Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They've all been Jonathan Ive designs since the first iMac in 1998. His design input personifies what Steve's philosophy for Apple is all about, and has been since he returned.

And if you want to crack a current iMac, all you have to do is Google it. It's a fairly simple thing to upgrade the HDD.

But Apple have recently radically revised their pricing policy by reducing the difference between the standard 320GB and 500GB option to just $50, 750GB to $150 and 1TB to $300 on the 2.8GHz 24" model, therefore reducing our need to perform DIY jobs for at least the life of the first HDD.

It's the same story with the memory. If you compared Apple's RAM prices with those of Orca and Crucial only a month ago, Apple looked like a robber baron. Now, when you consider questions of possible 3rd party issues, it's worth telling Apple to fit the max 4GB when ordering.

But these are all marketing decisions. They help to push up the unit spend and keep more business in-house. That money was already being spent, often before the Mac shipped, but with Crucial etc. Now Apple is getting it. And as Apple's market share increases, you can bet that's hurting some people.

I've seen them too. From the marvel that was the PowerMac G3 to computer without a niche that was the Cube to the all in one for every one doesn't want one called the ALU iMac. They're gone from good looking machines that deliver to machines where design trumps usability.

As for the instructions for replacing the hard drive, I've seen them. It involves taking the machine completely apart. Since that would void the 3-year apple care I got to protect against the tendency for Ive systems to overheat, it isn't worth he effort. Its a amazing system as a family machine or as a business/education terminal, but it isn't for everyone as Jobs, Ive, and some people around here may believe.
 
Wow!

When you failed psychology and started seeing the world in such narrow terms, did someone in a white coat hand you a small piece of paper that read: 'Prescription'? You should go find it. How can you make such ludicrously simplistic statements? :rolleyes:

I own a business that's giving EVERYONE a new iMac. And guess what? there's a suitable iMac for everyone, from secretary and receptionist to techie, sales and CEO. How democratic is that? And when we do press stuff, we don't hire some hotel function suite, we use the office - because it looks so good!:apple:

And here's another thing, all my employees friends want to work for us now! But of course, they're all mindless... what was the term?... oh yeah - mindless fools, just like us. But hey, do we make money and party? You bet.

Ouch! And I aced psych btw:)

I did oversimplify, but only to emphasize one point. I do not think that anyone or everyone that buys an iMac is a mindless fool or for that matter that everyone who buys a mac pro is a techno geek movie producer.

My point was that is seems that those are Apple's views of its customers.
Apple used to make relatively affordable upgradeable machines, but doesn't anymore.

Your particular case is, for lack of a better beaten to death metaphor, like comparing apples to oranges.
In the business world, computers are rarely upgraded with hardware, and usually use a narrow range of software, for which the hardware was originally speced to run. In my business, I have 4 dells which I will never foreseeably upgrade, and they will run as shipped until they die. I could have bought iMacs or Minis without concern.

For the home or home business user, with one or 2 machines, an iMac can be a problem. My G4 purchased in 2002 is still running my wife's design apps, imovie, iTunes for my ipod, etc.
If I had purchased an iMac at the time,
1) I would have been stuck with USB 1.1 which would have made my digital life miserable (slow transfer for digital cameras, memory card, ipod, etc.)
2) I would be stuck with a woefully inadequate HD
3) I would have had an ugly blue external ZIP drive like the one for my 8500

My G4 Quicksilver was and is a beautiful machine, but I think I really need an upgrade if I want to run 2008 versions of my applications.

What % of imacs purchased in 2002 are still used vs. % of G4 towers? I don't know, but its an interesting question.

In a business, there is an acceptable life and a defined purpose for computers. In a home environment that is necessarily true. As a home/ home business user, I want to be able to adapt my machine to changing technology
and needs. Who thought I would have tons of music, videos and digital pics to store when I bought my machine? But because it is upgradeable, it is still running. (Although that could be why Steve doesn't like it)
 
Ouch! And I aced psych btw:)

I did a second major in Psych with a 3.8 GPA - don't let the amateurs get you down ;) !

In the early 20th century, we would have said that they had concerns about the size of certain body parts that were normally hidden in their pants.

Now, we might wonder if their uncertainty about their own sexual orientation was being expressed in seemingly random outlets.

Neither, of course, is true. It's simply an inability to accept that both Windows and OSX are reasonable choices depending on your requirements, and there's no need to denigrate or insult people who've chosen differently.

Maybe we need the California Supreme Court to rule that both Apple and Windows users must be given full and equal rights under the law.... ;)
 
I recently got a Dell desktop with a 2.4ghz quad core intel processor, 250gb hard drive, 2gb ram, 256mb Nvidia 8600gts, and wireless card with a 24" LCD monitor.

For $750.

I've always bought apple computers in the past, but with the economy the way it is, I couldn't afford Apple's premium pricing. Even a base mini would have cost more once the keyboard, mouse, and monitor were figured in. Plus this Dell computer can be upgraded easily with inexpensive parts!

For the hundreds of dollars I saved, I can put up with windows vista until I can someday afford a nice mac again. I'm glad there are companies like Dell that will sell me high end hardware for almost no profit. It makes good business sense for Apple to focus on the high end customers, but it is also hard to imagine that market growing much in the next year or two.

Apples are nice computers for the upscale market, but that is exactly the reason I'm not buying one! Because I can't afford to be upscale right now!
 
The G3 iMac that was around when you bought your G4 was a toy - a home tool really, even though some small businesses bought into the idea. But today's iMac is a very different machine altogether, and its place in the market is spread over a wider range that offers many different configuration options and two sizes.

Congratulations on the psych result btw. I like to bark nasty sometimes to be controversial, but no real insult is intended. Thank you for being decent and not flaming me;)


Ouch! And I aced psych btw:)

I did oversimplify, but only to emphasize one point. I do not think that anyone or everyone that buys an iMac is a mindless fool or for that matter that everyone who buys a mac pro is a techno geek movie producer.

My point was that is seems that those are Apple's views of its customers.
Apple used to make relatively affordable upgradeable machines, but doesn't anymore.

Your particular case is, for lack of a better beaten to death metaphor, like comparing apples to oranges.
In the business world, computers are rarely upgraded with hardware, and usually use a narrow range of software, for which the hardware was originally speced to run. In my business, I have 4 dells which I will never foreseeably upgrade, and they will run as shipped until they die. I could have bought iMacs or Minis without concern.

For the home or home business user, with one or 2 machines, an iMac can be a problem. My G4 purchased in 2002 is still running my wife's design apps, imovie, iTunes for my ipod, etc.
If I had purchased an iMac at the time,
1) I would have been stuck with USB 1.1 which would have made my digital life miserable (slow transfer for digital cameras, memory card, ipod, etc.)
2) I would be stuck with a woefully inadequate HD
3) I would have had an ugly blue external ZIP drive like the one for my 8500

My G4 Quicksilver was and is a beautiful machine, but I think I really need an upgrade if I want to run 2008 versions of my applications.

What % of imacs purchased in 2002 are still used vs. % of G4 towers? I don't know, but its an interesting question.

In a business, there is an acceptable life and a defined purpose for computers. In a home environment that is necessarily true. As a home/ home business user, I want to be able to adapt my machine to changing technology
and needs. Who thought I would have tons of music, videos and digital pics to store when I bought my machine? But because it is upgradeable, it is still running. (Although that could be why Steve doesn't like it)
 
The old saw about building a PC is incredibly tiresome. Try building a laptop from scratch.

No, what is tiresome is the same old Mac Fanboys spouting the same old tired routines.

And your incredibly naive to think the hardware is the same. Yes, the mobo and cpu might be the same. But the case, screen, and testing to make sure it all works together are not. But whatever.

Screen = Purchase a monitor of your CHOICE in the PC World, not take what Apple gives you and oh gee, what do I do if the monitor breaks after the warranty is up and the computer is still working.... (plug in another monitor and watch the giant dead screen as a dongle, I suppose). Cases are $20-100 items in the PC world. You can get any case you want. And you don't have to build them yourself. Dell will build one for you. Any number of small computer shops (try going to a computer show once) will gladly build them for you with the case and hardware items of your choice (I actually DID put mine together; it was very simple to do, but for less than $50, most places will do it for you; some don't even charge to do it. The last PC I bought locally charged the same either way so I let them assemble it).

Testing? Do you think Dells are tested less than Apples? What about the yellow-screen LED problems on the laptops? What about the keyboards that won't type properly or that were missing the first letter of the first word typed (that bug took over 2 years to get a 'fix'). Paleeze. Apple's products are hardly bug or problem-free.

I could also build my own house and save a pile of money. Who the hell cares.

You're comparing connecting up a motherboard and plugging in a few cards to building a house??? And you expect me to take your comments as anything more than ludicrous nonsense? You're talking to someone that owns a PC and a Mac and AppleTV and an iPod Touch and knows how to run and administrate Linux (which I also have installed on the PC) and has two degrees in electronic engineering. You're not going get any BS past me.

Guess what, my time is money. While I can easily build a PC and have done so in the past when I had more time, I could care less about building one today.

So don't. Select what you want and let Dell or any other number of hardware vendors both on the Net and/or locally do it for you. What's the big deal? If you don't want to do that much work (i.e. pick out what YOU *want* in a computer), you can still go to somewhere like Best Buy and pick a price range and/or marquee that suits you and have a fully functional system in your hands as you walk out the door. You can also buy a Mac at Best Buy these days. What's the difference other than with the PC you tend to actually have a CHOICE what hardware you get whereas with Apple's offerings you're more or less stuck with what Steve wants to sell you at a given price point and too bad if the graphics suck on that model. Go buy the $2400+ Mac Pro or the $2200 24" iMac if you want to play games. The problem is that they're competing with $700-1200 systems in the PC world (i.e. you're pay 2x as much to play the SAME game using the SAME graphics card, etc.). And YET, the fanboys will still CLAIM that the current Macs are comparable to the same PCs at the same price range. The problem is that a Mac Pro is touted by Apple as their best game machine, yet it's NOT the kind of hardware a normal PC user would consider gaming hardware. It's complete and total OVERKILL and yet there is *NO* offering from Apple that CAN game that is NOT overkill. You either pay $2200 for a 'custom' 24" iMac or you pay $2400+ for a MacPro. Actually, that MacPro with the same gaming card will be a couple hundred more so more like $2600.

You might save a couple of hundred dollars, AT BEST, on component costs.

I'll buy that argument IF you'll explain then why the same components in a $800 PC are only found in a $2600 MacPro. That's a bit more than a "couple hundred dollars".

For me, those savings would be gone in about an hour and a half in time.

For me, I'd have the computer assembled in less than an hour. It's not rocket science. It's snap'n'screw.

Factor in build time (about 2 hours), shopping time (1-2 hours at least on the internet, longer going to a store). And hope that every piece works together the first time, with no driver issues, or else your looking at an even longer build time.

So you're saying you don't have to "shop" for a Mac? You just order the first one you happen to click on at the Apple store online or take the first one they hand you at a physical Apple store or Best Buy????

Driver issues, etc. are venturing into software. I maintain you can run OSX on cloneware PC. See Psycorp. They'll sell you a 2 choice pre-assembled OSX option that can also run Windows and Linux for under $1000 that gaming-wise will run circles around everything but the $2000+ Apple models.

99% of people that have a computer did NOT build it themselves. So pointing out that you could build one for less is worthless.

You're making an awful lot out of one little comment that I built MY PC last November. Nowhere did I say you had to build your own. The computer show I went to last year in Allentown PA next to the pinball show I was attending had numerous vendors that begging me to let them build any kind of machine I could want. You CAN still get what you want and NOT have to build it yourself you know. Or maybe you don't know that?

As for upgrading a Mac being cyclical thinking, you are misusing the term. However, I understand what you are saying. But you are wrong.

For one thing, because a Mac Pro or any other tower Mac typically is a fairly powerful system when bought, it has less need for upgrades to stay current.
A typical PC user that upgrades is cash poor and upgrading over time, typically because the PC is too slow at some task. Well guess what, as you

So I'm wrong because YOU think so? I used my last PC for 7 years, upgrading its processor once and its graphics card twice. I had to reinstall Windows98 *ONE* time in 7 years (and not when I upgraded the CPU or graphics cards). I had exactly ZERO viruses during that time too (and no I didn't leave a virus checker running 24/7 and yes it was on the Internet). You see HOW and WHOM uses a PC also factors into the experience. Any moron can get viruses and screw their system up. If you have a little bit of computer knowledge that doesn't have to happen.

The real point here is that the major applications that need ever faster speeds and graphics cards are GAMES. Your argument boils down to the fact that the Mac has very few games of its own that you don't NEED a new computer every few years. Yet if you don't play games on a PC, you don't NEED one every couple of years either (barring video work, etc. in which case you'd probably want a new Mac every couple of years too and invalidates your entire argument).

The CURRENT situation with Macs is that they use the SAME HARDWARE (save EFI versus BIOS) as generic PCs out there. Thus, your argument completely falls flat on its face no matter HOW you look at it. In fact, the Mac that isn't a MacPro isn't upgradeable in terms of graphics cards, etc., so it will need replaced *MORE* often than a PC for the same use.

Honestly, you don't seem to know what you're talking about when it comes to computer hardware (typical of fanboy types in my experience) and so I guess I shouldn't be surprised by your total lack of actual argument points.

I've owned 4 tower Macs, all bought new. The ONLY things I worked on on any of them were RAM, and hard drives. One, I added a new video card and one I added a $20 USB 2.0 card. And when they got too slow, I just bought a new computer. I could have replaced the CPU. Why bother.

Oh, I don't know. I bought a cheap used PowerMac G4 for a song and upgraded its CPU to 1.8GHz, added a Sata card and installed dual 500GB Sata drives, replaced the CDR with a modern DVD-R and added a USB 2.0 card, set up 1.5GB of ram and updated the Operating system, all for less than the cheapest iMac and while it doesn't contain the CPU power of said iMac (and was far less than half what a MacPro costs), it DOES achieve its desired function as a media center server without the freaking MESS of an iMac + *external* typically slower, more expensive hard drives. In fact, my hard drive speed tests faster than a default MacPro. It's connected via Gigabit to my router which then streams its contents all over my house to multiple AppleTV and Airport Express units. Why upgrade? I don't NEED a MacPro at $2400+ to do what I need this to do. I don't want a desk full of external components lying around, etc. Guess what? Not everyone's needs match YOUR needs.


Again, what you seem to be missing is that, in reality, NO ONE really is interested in doing any hardware work more complicated than installing RAM.

"NO ONE", eh? ROTFLMAO. I wonder why Best Buy sells components to upgrade computers at a retail store where space is a premium if NO ONE is really interested in doing anything with their computer. I find it funny you think they're willing to install ram, yet think installing something like a video card is "more complicated" when it's pretty much the same thing. Plug it in and maybe latch or turn a screw. Big deal. If they dont' want to install anything (computers are scary!), fine. But don't pretend they're scared YET are willing to install ram dimms.

As for the hardcore, who build gaming rigs, constantly upgrading, they are a dying breed, just like PC gaming. And a Mac user is NOT interested in finding what video card will actually work with Crysis and installing it. They will just have a 360 or PS3.

Some games will never work right on a console platform. And please don't speak for ALL Mac users ever again as it makes you look bad (some Mac users do use BootCamp for little more than gaming). Thanks so much.
 
That's an interestingly relaxed outlook. I'm so glad you can afford the downtime that is such an integral part of the Windows experience.

My guys costed all the downtime, all the tech support and all the parts and repairs on the PCs and compared them with the Macs. I don't have the numbers to hand now, but it wasn't a small difference. In fact it was HUGE.

Just taking on one new member of staff who is fully trained on a PC and expecting them to get on with it turned into a hit and miss issue. So we did an experiment.

We asked who would be happy to use all Macs. Those who jumped at the idea kept their PCs. Those who were resistant, got Macs! And guess what? We had a 100% fully trained Mac team in 14 days! It was that easy.

I figured we already had a core of Mac receptive people we could rely on to take the Macs if the PC people hated them. So I gave the PC guys time to learn the new system. 100% - 14 days. I'll swap 14 days of learning curve and some initial doubt for 52 weeks of security, stability and peace of mind any day.

I'll tell you what's reasonable: When a computer company or a software company puts me, the user, first, develops a solution that I can rely on and doesn't lie to me. That stupid pair of fools at Redmond deserve to be **** on from a great height by their customers. I wouldn't trust them to clean my rest rooms.


I did a second major in Psych with a 3.8 GPA - don't let the amateurs get you down ;) !

In the early 20th century, we would have said that they had concerns about the size of certain body parts that were normally hidden in their pants.

Now, we might wonder if their uncertainty about their own sexual orientation was being expressed in seemingly random outlets.

Neither, of course, is true. It's simply an inability to accept that both Windows and OSX are reasonable choices depending on your requirements, and there's no need to denigrate or insult people who've chosen differently.

Maybe we need the California Supreme Court to rule that both Apple and Windows users must be given full and equal rights under the law.... ;)
 
FYI, I happen to have a garage full of used Dell, HP, and Gateway boxes, all worthless bulky crap, cheap plastic dvd trays that snap easily, and flat screen monitors which suck in terms of clarity, depth, and color saturation. Windows cost me too much in terms of time re-starting and tweaking. If you prefer working with this utter crap, well then this is your choice.

FYI, I wanted to buy a Mac last year (looking up old posts of mine will prove it), but Apple REFUSED to offer anything with a DECENT (read usable for playing SOME current 3D games now and then, even if only through BootCamp) and when over 8 months went by and NOTHING came out (the MacPro finally offered a good card in early 2008 and now the $2200 iMac 24" in the past month or so), Apple lost a sale. I decided to buy a PC for running legacy software and for gaming (instead of using Boot Camp and Fusion) and to upgrade my PowerMac instead to run the Mac apps I use and to run my whole house audio system instead of buying a new Mac to do it on the side. Plus this way the two don't compete for resources). I plan to buy a Mac laptop later this year to use as a portable recording studio with my guitar and Roland synth sound rig (running Logic Pro).

But ultimately, WHAT I buy depends on my needs. I don't feel the need to act like a child and insult other platforms (that have their uses) just because I need to feel special. I make pinball games on the PC for a company that is making game room/bar/arcade type machines. It doesn't run the MacOS. And XP isn't nearly as bad as you make it sound. I do like MacOSX better, but unlike you, I can recognize parts for what they are. And there's NOTHING special about current Apple gear in terms of hardware. As for the iMac, I liked the previous "look" better, but looks have little to do with it. The last generation of Mac laptops had yellow-screen issues on the new LED models and until recently an unforgiveable keyboard issue (who wants the first letter of their sentence to not appear?). So don't tell me Apple's hardware is and has always been GOLD because it's just not true.
 
Perhaps. It's nice to see whatever the reason.

Agreed.

My mum knows nothing about computers and has had no issues with XP.

Ever.

What programs does she run regularly?

I'm sorry but that's not true. QDOS led to IBMDOS which led to IBMDOS and Windows Me was the last to use it. XP and Vista come from the NT family which only run a DOS emulator and are not based upon it. This has been the case since XP came out in 2001.

Regardless of running a DOS Emulator, Windows XP has more than twice the millions of lines of code it did when it was Win95. Vista has twice the millions of lines of code of XP. Windows has become far too big for MS to handle - Vista is now over 60 million lines of code, and all of them are maintained by MS. (no open source) Another problem involves backwards compatibility; this is difficult because the API's were poorly thought out to begin with, so programmers worked around them on the underlying implementation. The lack of a hardware platform - support for multiple platforms makes MS's task tons more difficult than Apple's.

Apple avoids these issues by choosing not to support third party platforms, it works on their computers, and that's it. Windows cannot ship PC's for anti-trust reasons, but could reduce its backward compatibility issues by using the second core of x86's to run a virtual PC containing a copy of whatever old OS was needed to run some old software, as Classic or Rosetta did for OS X. They could also offload some features by adopting open source solutions. Much of OS X is open sourced, which means Apple has a much larger pool of developers than simply those they employ. All in all, much less room for problems, incompatibility issues, etc. If a pesky app were to misbehave in OS X, force quitting releases that app and allows you to continue working and actually save your work, without bringing the entire system down. ("blue screan of death")

2010 actually.

I do recall Longhorn's release date was originally slated for 2003. I would say 2012 would be a safer bet.

This is a gross exaggeration. A more relevant analogy would be to wear a jacket in case it might rain.

Certainly not according to Vista's default security: "Need your permissions to continue-" prompts.

MS Access, Outlook, Visio, Picasa and most recent games.

Yes, MS converted Outlook to Entourage, and decided not to port Access, Visio, or Picasa to OS X. Oh well, they do seem to have enough on their hands with Office 2008, Windows 7, Zune 3, and Advertising, Advertising, Advertising: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTkA9L2J2gY
 
Is it? A BMW uses steel alloy just as a Ford Escort does, and uses rubber for the tires as well. It even uses glass for the windshield and plasic for the instrument panel. What you pay for when you purchase a BMW is design, style, and quality. The same is true of an iMac 24". (I've yet to see a PC built with the same solid and high quality aluminum structure and stellar design of an iMac)

BMWs and Ford Escorts have vastly different performance parts (whereas both Windows PCs and Macs generally use the same processors, GPUs, and RAM), that's a terrible analogy.

BMWs also have a not-insignificant amount of markup just from the name.

Personally, I think this entire debate is just stupid. Windows PCs and Macs have advantages and disadvantages. Pick your poison..
 
FYI, I wanted to buy a Mac last year (looking up old posts of mine will prove it), but Apple REFUSED to offer anything with a DECENT (read usable for playing SOME current 3D games now and then, even if only through BootCamp) and when over 8 months went by and NOTHING came out (the MacPro finally offered a good card in early 2008 and now the $2200 iMac 24" in the past month or so), Apple lost a sale.
Too little, too late. They still haven't figured out gaming and open GL
I plan to buy a Mac laptop later this year to use as a portable recording studio with my guitar and Roland synth sound rig (running Logic Pro).
Logic Pro 8.0.2 is awesome, revamped in a most brilliant layout.

But ultimately, WHAT I buy depends on my needs.
Agreed. Apple chooses not to offer solutions for those who would like to build their own workstation at consumer level prices. They figure that pros will splurge for workstations, consumers will go for the all-in-one or limited Mini, and there's nothing available in-between. It is a pity. Perhaps, once the sales begin to taper, and after the 3G iPhone is deployed, they might introduce a mini-tower for those who prefer to build to their needs. Unfortunately, who knows when and if this will ever happen.

The last generation of Mac laptops had yellow-screen issues on the new LED models and until recently an unforgiveable keyboard issue (who wants the first letter of their sentence to not appear?). So don't tell me Apple's hardware is and has always been GOLD because it's just not true.
I never claimed Apple hardware to be gold. I will say that when and if there is a problem, they're pretty good at swapping things out and/or fixing them. I did not have that experience with either Dell, Gateway, or HP's customer service in the past. Windows XP has issues which are stated in the previous post. For the most part, Apple's hardware integrity is quite decent, durable, and generally high quality. It's good to see other companies begin to follow suit.
 
BMWs and Ford Escorts have vastly different performance parts (whereas both Windows PCs and Macs generally use the same processors, GPUs, and RAM), that's a terrible analogy.

BMWs also have a not-insignificant amount of markup just from the name.

Personally, I think this entire debate is just stupid. Windows PCs and Macs have advantages and disadvantages. Pick your poison..

Are you saying the only thing that separates the Windows PC and Mac are the processors, GPUs, and RAM? How about the actual bodies (grades of plastic, metals, casing structure, plugs and connectors, and overall integrity?) I would think the entire package, apps running on OSX, on an elegant machine designed to run them fluently, without crashing, would define a user experience more than merely the processors, GPUs and RAM would. People also purchase the marked up BMW for its design, higher grade materials, reliability, responsiveness, and reputation.
 
Are you saying the only thing that separates the Windows PC and Mac are the processors, GPUs, and RAM? How about the actual bodies (grades of plastic, metals, casing structure, plugs and connectors, and overall integrity?) I would think the entire package, apps running on OSX, on an elegant machine designed to run them fluently, without crashing, would define a user experience more than merely the processors, GPUs and RAM would. People also purchase the marked up BMW for its design, higher grade materials, reliability, responsiveness, and reputation.

Totally agree...Apple=BMW, Dell=Hyuandi...
 
Some quotes on Apple going with Form over Function lately

Being sustainable is sometimes too easily interpreted as a Cradle to Cradle decision in terms of materials when actually the core idea that should be upheld by companies like Apple should be about making things better and less often. Making things that will be able to evolve, be upgraded, be adaptable, hackable and more fun to use for longer so that as a customer I don’t think that I’m buying version 3.4 of something that will only be as good as it’s last press release. I want to buy “the” quintessential Apple product and cherish it for years, like people would cherish a vintage car.

Is it unreasonable to expect the designers of one of the best gadgets in the last few years to think about how they are serviced, refurbished and disposed of?, I think not.

We simply can’t go on forever buying stuff and dumping the old, unwanted broken stuff without regard. The designers have their part to play in this, as do the companies that sell us stuff.

We should not criticise Apple for anything other than a lack of hackability. Components need to be replaceable to extend the life of the devices we use. Throwaway electronics are by definition not sustainable.

(Those are not my words: mainly from redmonks, greenmonks)
 
Ha Ha Ha!

"Consumers don't care about features," Stephen asserted. "People see a value proposition in an offering that gives them a great experience."

Killing me! This has to be an Onion article. Or a Microsoft PR.
 
Are you saying the only thing that separates the Windows PC and Mac are the processors, GPUs, and RAM? How about the actual bodies (grades of plastic, metals, casing structure, plugs and connectors, and overall integrity?) I would think the entire package, apps running on OSX, on an elegant machine designed to run them fluently, without crashing, would define a user experience more than merely the processors, GPUs and RAM would. People also purchase the marked up BMW for its design, higher grade materials, reliability, responsiveness, and reputation.

The CPUs, GPUs, memory, display, and drives are the same. A ROM chip is different. What Apple does from there is put a laptop in back of a cheap 20" or decent 24" screen and calls it a desktop. Elegent? Yes. Extremely useful to medium to high end desktop (not workstation) users? Not so much. The Operating System IS the difference. If it wasn't there there is no way I would have spent $1700 on a computer that can't do out of the box what I ask of it.
 
The CPUs, GPUs, memory, display, and drives are the same. A ROM chip is different. What Apple does from there is put a laptop in back of a cheap 20" or decent 24" screen and calls it a desktop. Elegent? Yes. Extremely useful to medium to high end desktop (not workstation) users? Not so much. The Operating System IS the difference. If it wasn't there there is no way I would have spent $1700 on a computer that can't do out of the box what I ask of it.

If this is the case, at least they have the decency not to charge the full price of a Pro laptop.
 
The G3 iMac that was around when you bought your G4 was a toy - a home tool really, even though some small businesses bought into the idea. But today's iMac is a very different machine altogether, and its place in the market is spread over a wider range that offers many different configuration options and two sizes.

Actually, the iMac at the time was the Luxo G4

Congratulations on the psych result btw. I like to bark nasty sometimes to be controversial, but no real insult is intended. Thank you for being decent and not flaming me;)

No flames except for politics and religion, which is why I haven't discussed them on message boards in years.;)
 
Oh, I don't know. I bought a cheap used PowerMac G4 for a song and upgraded its CPU to 1.8GHz, added a Sata card and installed dual 500GB Sata drives, replaced the CDR with a modern DVD-R and added a USB 2.0 card, set up 1.5GB of ram and updated the Operating system, all for less than the cheapest iMac and while it doesn't contain the CPU power of said iMac (and was far less than half what a MacPro costs), it DOES achieve its desired function as a media center server without the freaking MESS of an iMac + *external* typically slower, more expensive hard drives. In fact, my hard drive speed tests faster than a default MacPro. It's connected via Gigabit to my router which then streams its contents all over my house to multiple AppleTV and Airport Express units. Why upgrade? I don't NEED a MacPro at $2400+ to do what I need this to do. I don't want a desk full of external components lying around, etc. Guess what? Not everyone's needs match YOUR needs.

Why did you choose to spend $300 to upgrade the processor? What was the original speed? For a media server is processor speed that important?

At what point are the returns too low?
ie. I could buy a 1Ghz G4 upgrade card for my 8500 for $99, but that would be rediculous (slow ethernet, slow mobo, etc.) I could buy a used G4 for little more than that.

For what you spent to put a 1.8 G4 together, you probably could have gotten a used G5 that was more powerful.

You spent ~$750 I'm guessing for a machine that, although adequate for your current needs, has probably hit the wall. (At what point will new software be incompatible with PPC chips?)

I guess the real point here is that apple doesn't really offer anything right now to meet your needs. (And you would have bought an apple product if there was one.)

On a slightly different topic -is it possible to use a NAS as a media server?
It seems they would cost less to run.
 
What programs does she run regularly?

Firefox, Word, Picasa and gmail.

Regardless of running a DOS Emulator, Windows XP has more than twice the millions of lines of code it did when it was Win95.

And? OSX Tiger has double that of XP according to this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_lines_of_code

Vista has twice the millions of lines of code of XP. Windows has become far too big for MS to handle - Vista is now over 60 million lines of code, and all of them are maintained by MS.

Tiger has 86 million lines of code. I imagine Leopard has even more.

Another problem involves backwards compatibility; this is difficult because the API's were poorly thought out to begin with, so programmers worked around them on the underlying implementation.

And removed most of the clutter with XP. That's why you use DOSBOX as an emulator.

The lack of a hardware platform - support for multiple platforms makes MS's task tons more difficult than Apple's.

But one they accomplish quite well considering it'll run on everything - including Apple machines.

I'm goign to skip the rest because your argument is essentially flawed - firstly you didn't know that XP and Vista are NT based, not DOS based. Secondly OSX actually has a a higher SLOC count that either of them.

I don't mind people criticising OSs but I do expect them to know why their criticising them.

I would say 2012 would be a safer bet.

Let's split the difference at 2011 then? :D

Certainly not according to Vista's default security: "Need your permissions to continue-" prompts.

UAC can be disabled and, even if it's not, quickly settles down once you've used the program. It's not that much of an issue.

Yes, MS converted Outlook to Entourage, and decided not to port Access, Visio, or Picasa to OS X.

Well, fine. That's why OSX isn't really a lot of use to me just now though.
 
Its thrown when someone follows Apple's lead without question. There are some who seemingly think Apple is infallible. If we didn't appreciate Apple's deeds we wouldn't be here. Appreciation doesn't mean you have to be a mindless drone. This is a computer company, not a religon. You have to take take good with the bad, except Jobs for both his talents and his faults, and call them out when you think they're not doing something they should.
 
virus!!!!

I heard that there are absolutely NNNOOO viruses that are made for the Mac. Is this really true. Or is this just what people think because Macs are used by very few people. (which shouldn't be).:confused:
 
Its thrown when someone follows Apple's lead without question. There are some who seemingly think Apple is infallible. If we didn't appreciate Apple's deeds we wouldn't be here. Appreciation doesn't mean you have to be a mindless drone. This is a computer company, not a religon. You have to take take good with the bad, except Jobs for both his talents and his faults, and call them out when you think they're not doing something they should.

No, it gets used far more often than that, as your post demonstrates. Terms such as "religion" and "infallible" and "mindless drone" should never appear in a serious discussion. This is an ad hominem, not an argument.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.