I would consider that fate, because Jacob was super human so that's like being chosen by the gods. But that's debatable.We know that Jacob choose each person to bring to the island. It wasn't fate.
I would consider that fate, because Jacob was super human so that's like being chosen by the gods. But that's debatable.We know that Jacob choose each person to bring to the island. It wasn't fate.
I would consider that fate, because Jacob was super human so that's like being chosen by the gods. But that's debatable.
Mr. Eko was not a candidate, therefore, the smoke monster was allowed to kill him.
So are characters that were in the sideways world but not present at the church real? In other words, Danielle and Alex (the two characters I'm actually thinking of most as I ask this) are obviously dead in island world and obviously present in sideways world. Are they there because it's their afterlife selves (which we know is the case with Jack, Kate, Sawyer, Locke, Ben, etc) or because they were just conjured out of thin air to fill a purpose (Jack's son).
We know the flash-sideways world is an afterlife, purgatory, whatever-you-want-to-call-it. That's established.
However, some characters in the afterlife never died. Unless I missed the episode where Hugo died...
To quote Christian: "Everyone dies."
Hurley and Ben didn't die on screen, but they died in the future, and that's why they were there (and also why Hurley was able to tell Ben he was a "good No. 2" since they had those shared experiences together which we never got to see as TV viewers, but which occurred before they died and ended up in sideways world.)
Early Reflections on the Lost Finale
A friend from my high school days, Mikki Fleniken, asked me on FaceBook what I thought of the Lost finale. After some pondering last night and then sleeping on it, here are my initial thoughts. I wrote most of this on FaceBook, but decided it might go well here, too.
Mikki asked me, What was real and what was not??!! Here is my initial answer.
All along the writers had said that the events on the island were not a dream, not hell and not purgatory.
But what threw me was the final scene and then the last shot. The final scene, of course, being that they were all dead and gathered in the church. And then, the final shot showed the airplane wreckage which made me think that perhaps they had all died in the airplane wreck at the very beginning of the show six years ago. That would have been a bit of a cheat to me, but that was my immediate thought right as the show ended.
But after reflecting on things for a couple of hours afterwards, and listening to the initial exchange between Jimmy Kimmel and Matthew Fox on Kimmels sendoff show last night (ironically, the rest of the actors seemed clueless about much of the show), and then sleeping on it, I believe my initial conclusions were wrong.
If everyone died in the initial plane crash, then the writers simply lied for six years in all of their interviews. Lets assume this is not the case and that the passengers of Oceanic 815 did not die in the crash.
Therefore, everything that happened on the island was real, but the writers did play a bit of a trick on us in that the flash-sideways of season six, was in fact, a kind of purgatory (for lack of a better word).
Part of the key is to go back and listen to Christian Shepherds explanation to Jack at the end. This is the place that all of you made together, so that you could find one another. The people in the church had formed an inseparable bond with each other due to the events that had taken place on the islanda bond that lasted even into death. This was the outcome of Jacks first season speech We either live together, or we die alone. Because they had chosen to live together, they were now united even in death.
Note that Michael wasnt there. He had betrayed them. We had already learned he was still on the island, like a ghost unable to move on. Ben was invited to the church, but didnt feel like he was quite readyeven though he had been made aware of what was happening. Theres really a lot of emphasis on SELF-redemption in the show as opposed to the redemption of Christ, although there was certainly a strong emphasis on elements of Christian tradition throughout the show.
There had been hints to the reality of the flash-sideways existence, though. Eloise Hawking/Widmore, who seemed to be more in the know than anyone, in both the real world and the afterlife, was very concerned that her son Daniel not be awakened just yet, no doubt because she felt guilt over killing him and wanted more time with him. Why she couldnt get that time together with him in eternity is a question I cant answer.
Plus, all of their lives were a bit idealized based on what they would have hoped for in life. Hurley was lucky, not unlucky. Locke had a good relationship with his father (there was a picture of them together in an earlier episode this season) and his fiance, Helen. Jack was a successful surgeon and had a son with Juliet, whom he got along with well, even though they were divorced. Sawyer was on the right side of the law instead of the wrong side. The only ones who didnt seem to have it so well were Kate and Sayid, but I suppose the particulars could be played with and argued.
Thus, I presume that when the plane left the island with Lapidus, Kate, Sawyer, Miles, Richard, and Claire, it really did leave and they would have lived the rest of their lives off the island. More evidence of thisHurley told Ben at the church that Ben had made a very good Number 2, which implies they went on to have a full life with other experiences and adventures on the island.
Were the bigger questions of the show answered? Not really. Exactly what was the energy source of the island and what was the island itself? Who originally made all the rules? We dont know. The writers said that they were not intending to answer all the questions.
There had been speculation for years that Lost was based on some kind of ancient mythology, and while there are certainly elements and themes from various mythologies, in the end, the writers seemed to be writing a new mythology for the island all on its own.
So, the energy source becomes something symbolic and not specific.
That will be enough for some viewers, but not for others. Some of the folks who wanted very specific answers will be disappointed. Others, who can live without having every single question answered will be fine and perhaps enjoy some of the debate as to what these things mean.
But what do you really want? One of the most disappointing scenes Ive ever seen in cinema was the whole scientific explanation of the Force as the result of something called midichlorians in The Phantom Menace. I really dont want that level of detail. So, while perhaps I will always have questions over the nature of the island on Lost, Ill have to settle for the fact that it was simply a magical place where the normal laws of physics and time do not apply.
The above is what I have so far. Im still reflecting. Im certain there will be discussion for years to come.
Good series, though. Id have to put it in my top ten, if I had one for TV shows. No doubt, it would be fun to study in detail once the final series is released on Blu-ray.
FWIW the producers of the show are the ones who brought up this comparison in an interview some time back (the author's a little disingenuous to pass it off as his own idea).I like the Star Wars comparison. Sometimes it is better just to accept certain parts of a story as mythical or mysterious as opposed to breaking them down into minutiae.
Here's an interesting view from a blog I read occasionally:
LINK
I like the Star Wars comparison. Sometimes it is better just to accept certain parts of a story as mythical or mysterious as opposed to breaking them down into minutiae.
The problem I have with the way it ended is that the whole reason I got hooked into the show to begin with is I believed these guys were weaving some masterful complex super-riddle story arc that all tied together and would eventually all be told. We hung on every detail and looked for clues throughout the seasons because we believed the writers were telling us an epic tale, and that these things were all of some importance.
Not, as it turns out, just making random **** up as they go along. I gave the writers too much credit. If this were a book, the editors would have sent it back saying things like 'what's up with the statue. You just kinda don't ever explain it'..
The problem I have with the way it ended is that the whole reason I got hooked into the show to begin with is I believed these guys were weaving some masterful complex super-riddle story arc that all tied together and would eventually all be told. We hung on every detail and looked for clues throughout the seasons because we believed the writers were telling us an epic tale, and that these things were all of some importance.
Not, as it turns out, just making random **** up as they go along. I gave the writers too much credit. If this were a book, the editors would have sent it back saying things like 'what's up with the statue. You just kinda don't ever explain it'.
Don't mean to sound bitter - I loved lost, it's just that knowing now that the writing really wasn't thought out as well as we all wanted to believe it was kinda cheapens it for me.
Can you expand on this some more? I really don't understand this line of reasoning that, as you say, "cheapens" Lost.
Perhaps I don't see it because I find too many parallels between the world of Lost and the world we live in. There are so many struggles we face that we never fully understand. There are always things in life that we simply can't explain. Why would anyone expect a fictional world to be any different?
Why do you, and others, think that the writing is poorly thought out just because it doesn't read like a science text?
In my opinion, it was gutsy for the writers to end the show the way they did. They knew they would be leaving these mysteries open, but they chose to keep it more true to life. I think it is admirable and brilliant writing, not a cheap cop out.
Can you expand on this some more? I really don't understand this line of reasoning that, as you say, "cheapens" Lost.
Perhaps I don't see it because I find too many parallels between the world of Lost and the world we live in. There are so many struggles we face that we never fully understand. There are always things in life that we simply can't explain. Why would anyone expect a fictional world to be any different?
Why do you, and others, think that the writing is poorly thought out just because it doesn't read like a science text?
In my opinion, it was gutsy for the writers to end the show the way they did. They knew they would be leaving these mysteries open, but they chose to keep it more true to life. I think it is admirable and brilliant writing, not a cheap cop out.
Exactly 100% correct. That is my thinking as well. We don't get to know everything in life. I don;t know why people think it's a cop out to do the same thing with a TV show.
Exactly 100% correct. That is my thinking as well. We don't get to know everything in life. I don't know why people think it's a cop out to do the same thing with a TV show.
I agree.. Maybe WE are all in some sort of "Lost" internet purgatory thing.![]()
I think it maybe stems from the fact that many people think they need to have answers to everything. I prefer to leave things open-ended if I can't figure them out. Just like dying itself. I have no idea what will happen. I'll find out when I get there, but I would never in a million years say that I know what's going to happen.
3) What would have been so bad about letting flocke off the island ? At first I thought he would have left as smoky, but after the light went out it appeared that flocke turned mortal...At that point would it have mattered if he was off the island ?
Like Jack, you need to let go...This is the worst series finale I've ever seen, especially for a show as deserving as LOST. The ending was a TOTAL cop-out by the writers. It smacked of 'we've spun far too complicated a web, so let's reverse course here and make the show all about some character driven narrative'.
I've been an avid fan of the show since its inception, and remember Damon and Carlton specifically saying after someone questioned it being purgatory, that it was in no uncertain terms the premise of the show. So what do they do? They have the island story be real but the flash-sideways world be a purgatory of sorts. WEAK!
They also said at one time that the show's mysteries, or at least most of them, could be explained with science. I'm all for a little mythology woven in, but these last few episodes with a light in a cave in the middle of the jungle, without some sort of explanation was borderline cheesy and ridiculous.
It's as if they all realized during a writers session at the beginning of the season that they had convoluted the story so much it was no way to start explaining everything. I'm ok with that. Just explain a little... They chose to totally reverse course and start back-pedaling and every chance they got, they started trying to force-feed this notion of LOST being a character driven show, and that's what it's all about. BS! Fans became so addicted to the series and it's mythological elements that they actually created alternate reality games, and fact finding missions, etc. This ending to me was almost pandering in its quest to have an emotional impact, and have you more concerned with Sawyer and Juliet reuniting over a candy bar, than explaining what the hell they have created these last 6 years.
This, ladies and gentleman, is why you should never start asking questions you don't already know the answer to. They went down the rabbit hole, only to find out that all that's left is black smoke and some light...
Such an utter disappointment!