If so, upgrading to 10.6 might be a little challenging for the Hackintosh community.![]()
Not to mention the millions whose machines shipped with earlier OSs and bought the leopard disk.
If so, upgrading to 10.6 might be a little challenging for the Hackintosh community.![]()
A service pack fixes more things than it breaks and an OS upgrade add new features while breaking more things than it fixes?Well: What's the difference between a service pack and an OS upgrade?
...
Of course, all types of releases include bug fixes.
That seems outright bogus. Windows users pay extra for a 64-bit version, and it's still not capable of the performance that Grand Central and OpenCL make possible. Even though most end users don't care about the technology, they will certainly notice the speed boost and the extra 6 GB of disk space things that Windows users can't buy at any price. When's the last time Windows got smaller and/or faster from one release to the next?
Well, read more about the fix that W7 represents before spitting MS-fanboy comments here...the driver structure remains the same with a little more visual crap, as is common for MS's overhyped efforts.
W7 is too little, too late; and Mac users couldn't care less anyway.
Open CL will not work on my macbook. It has an Itel GMX3100![]()
If so, upgrading to 10.6 might be a little challenging for the Hackintosh community.![]()
I suspect the upgrade installer will simply search for an exisitng Leopard install to permit the upgrade.![]()
True, although Microsoft's software money comes from enterprise licensing, as well as Office being a de facto standard for both end users and corporate environments.the only reason microsoft can't charge $29 for software is because software is their own money-maker. Apple makes their bucks on hardware, not software. So for Apple, $29 isn't a big deal
Apple said that Leopard would be released in October, and that turned out to be October 26. So I'm guessing that Apple will set a firm release date for late September.By September do they mean September 1st or any time during September?
Apple said that Leopard would be released in October, and that turned out to be October 26. So I'm guessing that Apple will set a firm release date for late September.
Personally, though, 9/9/09 would be kind of cool.
By September do they mean September 1st or any time during September?
I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be a retail upgrade disk that checks to see if Leopard is installed prior to installing.
EDIT: Or it could run some machine ID check to validate the install. (just for clarification of a later post of mine)
Apple said that Leopard would be released in October, and that turned out to be October 26. So I'm guessing that Apple will set a firm release date for late September.
Personally, though, 9/9/09 would be kind of cool.
Speak for yourself. As a happy Windows 7 user here, I care more about Microsoft then I do Apple.
It seems like you are the joker here. Windows 7 offers a fix for ripped Vista users, that's all. Leopard is already the standard for superior OS experience, and SL is just gonna extend that gap. Windows 7 hasn't changed anything in its drivers mess, as well as a lot of other crap that already exists in Vista. People are converting in droves, so don't worry about MS and their poor OEMs...they will be dead sooner than you think.