Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I suppose it comes from 'Pro' being the short form of 'Professional':

Noun
1 A person engaged or qualified in a profession: professionals such as lawyers and surveyors.
2 A person engaged in a specified activity, especially a sport, as a main paid occupation rather than as a pastime
3 a person competent or skilled in a particular activity

So I guess if you do something with a level of competence or skill, and/or get paid for that, you'd be a Pro. The problem is I think it's become a much abused term, generally applied to things that have more 'features' and cost more.
My question still stands, where is graphics involved in this definition?
 
had 3x4k. Love the setup
Testing if one is enough for me 1...(see screenshot)
guess what's the machine ?
just don't say...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2020-11-26 at 23.51.13.jpg
    Screenshot 2020-11-26 at 23.51.13.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 128
  • Like
Reactions: ruslan120
My question still stands, where is graphics involved in this definition?
Simple - it isn't. It could apply to anything, from basket weaving or Scottish Country Dancing to muffin baking, music production or graphics. If it's a primary activity, and/or you do it for reward, or at a high level of experience, expertise or competence, you could reasonably be called professional, or 'Pro', and likewise, products and services could be pitched to you by adding features or increased levels of utility, at a premium, with 'Pro' added to the description.
 
Simple - it isn't. It could apply to anything, from basket weaving or Scottish Country Dancing to muffin baking, music production or graphics. If it's a primary activity, and/or you do it for reward, or at a high level of experience, expertise or competence, you could reasonably be called professional, or 'Pro', and likewise, products and services could be pitched to you by adding features or increased levels of utility, at a premium, with 'Pro' added to the description.
Then fo back to the start of the thread and check why I've asked.
 
So I can connect one screen at 5K via HDMI and the other at 5K too via DisplayPort, all without external cables/hardware right?

The questions refers to the USB-C connection, not HDMI...
thanks
I am using my new M1 Pro with 2 externals via my HP USB-C Universal Dock G2. It is also charging and seeing the Gigabit ethernet perfectly. Monitors are an LG 34" 3440x1440 and 1 Dell 27" 4K. I am in the process of switching everything to use one 32" 4K and one 32" 2560x1440. I bought a cheap Acer 32" 2560x1440 but it is too fizzy for text work - looks great for Cad though. I will use it on the side for secondary stuff and use the 4K as primary. Honestly, I have had a couple ultra wide monitors for years, but they are just not great for productivity.
 
Alright, I got it to work on the G9. Here is what I did. I hooked up the MacBook Pro M1. Made sure in settings on the monitor, it was set to version 1.2 for Display Port. Then once the connection was made and BigSur picked up the display. I went to settings in the Mac, Display, pushed option key while clicking the scaled option and bam, I was able to set it to the correct dimensions. However, it looks tiny! But at least not blurry lol
 
  • Love
Reactions: ruslan120
Alright, I got it to work on the G9. Here is what I did. I hooked up the MacBook Pro M1. Made sure in settings on the monitor, it was set to version 1.2 for Display Port. Then once the connection was made and BigSur picked up the display. I went to settings in the Mac, Display, pushed option key while clicking the scaled option and bam, I was able to set it to the correct dimensions. However, it looks tiny! But at least not blurry lol
Wizard!! Mighty jealous* of the 8K. I had read about (the limited) macOS support and it scared me off from going for 8K (but I still want to lol)

Everything works with the two DP connections? Moving windows is seamless? Post a picture (please)?

* in a good way
 
Alright, I got it to work on the G9. Here is what I did. I hooked up the MacBook Pro M1. Made sure in settings on the monitor, it was set to version 1.2 for Display Port. Then once the connection was made and BigSur picked up the display. I went to settings in the Mac, Display, pushed option key while clicking the scaled option and bam, I was able to set it to the correct dimensions. However, it looks tiny! But at least not blurry lol
In the Mac Mini specs it says it supports one 6K via Thunderbolt/USB C and one 4K via HDMI. So, is isn’t possible to use both USB C at the same time to connect two screens at 5K?
 
Last edited:
I am using my new M1 Pro with 2 externals via my HP USB-C Universal Dock G2. It is also charging and seeing the Gigabit ethernet perfectly. Monitors are an LG 34" 3440x1440 and 1 Dell 27" 4K. I am in the process of switching everything to use one 32" 4K and one 32" 2560x1440. I bought a cheap Acer 32" 2560x1440 but it is too fizzy for text work - looks great for Cad though. I will use it on the side for secondary stuff and use the 4K as primary. Honestly, I have had a couple ultra wide monitors for years, but they are just not great for productivity.
Wasn’t you able to use both USB-C ports to connect the two screens?
 
In the Mac Mini specs it says it supports one 6K via Thunderbolt/USB C and one 4K via HDMI. So, is isn’t possible to use both USB C at the same time to connect two screens at 5K?
No (unfortunately), one *has* to go to either of the thunderbolt ports and the other *has* to go to HDMI :/
 
Wasn’t you able to use both USB-C ports to connect the two screens?
Just using one port to the Dock for everything. Both screens are via the Dock and Displayport. Not for everyone, but I do not game and am doing mostly Cad type apps.

After getting both new 32” screens up and running, 1 at 4K and the other at 2560x1440, I was very disappointed in the quality. Text was very fuzzy at all resolutions and the 4K was very poor at 2560x1440. I thought it was just cheap monitors I bought, but they are plenty sharp on my Surface via the same dock connection, so it seems like a scaling issue with the Mac of some issue with the Displayport driver. I know many say that Macs don’t scale from 4K to 2560 well, but I can say that the LG 4K runs fins at 2560 on my iMac Pro.
 
Just using one port to the Dock for everything. Both screens are via the Dock and Displayport. Not for everyone, but I do not game and am doing mostly Cad type apps.

After getting both new 32” screens up and running, 1 at 4K and the other at 2560x1440, I was very disappointed in the quality. Text was very fuzzy at all resolutions and the 4K was very poor at 2560x1440. I thought it was just cheap monitors I bought, but they are plenty sharp on my Surface via the same dock connection, so it seems like a scaling issue with the Mac of some issue with the Displayport driver. I know many say that Macs don’t scale from 4K to 2560 well, but I can say that the LG 4K runs fins at 2560 on my iMac Pro.
Sad to hear that. I’m very worried about it not being able to serve two 5K screens at the same time...
 
I just read this in a NUC forum:

“A 5K monitor will be 5120x2880. A 5120x1440 monitor is (just) an Ultra-Wide and falls into the 1440p class.”

I plan to connect two Philips P498 49” ultrawide at 5120x1440 to the Mac Mini. Based in the above then these screen wouldn’t be considered 5K resolution and I won’t have any problem with them?

thanks!

Edit: Mac Mini M1 official specs says it supports two screens, one at 6K and one and at 4K.

4K is 3840 x 2160 = more than 8M pixels

5120 x 1440 = 7.3M pixels

So I guess it should be able to run them, right?
 
Wow that's tragic. Sounds like something is going weirdly wrong there.

Quite frankly, I am not a fan of any Intel MacBook made from late-2015, they are all badly flawed in many ways. The Retina models from 2012 to mid-2015 remain the best Intel MacBooks ever made. The M1, of course, blows them all out of the water.

If I was you, I'd first go into an Apple store and ask them to take a look at it. I've found their service staff to be excellent, and will usually fix any problems for free if they don't require out of warranty parts.

If that fails to fix it, then I'd wipe the hard drive and install the OS from fresh (I'd install Mojave - it's the best one so far. Catalina is a dog, and Big Sur is too new to have ironed out all the problems). That might get your laptop kicking again. If you are going to do that, then I also recommending doing a temporary backup where you simply copy all the files you need to keep onto an external hard drive, as I've found Time Machine can sometimes mess you about. Good luck.

I've wiped it in the past to no avail. I honestly think it is a combo of a terrible processor and terrible integrated graphics. Even basic task like scrolling throw a google drive document causes noticeable lag.
 
I've wiped it in the past to no avail. I honestly think it is a combo of a terrible processor and terrible integrated graphics. Even basic task like scrolling throw a google drive document causes noticeable lag.
Wow, ok, did you try taking it into Apple to get them to look at it?
 
Yeah, even had 1 replaced (keyboard issue), and both ran the same. I haven't been impressed with the Intel Pro's since 2016. They are hot, slow, and buggy as hell.
Yeah, the post-Retina models have deliberately gimped cooling I'm pretty sure. I mean, it can't possibly be accidental, it's so damn obvious and stupid. The only reason I can think of is that they had decided to work on the M1 by then, and thus wanted to make the M1 look awesome in comparison (they probably didn't know back then quite how awesome the M1 was actually going to be). I know that sounds conspiracy theory rubbish, but watch the vids below and then tell me what other reason it could be. And tell me why my 2015 Retina MBP has great and effective cooling (I'm sitting here in my boxers typing with it on my lap). I wouldn't be surprised if some class action law suits come out of this eventually.

 
Yeah, the post-Retina models have deliberately gimped cooling I'm pretty sure. I mean, it can't possibly be accidental, it's so damn obvious and stupid. The only reason I can think of is that they had decided to work on the M1 by then, and thus wanted to make the M1 look awesome in comparison (they probably didn't know back then quite how awesome the M1 was actually going to be). I know that sounds conspiracy theory rubbish, but watch the vids below and then tell me what other reason it could be. And tell me why my 2015 Retina MBP has great and effective cooling (I'm sitting here in my boxers typing with it on my lap). I wouldn't be surprised if some class action law suits come out of this eventually.


I was watching YouTubeTV yesterday afternoon (steelers game), and I thought my laptop was going to explode between the heat and fan noise.
 
I was watching YouTubeTV yesterday afternoon (steelers game), and I thought my laptop was going to explode between the heat and fan noise.
Crikey, that sux!

If you're technical and handy at all, maybe you could trying fixing the heat problems as per those vids I posted!?
 
Just wrapped up some diagrams per viewer requests.

View attachment 1679582
View attachment 1679583

Apologies if scaling is off, on mobile.
Hey, do you know if I could use this dock:


Connecting it via USB-C to the Mac Mini it would give me the option to connect two 4K monitors via DisplayPort, and later I could connect one monitor via HDMI to the Mac Mini and finally have up to 3 screens with the Mac Mini.

Not sure if the Mini only gives more than two screens using Displaylink technology that is the one you are using with your dock...

Thanks!
 
Quick update. I was successfully able to share my two LG 27" 4k monitors to my MacBook Pro M1 by using the HP USB C/A Universal Dock G2 with the DisplayLink driver. It worked right away without any problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pow!
Hey,

I tried to connect both screens to the Caldigit via DisplayPort and it failed.

I tested another setups:

I bought a USB-C to HDMI adapter and connected one screen via HDMI and the other one with a HDMI cable using this adapter. The native HDMI screen works perfect at 3840 x 1080 but the other one is detected and works at that resolution too but the colors are fade, I can't make it working properly. The adapter is ok because it works well if I use it with a 2640 x 1080 34" more little screen. Why I can't get the right color for the 49" screen?

Finally, I was able to connect these three screens at the same time:
  • One 49" at 3840x1080 via HDMI
  • Another 49" at 3840x1080 via the Caldigit dual DisplayPort dock
  • The 34" 2560x1080 screen using Plugable 4K DisplayLink adapter via USB
I wouldn't need the Caldigit dock if I could get the right color via the Mac mini USB-C port. Could that be a software issue?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pow!
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.