3Memos said:iMac would be the better choice.
Thanks, that's what my gut instinct was telling me. I may still pick up a mini as a browsing/itunes machine. It would save me my quarterly PC reload on at least one machine. lol
3Memos said:iMac would be the better choice.
James Craner said:You are correct, buy the Mac mini now and it will come with Panther installed. My best guess that Apple will announce Tiger at the World Wide Developer Conference in May, with shipping in May / June. Tiger should work fine with the present release of the Mac Mini and you should just be able to upgrade the OS without affecting your existing files and applications (in theory anyway). Unlike Windows that appears to be slower on the same hardware with every release, all of the OS X main releases have actually improved the performance of the system, hopefully Tiger will be the same.
Buy with confidence now and then upgrade to Tiger for $129 when it comes out.
nightowl said:I agree with the above, but with something to think about: Tiger will be released May/June or so this year, with an asking price of $129. If you can hold out a while longer, that's a good chunk of the price of the Mac Mini. My plan is to wait until Tiger is released, and get Tiger, iLife, etc all together, which makes the hardware portion of the computer very reasonably priced..
wdlove said:
Hoffer said:I just ordered one!!! I got the 1.42 gigahertz system with superdrive and bluetooth. I'll order a 1 gig RAM stick from Crucial.com. I have absolute faith that I'll be able to get the mini open myself.
3Memos said:iMac would be the better choice.
numediaman said:I suppose this is correct -- but then again, a 2.5 GHz G5 would be best.
I currently do video and audio editing (and DVD creation) on a 500 Mhz G4 PowerBook. My point is that the mini should be able to do even more than my PowerBook -- and it has the same inputs (2 USB and 1 FW).
My own view is that if you don't need a new monitor, a mini would be an affordable way to go Mac.
BarfBag said:I don't know what to think of that. It does make a good point, Apple should include a low end LCD.
I sware, people are born Microsexual, or Macrosexual. Serious. Some of my friends would give anything to own one of these, and some others can't stand Mac. Me? I'm a PC user (who's hating it, BTW.). This is what I've been waiting for for longer then I can remember. I just hope that this doesn't turn into another cube situation.
BTW- I'm a true born Macrosexual.![]()
za9ra22 said:The Mini is certainly not the powerhouse Mac that it would be nice for it to be, but let's not talk it down to the point where it becomes common currency that it is good for little more than email and a bit of casual web browsing, or bashing out a quick bit of typing.
za9ra22 said:It's getting silly again - recommending an iMac for DV editing when there are plenty of people with G4s of consisderably less power than the Mini who have been running iMovie or Final Cut (Pro or Express versions) with absolutely no problems for a long time before the G5 existed.
While it's true that an iMac would provide better performance, it also costs more, and while it's true that the 4200rpm drive in the Mini has potential to degrade performance, I've noticed absolutely no issues with DV editing on my iBook G4 (800), and it's been used extensively for that purpose since I bought it, along with a G4 450 of October 1999 vintage. Rendering is a bit slugging on both in comparison to a G5, but it's not crically so.
As for tying up the FW port with the DV camcorder - I'd suggest the answer to that is an external FW drive with a port to daisy-chain the camcorder - that arrangement works fine for me - though capturing directly to the internal HD instead hasn't proven problematic in the projects where that has been necessary.
The Mini is certainly not the powerhouse Mac that it would be nice for it to be, but let's not talk it down to the point where it becomes common currency that it is good for little more than email and a bit of casual web browsing, or bashing out a quick bit of typing.
And one more thing that's worth noting - at the rate that Macs typically hold their prices, people buying a Mini are not going to get severely burned if they then decide the system isn't right for them and want to sell it on. In itself, that could make it a great way to jump into a Mac without having to worry too much about whether it's as perfect as we all say it is!!
pigbat said:My kids do a lot of light video editing. Can the mini handle this or should I be looking at the imac? I prefer the headless approach but maight be able to get used to the idea of an all-in-one.
ravenstar said:I should note this was our first attempt at video editing, and we never had to refer to any help or documentation. The ease of use of iMovie and iDVD more than made up for the time it took to encode the video.
takao said:i've read about daisychaining fw devices in this thread
this requires two fw ports on the external HD right ? but i have problems location HD's with two of them ...
i seriously doubt that daisychaining works with an USB2 and firewire right ?
any good recommendations wiht 2 firewireports _and_ USB 2.0 connector ? or would buying an firewire switch etc. better alternative ...
any good combined firewire + USB2.0 HUBs out there ?
ravenstar said:Maybe this will help. My son and I just finished producing a DVD for the school of his elementary school drama production using a 2 1/2 year old PowerBook G4 (800 MHz G4, 512MB Ram) to do all the editing in iMovie. We used an external 40GB Firewire drive to store the movie owing to the fact I don't own a digital camera and needed to use another system to digitize the video. The only operation we really noticed take time during editing was rendering the titles (20 - 30 seconds to render a rather lengthy scrolling cast list), but because the rendering is done in the background that didn't slow us down at all.
Now when it comes to encoding the DVD, that's another story. The powerbook didn't have a superdrive, so I took the hard disk to a lab dual processor 2GHz G5 tower to create the DVD. Even with all that horsepower, it took over an hour to encode the 40 minute video. That's the kind of process I'd run overnight if I had my own system.
Hoffer said:I'd love a 7,200 RPM drive because it would help with boot time and a number of other things.
Don't panic said:i buy the "number of other things", but why do you need to reboot often? I only very occasionally do it on my systems, when I install something new, or if i really need to save the battery on the powerbook, and I need to save also the sleep light power.
A handful of seconds every several weeks don't seem something to be worried about