding the whole ipod touch age requirements thing, your complaint seems to be about the app store and the comments. the app store is a part of itunes, which has a "TERMS OF SERVICE".
http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/us/terms.html#SERVICE
whoops.
You sir are using this to your advantage and stirring things big time
I asked what apps he was looking at then when he went to bed we looked at them on my iphone.
It's as an when on the app store. Some apps have great comments some dont. How can i research what goes on when an app that was released last week has fine comments but an app this week has profanity all over it, it changes constantly thus need for moderation.
Personally i'm asking, would you rather have an app store with comments like that on or one without. You answer will say a lot about you
LOL. what if he had asked for a subscription to playboy? would you have said no then?
also regarding the whole ipod touch age requirements thing, your complaint seems to be about the app store and the comments. the app store is a part of itunes, which has a "TERMS OF SERVICE".
http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/us/terms.html#SERVICE
whoops.