Andrew has a lot of dead air time in his livestreams. I like the "compact" reviews he does where that stuff is cut out. He does spend time playing games via crossover though so that is nice.Andrew Tsai is reviewing on YouTube tomorrow morning (10/22), the m5 playing different games.
That is nearly a 30% uplift. Wonder if they will switch on RT/PT and see if the uplift carries.CP2077 benchmark
1200p Ultra - No Upscaling
MBP M5: 27FPS
MBP M4: 21FPS
www.notebookcheck.com
Unfortunately… not in the current version of CP2077.That is nearly a 30% uplift. Wonder if they will switch on RT/PT and see if the uplift carries.
Thanks. That result seems higher than I would have expected. I wonder what setting he tested at?
Dang they didn't update to the latest native CP2077 version (I was hoping but I knew a lot of their prior testing on older machines was using v2.2) nor use CB R24 for the energy test. Sigh. Oh well. Maybe they'll update it as time goes on.Notebookcheck shows a 44% uplift for CP2077 (no upscaling, or rt). 1080p Ultra.
View attachment 2570984![]()
Test Apple MacBook Pro M5 (2025) - Der schnellste Single-Core-Prozessor der Welt
Notebookcheck testet das Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5 mit dem neuen M5-SoC, 32 GB RAM und Nanotexturglas-Mini-LED.www.notebookcheck.com
Could be the M4 Air was struggling with thermals?Thanks. That result seems higher than I would have expected. I wonder what setting he tested at?
Wait.. are they testing it through Crossover or something?Dang they didn't update to the latest native CP2077 version (I was hoping but I knew a lot of their prior testing on older machines was using v2.2) nor use CB R24 for the energy test. Sigh. Oh well. Maybe they'll update it as time goes on.
However, 2.2 is good as a non-native test!
Definitely possible although the CP2077 benchmark is pretty short so I don’t know.Could be the M4 Air was struggling with thermals?
Lol. He called Blender, a rt benchmark, “no rt”. I assume he meant cpu and no hardware rt but still.His Blender result which he said was done with "no RT" was weird too - in the other direction. So not sure.
I think macOS only got 2.3, so any older version would be via Crossover. Unless the graph is just mislabeled.Wait.. are they testing it through Crossover or something?
Dang they didn't update to the latest native CP2077 version (I was hoping but I knew a lot of their prior testing on older machines was using v2.2) nor use CB R24 for the energy test. Sigh. Oh well. Maybe they'll update it as time goes on.
However, 2.2 is good as a non-native test!
Wait.. are they testing it through Crossover or something?
I think macOS only got 2.3, so any older version would be via Crossover. Unless the graph is just mislabeled.
Something I find particularly notable is that the m5 machine achieves around 50% of the RTX 5050 laptop from their database at x5.5 lower total system power consumption. That sounds pretty insane. What’s more, the power consumption is 10 watts lower than the M4, despite a massive performance boost.
Definitely possible although the CP2077 benchmark is pretty short so I don’t know.
Lol. He called Blender, a rt benchmark, “no rt”. I assume he meant cpu and no hardware rt but still.
Thanks for picking this up, I hadn’t noticed. That’s disappointing. I get the reasons, but still.Yeah it's crossover. They talked about Cyberpunk being native now in translated text, but the version they are using, 2.2, with all the historical data they can compare against previous models isn't native. Maybe they did do native for the M5, but then it isn't comparable, so ...
Steel Nomad seems to be the outlier afaik. I wonder if SN is more simple than actual games and thus utilization is very high on pretty much all gpus? Given the lack of core count increase or frequency increase it’s not surprising. Just a guess.Interestingly NBC's Steel Nomad and SNL tests showed smaller gains than I was expecting. The M5 Max definitely won't be hitting the 5090 mobile in that test if that holds up.