Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Selling my body to buy Leopard

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: On the day Leopard is released, I will be doing the following in front of my local Apple store in the International Plaza, Tampa, FL, to raise money for the purchase:

* Selling my body (to females only*)
* Posing for pictures (fee required)
* Signing autographs (fee required)
* Giving interviews to the media (no fee required)
* Accepting donations (tin cup provided)

* Must be over 18

All donations to my PayPal account gratefully accepted. (Please don't forget the hyphen.)

Gators-Fan
 
So excited. Historically, what is the fastest way to get new OS's from Apple? Ordering online or going to stores?
 
Leopard will rock!

I predict Leopard will sweep some thought into the heads of all those intelligent Windows users. It baffles my brain to consider how only a small percent of people use OS X. Windows users are so quick to rave about how expensive going mac is, as they forget to see how much money they are pissing into their PC’s. I hope it catches on, and OS X becomes the norm. I hope I can see Microsoft go down. And the world will be a better place. Haha.
 
running 9a559 here. I hope there is another version that's gold. Most everything runs fine but I have a couple programs that just crash.

As I'm running 9A599 on my Mac Pro, I'm a little surprised that Apple has declded on releasing this AFTER the fact as either Gold Master or Release Candidate. It has way to many bugs as well as unfinished graphical touches such as finally eliminating Aqua scroll bars and such. I'm hoping Apple thinks this one through and doesn't bow to pressure, I'd be more than willing to wait one or two more months in getting this ready. Plus I feel as though the efforts in getting the iPhone launched AND locked down are taking away from Leopard development. The lack of Fast OS Switching, full Resolution Independence and other "top secret features" from the beta's that Jobs has touted from day one from this most recent beta is disappointing. I hope there is at least one more beta release before Gold Master.
 
As I'm running 9A599 on my Mac Pro, I'm a little surprised that Apple has declded on releasing this AFTER the fact as either Gold Master or Release Candidate. It has way to many bugs as well as unfinished graphical touches such as finally eliminating Aqua scroll bars and such. I'm hoping Apple thinks this one through and doesn't bow to pressure, I'd be more than willing to wait one or two more months in getting this ready. Plus I feel as though the efforts in getting the iPhone launched AND locked down are taking away from Leopard development. The lack of Fast OS Switching, full Resolution Independence and other "top secret features" from the beta's that Jobs has touted from day one from this most recent beta is disappointing. I hope there is at least one more beta release before Gold Master.

Who ever said that the aqua scrollbars were changing? You? Come off it.
 
We dont call it beta at this point anymore, these are RC's, I dont doubt that things like the aqua scrollbars can be completely fixed upon release, they probably have a global flag in their code which they can switch for the release compile, same goes for a number of different features which may be in there but have just not been enabled in the beta en rc process so the rc users dont get underwhelmed.
 
The lack of Fast OS Switching, full Resolution Independence and other "top secret features" from the beta's that Jobs has touted from day one from this most recent beta is disappointing. I hope there is at least one more beta release before Gold Master.

I can understand being disappointed that the Fast OS Switching was not feasible enough, but can't this be handled with Parallels or always shutting down windows with the hibernate command? I know neither are an exact replacement, but they should adequately meet most needs.

And please read through the threads - Resolution Independence is in Leopard, it just isn't enabled because it relies on developers coding for it and the existence of displays with higher pixel densities. This has been explained countless times on MR and once or twice in this thread.

The "top secret features" were revealed in June. New finder. New dock behaviors. Quicklook. Back to my mac.
 
You'll find those issues you encounter are more of MSN and Yahoo's fault that Apple's. The services you can't access have always been low on the compatibility list for those companies, that's life, send them complaint, don't misplace your blame.

Many people in the US use AIM instead of MSN. It's very common and works quite well, if you have friends with macs, then I'd recommend just getting a simple AIM account and trying iChat's text, audio and video based chats. They really rock, and you can't even compare them to MSN or Yahoo.

MSN and Yahoo support in iChat isn't something Apple can just add, it's not their call, it's the other two companies, both of which I'm sure would be against the idea, or charge significantly for the ability.

Instead of complaining about how useless iChat is to you because you don't use it, try complaining to Microsoft and Yahoo about supplying decent IM apps for the mac.

ok i will respond to this part of your reply the other part is relevant.

As for getting other people onto ichat that is impossible no one wants to open up a AIM account or pay for .mac for the privilege. AIM is seen as a real black sheep here. There was no complaint made about iChat i just dismiss it as useless to me. Because i have a fancy im program dose not mean i am going to force it on my friends. It is hard enough getting them to upgrade there version of MSN so i can transfer them onto yahoo witch is a lovely program that causes me no problems and dose most of the things i need it to do without skype.

iChat is useless if no one can use it. If it gains yahoo or MSN support then it becomes useful to 90% of the world. AIM is only an American thing, it even has America in the name. That is one of the reasons my colleges shun it, it gives them the wrong impression.
 
iLife '08 included in Leopard?

Hi, I am new to the mac world and am a bit naive.. I want to upgrade to Leopard when it comes out, and am also interested in upgrading to iLife '08 right now. My question is, will iLife '08 be included when I upgrade to Leopard or will I still have to buy that separately? I know that people are down on the new iLife, but I have no choice, it's the direction my school has gone to in the classroom, so I am going to do the same on my own mac. Any feedback would be appreciated!:apple:
 
Since he is in breach of his NDA, no matter what "geek" he is, his comments are most definitely not legit. Just for making these comments to you he and his company could get into big trouble.

Wipe that smudge off your nose. :rolleyes:
And his company isn't liable since he didn't get it from his company. I've said this before and I will say it again if Apple wants to stop this **** all they need to do is release, release candidates. Its as simple as that. As long as Apple remains being an ***hat, this crap will continue and I welcome it. Big trouble. Yah whatever.
 
As I'm running 9A599 on my Mac Pro, I'm a little surprised that Apple has declded on releasing this AFTER the fact as either Gold Master or Release Candidate. It has way to many bugs as well as unfinished graphical touches such as finally eliminating Aqua scroll bars and such. I'm hoping Apple thinks this one through and doesn't bow to pressure, I'd be more than willing to wait one or two more months in getting this ready. Plus I feel as though the efforts in getting the iPhone launched AND locked down are taking away from Leopard development. The lack of Fast OS Switching, full Resolution Independence and other "top secret features" from the beta's that Jobs has touted from day one from this most recent beta is disappointing. I hope there is at least one more beta release before Gold Master.

What are you going to do with the aqua buttons, radio buttons, check-boxes, sliders, sheets etc.

Aqua is not going away entirely in 10.5.
 
Hi, I am new to the mac world and am a bit naive.. I want to upgrade to Leopard when it comes out, and am also interested in upgrading to iLife '08 right now. My question is, will iLife '08 be included when I upgrade to Leopard or will I still have to buy that separately? I know that people are down on the new iLife, but I have no choice, it's the direction my school has gone to in the classroom, so I am going to do the same on my own mac. Any feedback would be appreciated!:apple:

iLife and Leopard have always been separate products. When you buy Leopard, you just get Leopard. Same with iLife. They are separate products.

In fact, you will get both for free* only if you buy a brand new mac...

*Excluding 2K for the computer ;)
 
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: On the day Leopard is released, I will be doing the following in front of my local Apple store in the International Plaza, Tampa, FL, to raise money for the purchase:

* Selling my body (to females only*)

You'd make more money if you removed that restriction.

ok i will respond to this part of your reply the other part is relevant.

As for getting other people onto ichat that is impossible no one wants to open up a AIM account or pay for .mac for the privilege.

What you mean to say is none of your friends want to. Or no one you know. Since I got a mac in 2001 I have met loads of people that previously didn't use AIM and got a simple account (not like it's very hard now, is it).

As for .Mac, you firstly get a free trial with no prior commitment to buy, then at the end of the trial your allowed to use your .Mac member name with iChat without paying for the rest of the features.

AIM is seen as a real black sheep here. There was no complaint made about iChat i just dismiss it as useless to me. Because i have a fancy im program dose not mean i am going to force it on my friends. It is hard enough getting them to upgrade there version of MSN so i can transfer them onto yahoo witch is a lovely program that causes me no problems and dose most of the things i need it to do without skype.

You have no issues with the mac version of Yahoo IM ? Wow that's a first.

iChat is useless if no one can use it. If it gains yahoo or MSN support then it becomes useful to 90% of the world. AIM is only an American thing, it even has America in the name. That is one of the reasons my colleges shun it, it gives them the wrong impression.

AIM is mainly an American thing, but isn't restricted to America, many people in many countries use it and have accounts with it. It may not be their default account, but they have an account.

Many people use iChat, it's actually a very useful and well-used IM in the world of mac users. Where is Apple based ? America. Where do they sell a lot of their products and debut their products ? America.

Apple isn't likely to add Yahoo or MSN support to iChat. To do that they'd have to drop their very useful AIM partnership that's utilised by most of their customers (notice: I didn't say all, or you). Plus I'd imagine Microsoft would charge them an arm and a leg for the privilege, which to be economical, would mean every end user would end up paying more for Leopard for the "privilege".

If you don't like AIM then you do know you can use the jabber client of iChat for Gtalk, don't you ? Sure, it's not MSN and Yahoo which seems to be something you wont budge on, but yet another decent offering from another company.

You'll find lots of people who agree it's silly that iChat doesn't support MSN, you'll also find most of iChat's actual users disagreeing with you because the network it is on right now is working much better than MSN or Yahoo for them ever did.

You should try it some time, try a multiple-person audio/video chat, and then come back here and tell me that Yahoo and MSN really are better IM programs.

Note: I'm not saying you should switch all your friends, I'm simply saying your giving a really good application a bad rip because it doesn't work to the standards you already have... and there are many, many different standards out there... try some of the others some time and you might discover something.
 
Many people use iChat, it's actually a very useful and well-used IM in the world of mac users. Where is Apple based ? America. Where do they sell a lot of their products and debut their products ? America.

Where do they also sell a lot of products? Europe. We're not like, some underdeveloped outsiders. I can't help that MSN is the standard here.

You should try it some time, try a multiple-person audio/video chat, and then come back here and tell me that Yahoo and MSN really are better IM programs.

Sure. I don't personally know any people with a .mac account though (afaik).
 
Archive & Install issue for G5s fixed?

Can someone please tell me whether the "archive & install issue" for G5s has been fixed yet? That's a deal-breaker for me.
 
I'm thinking that Aqua will go away in Leopard. I've got three reasons why:

1) We're seeing more and more Apps that are using iTunes style scroll bars and buttons and getting rid of the aqua stuff. Even the new finder has the iTunes style buttons already.

2) iPhone software is supposed to be Leopard, right? Well, all the buttons, drop down lists, etc. on web pages aren't aqua at all. They are the iTunes style gradient gray buttons.

3) Apple is all about consistent branding. Granted, with Tiger we have some brushed metal apps and some that are the matte gray deal, but they have made an effort to make everything visually consistent in Leopard. No more brushed metal. Now everything looks the same. But iTunes still has different scroll bars? Doesn't make much sense.

Maybe the scroll bars will remain aqua, but I think at least all the blue pill shaped buttons will be replaced for sure. And it wouldn't surprise me to see iTunes scroll bars.
 
Wait For Me Wild-Bill

Not multi-core aware!???!!!?! Maybe that's one of the "secret" features??? Leopard runs on just one core? Maybe by 10.5.5 they'll make it multi-core aware. Guess we really don't need a Mac Pro update since there will be seven cores doing nothing........ :mad:
Relax Wild-Bill. And wait for me. ;) If you run multi-threaded applications like Toast and Handbrake it doesn't matter how few cores the system uses. I know I can use all 8 by only running one application like Handbrake. So bring it on.
 
Supposedly, if you pre-order from Apple's website, Leopard will arrive via FedEX the day of or day before it is available in stores.

Does anyone know when the pre-ordering begins? I have the iPhone credit and can only use it online because the only store we have is the Apple Store in Bestbuy and they will not be able to take the coupon.

- James
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.