Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So. I'm lying it bed. The iPad is nearby. It's 3 in the morning. I realise I've been woken up by an audible email alert, and want to mute the iPad.

So I either:

a) flick the mute switch with one hand - 1 step I can do in the dark by touch.

or:

b) open the ipad cover - possibly two hands required
press the home or power/sleep button - the screen lights up, annoying my wife and shocking my own rested pupils
swipe the screen to wake the iPad from sleep
reach over to the down volume button and hold that for a second
reach up to the power/sleep button and press that to turn the screen off
close the case

Give me the mute switch any day.

And no, don't make it customisable. Consistency of operation on all iPads.

Amen. This totally happens to me a couple nights a week, and I totally want my mute switch! I've locked rotation maybe two times. When it goes wonky I just flip it one way or the other until it goes back the way I want it.
 
Of course it doesn't brick first gen AppleTVs, but mine doesn't show in the AirTunes list. Just my AirPort Expresses.

This is what I'm talking about. So will AppleTV not show up in iTunes like it does in 10.0? If I use Remote on the iPhone and connect to my AppleTV will I not be able to control the remote speakers? My AppleTV is set up as an AirPort Speaker right now and I can turn it on and off from the computer under Multiple Speakers.
 
I didn't say that at all. I said that there are hundreds of features that people could ask for an option one way or the other.



"Wow son?" I just asked a simple question. Evidently, the answer is that OS X is already 100% 64-bit with the option to boot into a 32-bit kernel as needed.

No. You didn't read what i said. Most macs don't boot into the 64-bit kernel by default, and many existing macs CAN'T boot into the kernel AT ALL, so it depends on the hardware, but for some, Mac OS X is NOT completely 64-bit. But like i said, it doesn't matter that much, i'm just trying to make my point...

EDIT: So, my point is, the 64 bit kernel is the option. In fact, outside of anything running OS X Server, there is no mac that boots into it by default. Except the mac pro.
 
No. You didn't read what i said. Most macs don't boot into the 64-bit kernel by default, and many existing macs CAN'T boot into the kernel AT ALL, so it depends on the hardware, but for some, Mac OS X is NOT completely 64-bit. But like i said, it doesn't matter that much, i'm just trying to make my point...

EDIT: So, my point is, the 64 bit kernel is the option. In fact, outside of anything running OS X Server, there is no mac that boots into it by default.

Most macs don't boot into K64 by default but that's only to save people from kext troubles. I have been booting K64 since the day SL released since every 3rd party kext I use was already K64 ready at launch. So if there are people not booting K64, simply because it's not default...
 
I didn't say that at all. I said that there are hundreds of features that people could ask for an option one way or the other.

Yes, I realize that, and my point was that it's not the same as adding features with options, because they *removed* a feature that a lot of people liked and got accustomed to.
 
Most macs don't boot into K64 by default but that's only to save people from kext troubles. I have been booting K64 since the day SL released since every 3rd party kext I use was already K64 ready at launch. So if there are people not booting K64, simply because it's not default...

Nah, many macs wont let you boot into the 64 bit kernel... Screw it, why am i arguing with you people. Just go google it or something :rolleyes: or click this link
 
Nah, many macs wont let you boot into the 64 bit kernel... Screw it, why am i arguing with you people. Just go google it or something :rolleyes: or click this link

Did you even read that article? All Macs (except the minis) in the last three years can boot in 64-bit mode. What iBug2 said wasn't incorrect. And the Mac Pro does use it by default in addition to the servers.
 
Did you even read that article? All Macs (except the minis) in the last three years can boot in 64-bit mode. What iBug2 said wasn't incorrect. And the Mac Pro does use it by default in addition to the servers.

Believe it or not, apple made intel macs before then. :rolleyes: Plus, you're wrong, there is no mention of macbooks anywhere in that list.
 
WiiDSmoker said:
Just because people can or cannot afford something does not mean that I cannot debate a feature being changed or going away.

Darn Tootin!! I'm with you on this one. :)

The Obsessive-Compulsive Club will meet in the small room adjacent to the auditorium at 9:14:55. Unless someone has any problems with that. :eek:

Remember to be prompt as there is old business to attend to, since the 2009 and earlier 2010 meetings were postponed because of objections to scheduling details.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I just want the Airplay video support on the Apple TV.
 
Believe it or not, apple made intel macs before then. :rolleyes: Plus, you're wrong, there is no mention of macbooks anywhere in that list.

You said "many existing" macs in your original post, which I took to mean modern macs.

You are right, the MacBook doesn't officially support 64 bit (surprising), although it can be done.

But whatever, I feel we are arguing over stupid details. :)
 
You said "many existing" macs in your original post, which I took to mean modern macs.

You are right, the MacBook doesn't officially support 64 bit (surprising), although it can be done.

But whatever, I feel we are arguing over stupid details. :)

Oh, that's where the confusion is, i mean existing as in macs still in use. Woops :p
 
I've been in a holding pattern on my iPad... waiting for 4.2.

I have so many damn apps that I can't even think about adding another page of them... so I've just been hanging out, waiting for 4.2... I _really_ can't wait!

Derek
 
I would actually argue that had Apple implemented the switch as a normal mute switch, with IOS 4.0 that would reveal that the switch is now magically a screen rotation lock switch and you goons would eat it up.

You're going to agree with Apple no matter what and that is a huge problem.

No, I'm not trolling. I like Apple alot, but it gets tiring to see user who do not like choice and love to bend over and take it.

It's the tragedy of MR. All these pathetic sheep who bow to Steve's every whim. Four legs good, two legs better eh?

Every OSX update I pray that Apple fix spotlight. Remember when that used to work? But no, they'd much rather spend their time screwing around with a perfectly good orientation switch. Back to the Mac indeed.

BTW, WiiDSmoker, just jailbreak the sucker when the dev team step in with the 4.2 JB for folders and orientation lock!
 
Almost everyone on here should/would be savvy enough to know a devices shortcomings long before they purchase it. The fact you have purchased it is acceptance of those shortcomings. To then hack on it time and time again when it doesn't do things exactly to your taste is just pathetic.

Deal with it or sell it and buy something else instead. You're a bunch of whinging tools that argue for the sake of it more often than not.

There are 100 things that could be done better on iPad. No ones denying that. But fact is you buy the device for what it is, not what you wish it was. get over it. There are shotcomings on almost all tech things i've bought in recent years but you live with it or don't buy it to begin with.
 
It's the tragedy of MR. All these pathetic sheep who bow to Steve's every whim. Four legs good, two legs better eh?

You're wrong. I personally don't care about orientation lock; I'd rather Apple focus their effects on something that I care about. You obviously are just as selfish -- you don't want them to work on things I want, your only concern is what you want. It goes round and round like this forever. Suck it up and deal with it, or buy another device.
 
This is what I am gonna do...a restore to factory settings and install 4.2 and then restore from backup and then put my apps back on it one by one...

Wait wait wait. Restore to factory, and then restore from a backup, effectively wiping the factory settings and replacing everything again? What's the purpose of that? Restoring from a backup is like nothing ever happened, regarding that fresh factory install.

My proximity sensor was never fixed on my iPhone 4 on the last update. Anyone else still having issues? Thought was to be fixed <_<

Yup, issue still exists here too. That, and my scratched unscratchable stronger-than-a-helicopter-windshield front gorilla glass.

Apple will never be able to position the iPad as a productivity tool again! All of these lost seconds will never fly in the enterprise environment.

Just give it to me Apple. For gods sake, give it to me HARD!! NOW!!

I can't wait for the flood of posts saying "my rotate switch is broken."

Sweet God. This thread rocks. :) :p
 
So should I upgrade or wait? ROFL, sorry I had to ask before someone else did. Or maybe I need to wait until iOS 10.75 to the 10 power, Black Leopard is released. :D
 
No. You didn't read what i said. Most macs don't boot into the 64-bit kernel by default, and many existing macs CAN'T boot into the kernel AT ALL, so it depends on the hardware, but for some, Mac OS X is NOT completely 64-bit. But like i said, it doesn't matter that much, i'm just trying to make my point...

EDIT: So, my point is, the 64 bit kernel is the option. In fact, outside of anything running OS X Server, there is no mac that boots into it by default. Except the mac pro.

I did read what you said. And I understand your point. It's just irrelevant to my question. An OS update isn't going to make hardware that can't run a 64-bit kernel run a 64-bit kernel.

The original poster asked if OS X will finally be 100% 64-bit with the 10.6.5 update. Evidently, it already is. As long as you have compatible hardware and kexts.

Yes, I realize that, and my point was that it's not the same as adding features with options, because they *removed* a feature that a lot of people liked and got accustomed to.

And my point was that a line has to be drawn somewhere. It's not a question of how hard it is to add the option. Apple draws the line at a different point than you would.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.