Some folks were promising MacBook Pro at WWDC, but not Gurman:Considering how delayed manufacturing is, it’s as you mentioned just the wrong time to promote any new hardware. Last year he was busy promising MBP’s at the show, never happened.
Some folks were promising MacBook Pro at WWDC, but not Gurman:Considering how delayed manufacturing is, it’s as you mentioned just the wrong time to promote any new hardware. Last year he was busy promising MBP’s at the show, never happened.
No guarantees it will be based off M1.I don't follow closely Apple's hardware release logic but according to the rumours they will be releasing an M2 macBook Air but they have also teased the release of mac Pro that will probably not be announced yet but will be based on the M1 chip?
And every year people forget that Apple does announce hardware at WWDC when it suits them. They have often announced hardware if they think that it is of interest to developers or sometimes if it is just a convenient time to announce.Sorry, software only. Must we every year with this?
That list is incomplete too.This is a list of hardware that was released or announced at WWDC over the years.
- Power Mac G5 (2003)
- Aluminum Cinema displays (2004)
- Mac Pro (2006)
- iPhone 3G (2008)
- iPhone 3GS (2009)
- iPhone 4 (2010)
- 15-inch MacBook Pro (2012)
- Mac Pro (2013)
- HomePod (2017)
- iMac Pro (2017)
- Mac Pro (2019)
- Apple Silicon (2020)
![]()
History of hardware at WWDC: Every device launched at Apple’s developer conference in the last few years
A look back at some of the hardware announcements made by Apple at WWDC, its biggest software event of the year.indianexpress.com
I bet he is one of those guys that has a lot of stuff stuck on the ceiling too.So true.
Gurman throws every dart he can find at the wall in hopes one of them might hit the board
Never say never until we know. I like to see if they indeed have a quad SoC arrangement in the ProI think we’ll see the final version.
Zero chance Of m2 air.
Mac Pro and maybe pro display update. At most.
these rumors are getting dumber and dumber.
I can’t see $3k VR goggles selling well. The big question is, can Apple create something that will offer consumers a game-changing experience from what’s already on the market today? Recent history says not likely.
I was thinking dual M-UltraNever say never until we know. I like to see if they indeed have a quad SoC arrangement in the Pro![]()
MacBook Air also saw a refresh at WWDC 2017, in addition to the 12" MacBook and iMac. MacBook Pro and iPad Pro (if you really want to call that a “pro” product) were also refreshed.All pro devices though… (except HomePod)
I don’t discount the benefits of VR/AR as my previous posts have shown. What I question is if Apple can do much more than what’s already on the market today to justify $3k goggles. Also, I don’t know how they’ll do both AR/VR with a single pair of goggles. No one will wear them for AR outside the home, that’s for sure. Maybe they’ll get there in 10 years, but their recent history of product launches doesn’t inspire confidence that they’ll leapfrog the competition like they used to when Steve was around.What if the Mac Pro, MB All, Mac mini, M2-M3-M4 Macs are all "IN' there? In other words, if you have super high resolution screens to basically fool eyes into seeing whatever you want to show them and great sound to fool ears into hearing whatever you want them to hear, what if you leapfrog world supply chain issues (and costs) and deliver everything Apple can dream in in VR/AR in the googles?
Seem far-fetched? See this simulated here and there in this video...
That kind of (seemingly very desirable functionality) is what I keep thinking must be in $3K goggles/glasses.
Now you spend $3K and you gain access to your own Mac Pro that is anywhere you and your goggles/glasses go... as is any size screen... any kind of sound system... big screen TV... front-row tickets to any event... etc.
In short: if we think beyond Oculus gaming, there's a whole lot of value that could be in there that could make $3K seem like a bargain. And if Apple can cut all manufacturers out of getting their cuts of making tangible products, virtual Apple "stuff" becomes a very profitable new business.
Ok, I remember some discussing the possible production starting up for MBP in April/May, but not seeing him.Some folks were promising MacBook Pro at WWDC, but not Gurman:
You can literally easily search and find out that this is just not true.Yep. In decades of WWDC, Apple have never announced new consumer Mac hardware at a WWDC. Mac Pros and Pro Displays and such, yes. But never a consumer Mac. Why would this year be any different?
Add to the list the mid-2009 13" MBP, introduced at WWDC in Jun-09 and which I am hoping to replace very, very soon.False.
Apple left MacWorld in 09.
Since then they announced the iPhone 4 at WWDC 2010, the IvyBridge MacBook Air and Macbook pros at WWDC 2012, the Haswell MacBook Air and trashcan MacPro at wwdc 2013, a spec bumped MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, iPad Pro + the iMac Pro and HomePod At WWDC2017, The 2019 Mac Pro and Pro Display XDR at WWDC 2019, and The Apple Silicon transition and developer transition kit at WWDC 2020.
Explain the 2012 MacBook Air, the 2013 MacBook Air, and the 2017 MacBook Air, all introduced at WWDC.
Also explained the laptop Apple filed in the Eurasian economic database back in February. Apple doesn’t file things in there unless their release is within a quarter or two, certainly not 9 months later as you’re suggesting
I don't think that's as crazy as some might
I wouldn't be surprised, at all, if they keep the Intel MacPro going a lot longer than some others might expect.
I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it going alongside a newer AS MacPro also -- just to have an Intel compatibility option for those who need it (MP buyers are a likely candidate there)