It's so great to hear that LE users of all other DAWs whine about features too. Apparently it isn't a Protools exclusive feature. I have always wondered why on earth people think that companies should give their assets to everyone for free! While I do realise that not everyone can afford the full product and the companies are kind of forced to sell crippled versions, I don't seem to understand why 100 dollar customer should get same benefits than 10 grand customer.
LE people should be happy about being able to use the software in the first place! If the limitations are too much, then maybe that user has outgrown the 100 dollar customer status and needs to fork out money to become a 10 grand customer? Feel like still wanting to be 100 dollar customer? Fine, just use the 100 dollar software and be fine with it. Want to use the 10 grand software? Fine, just pay the money and use it. Do not whine.
Companies have to charge money to be able to continue developing the software which you as user need to be updated every now and then. Supporting the company which products one uses is not an option. Failing to support the company makes the company not develop the software and therefore it makes you as user not use the software when the time comes that the software does not work with current systems. If you're not in the business of making money by using the software, then you do not *need* to use the 10 grand software. If you are, you do not whine about the tool that makes you money.
Whiners. Shut up already!
(Protools LE has 18 i/o limitation. While it's six channels more than 12, it's still rather severe limitation. It is there for a reason. Protools HD on the other hand, it is a modular system and the limitations are rather far away just the way Logic Pro has. You get what you pay for.)
With all due respect, this is crap (well, you did tell me to shut up!)
If Apple wants to give us LE as is, that's fine. BUT, why aren't they upfront with it? Why is an "aux" called an "aux" for both LE and LP? They don't DO the same thing, and that's not obvious until you actually use the product. Same for bus objects.
I'm not as critical of the 12 i/o limit, because Apple is upfront with that. Plus, most LE users don't need more than 12 ins/outs at the same time, and if they do, they're probably better suited to LP than LE. HOWEVER, I do get steamed that I cannot choose WHICH 12 ins and outs I can use. This isn't a silly matter, either: if I own a mid-level interface like a TC Konnekt 24D, 4 analog ins, 2 S/PDIF, 8 ADAT (total is 14 ins), in LE, I can only use 6, because I can't use the ADATs at ALL. Same with the MOTU 828, or any other interface with ADAT. I'd love to be able to JUST use the ADAT i/o (8 in/out), but LE doesn't allow that; you only have access to the FIRST 12 inputs.
And the other point is that the value of the extra plugs/instruments in LP has an established value; Emagic sold them as separate products, and they are worth FAR more than the difference between LE and LP. If that were the ONLY difference, I wouldn't be complaining. even if Apple crippled the Auxes, busses, and i/o structure and were honest about it, I wouldn't be mad because I wouldn't have bought LE. But LP is a fantastic value, and LE is a fantastically crippled product, designed solely to get the user to upgrade.
What I'd really like to see is some middle ground product, like Emagic used to offer. I'd pay double the price of LE to have the bus, aux, and i/o structure of LP (minus TDM/HD compatibility). Strip LP of its built-in plugs/instruments, give us the LE equivalents, and I'd be happy. Incidentally, that sequencer would compete VERY well, since it would still have a feature set as good or better than DP, Live, or Cubase. And it wouldn't canibalize LP users, because I would imagine that a lot of frustrated LE users are moving to these other DAWs, rather than moving to LP; that's what I'm going to do soon if Apple doesn't improve LE. The cross-grade to DP isn't that much, and I'd get to use all of my i/o, and have proper busses.