It's kinda funny, on Amazon.com, the low end Mac Mini (which is officially at the end of its life) out-sells the new iMacs. It would be stupid for Apple to kill off the Mini.
Where did you see that it's officially EOL?
It's kinda funny, on Amazon.com, the low end Mac Mini (which is officially at the end of its life) out-sells the new iMacs. It would be stupid for Apple to kill off the Mini.
Seems I may go that way, except, I love the portability of a laptop.Hackintoshs.. are they possible with any laptops out there?
That makes some sense to me. We shall find out in a few weeks.HAs anyone actually shown any EOL information? Surely, it being that Mac Minis are actually selling quite well that the stocks would have dwindled by now? Apple itself has a finite inventory (say 6-7 weeks) presumably, and the companies themselves resell them would also have a limited supply, no?
So that potentially being so, if they're still selling, but not making more, and have an EOL, wouldn't we be seeing stores selling out now/in a week or two?
To bad the mini at $600 is bad buy and at $800 a big ripoff. Droping the $800 down to $600 does not help much.I should clarify: the official EOL is for the current 1.8 GHz model, based on the reports that European retailers can no longer order the 1.8GHz model, which presumably means Apple is not making any more of them.
It doesn't mean the Mini is dead; it is quite possible a new and improved Mac Mini is in the horizon. Or it simply means Mac Mini is only available as 2.0GHz model from now on.
To bad the mini at $600 is bad buy and at $800 a big ripoff. Droping the $800 down to $600 does not help much.
maybe it will work at $500 with 2gb of ram and a hd size bump.
So, why don't they make an affordable Mac that you can expand, like the MacPro, one that is smaller since the Pro is downright HUGE! Why is Apple always so afraid to make things that people can upgrade themselves--eMac, iMac, Mini, all computers you can't upgrade components other than the RAM by yourself.
Is this so hard? There is less money in it for Apple. I'm sure they'd much rather sell you a more closed/restricted unit as it's more likely to encourage you to buy anew after, say, 18 months rather than buying from a third party and slamming in a new processor/gpu/whatever to keep that machine for 36 months - Apple sees no new money from you that way.
If Apple were release this highly upgradeable, affordable, "mid-tower" machine no one will shut up about, what's in it for them? You'd buy the bare bones configuration and then hop on over to crucial or owc or whoever to beef it up and keep it going - you know it, they know it.
I think half the reason the Mac Pro costs what it costs is due to the convenience of customisation. A Mac Pro customer could very well keep that machine for 5+ years, potentially without Apple seeing another penny. So they make sure they get a chunk up front.
tl;dr There's no magical super awesome mid-range desktop coming, accept it - buy a Mac Pro or "you don't need configurability enough" in Apple's eyes
And Apples eyes are becoming increasingly myopic. When they rid themselves of their traditional power user base, who is going to be there when the fad teenagers leave them for the next cool thing? And when it comes to money, Apple has a choice, and it doesn't involve me wasting money on another iMac or spending $3000 on a workstation. That's like choosing between a Lincoln version of a Ford Fiesta and a semi. They can either take between $1300-$1700 of my money or they can have none at all. I'm past the point of giving Jobs the benefit of the doubt. I'm not alone on this either.
If Apple would put out a Mac Mini that is configurable at a reasonable price (That is part of the fun of owning a PC.), it is true that there would be a delay in people later buying a new one.
But their market share would jump maybe 10%.
That being said, there is a very good chance that Apple doesn't have the manufacturing capacity to jump market share that quickly.
So I guess there was no news today about a mac mini upgrade at Macworld. Although I don't think it's dead yet. Maybe a mid-year update?
Its already two years behind. Its toast.
And Apples eyes are becoming increasingly myopic. When they rid themselves of their traditional power user base, who is going to be there when the fad teenagers leave them for the next cool thing? And when it comes to money, Apple has a choice, and it doesn't involve me wasting money on another iMac or spending $3000 on a workstation. That's like choosing between a Lincoln version of a Ford Fiesta and a semi. They can either take between $1300-$1700 of my money or they can have none at all. I'm past the point of giving Jobs the benefit of the doubt. I'm not alone on this either.