You'll never see Microsoft sell a Windows product for $29. Go Apple!
Probably not, but Microsoft should! After all Windows7 is an incremental update to Vista, same as Snow Leopard to Leopard.
You'll never see Microsoft sell a Windows product for $29. Go Apple!
I'm sure someone else posted it, but here is the page with all the other features.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html
What is amusing? Apple probably has to charge for Snow Leopard, why? That Exchange support isn't free. So MS is taking all us Mac owners to the bank with a feature that less than 1% is probably going to use.
Not sure if anyone else has touched on this here but NZ residents get the upgrade for $19 NZ.
YAY!
Have a look at this: http://www.apple.com/nz/macosx/
I do hope you aren't implying that Apple can use the Exchange support for free. Exchange is Microsofts pride and joy (well along with all their server products, especially Sharepoint). I don't think Microsoft likes Apple enough to give it away for free.actually, Apple has to charge for this update in line with their interpretation of federal regulations. This is why they charge iPod touch owners for the software updates and not the iPhone owners... the iPhone owners are on a subscription, while the touch owners would get a modification without a payment... which apparently Appled deemed illegal. Plus, if they were on the fence, I'm sure they leaned towards the side that would equal extra profit (but the iphone free upgrade shows they didnt necessarily want to charge)
here are some articles about the accounting issues (and the controversy with Apple's decisions)
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1162
http://www.macworld.com/article/131991/2008/02/ipodtouch.html
on another note, I'd bet the SL installer for the upgrade discs checks for a current Leopard installation. for those of you wanting to wipe your disks, I'm guessing Apple deems the erase & install method sufficient for you...
As a current Tiger user, I'll be excited (enough) to buy the $169.00 box set when it comes out. Just hope that one isn't delayed: "If your Intel-based Mac is running Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger, purchase the Mac Box Set (when available)." The words "when available" scare me a bit...
BTW, how do we know the box set is going to be $169.00? The Snow Leopard spec page just calls it an "affordable package."
I actually find it funny. You perfectly well explained why nothing else is even possible. Described your question as being dumb. Asked it anyway. Actually, this just gives me an opportunity to comment on a post that never should have existed to get closer to my avatar![]()
I'm sorry for asking such a lame question, but if Snow Leopard ships in September, that means if I want to wait until it's preinstalled on my future MBP I should wait to purchase until Sept too? Ah, dumb question, I know.
jesus christ monkey balls! that's an even bigger surprise than the US price!
we usually get totally jipped on the price here, but somehow this is actually cheaper than the US price. I hope it's not a typo
at the moment $19 New Zealand dollars = $11.73 U.S. dollars
can it really be right?
Snow Leopard Up-to-Date Program.
If you purchased a qualifying Mac on or after June 8, 2009, that does not include Mac OS X Snow Leopard, you can upgrade for $19.00
I think most people have come to accept this. I thought Early 09 was too soon but Sept 09 is acceptable, IMO.I'm surprised more people haven't thrown up a fuss because SL doesn't support PowerPC processors... Intel only from now on.
Snow Leopard Tech Specs
I'm surprised more people haven't thrown up a fuss because SL doesn't support PowerPC processors... Intel only from now on.
Snow Leopard Tech Specs
Mac OS X Snow Leopard refines the elegant Mac OS X user experience with lots of little touches and performance improvements that will make using your Mac even more enjoyable. It also includes a few big foundation technologies designed to tap the power of today’s computer hardware and provide a strong base for innovation. If you purchased a qualifying system or Xserve on or after June 8, 2009 that does not include Mac OS X Snow Leopard, you can upgrade to Mac OS X Snow Leopard for $9.95.*
Please check back on June 16, 2009, for additional information.
* * Covers product plus shipping and handling fee. U.S. customers add appropriate sales tax.
I'm surprised more people haven't thrown up a fuss because SL doesn't support PowerPC processors... Intel only from now on.
Snow Leopard Tech Specs
how do you know apple won't do that?I'm disappointed for the most part. I was really hoping for a new iPhone-like "Marble" interface. I would have paid the full $129.00 for that alone. Next, my graphics card isn't supported under Open CL (ATI Radeon X1600).
...
The same here. I am very tempted to upgrade just based on price and the changes in a few areas of the OS, but I wonder what real-world benefits SL will bring, if any, for Macs which don't have any Open CL compatible graphics capabilities, like my BlackBook with Intel's X3100.
It IS ridiculous -- the G5 is 64-bit, and Apple just dropped them -- 10.6 should have been supported on G5s... Now those PowerMacs will never see their true potential...
Quite true with the federal regulations.actually, Apple has to charge for this update in line with their interpretation of federal regulations. This is why they charge iPod touch owners for the software updates and not the iPhone owners... the iPhone owners are on a subscription, while the touch owners would get a modification without a payment... which apparently Appled deemed illegal. Plus, if they were on the fence, I'm sure they leaned towards the side that would equal extra profit (but the iphone free upgrade shows they didnt necessarily want to charge)
here are some articles about the accounting issues (and the controversy with Apple's decisions)
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1162
http://www.macworld.com/article/131991/2008/02/ipodtouch.html
on another note, I'd bet the SL installer for the upgrade discs checks for a current Leopard installation. for those of you wanting to wipe your disks, I'm guessing Apple deems the erase & install method sufficient for you...