And what's suppose to be the code name for 10.7: Lion, Lynx, Bobcat, Ocelot?
I would agree with this, but tell that to my 1280x800 Macbook. What's more, I find Full Screen to be preferable even when running at 1920x1080. For internet browsing, it allows me to see the maximum amount of content, and when doing work, it prevents me from getting distracted by other things on the computer. Not to mention the Zoom button seems to have a mind of its own at certain times, with the lack of consistency certainly not helping. What I would personally like to see is some sort of Apple-integrated multi-window management system, like what is included in the latest ATi drivers (where you can split your screen(s) into sectors for viewing multiple windows at once or assign programs to a certain space, though the interface is a little messy right now) or even like the side-by-side view of Windows 7.a) The window management in OS X is way better than you think in case you are running a decent display. To put it the other way: What the heck do you need a 'Maximize to screen' button for on a 24" display or above. Therefore you only seem to be using a small screen. Trust me, the green button is very efficient on a large screen and helps avoid clutter.
Does it? The OS X UI requires me to first drag the window to some other place, then move to the lower right corner of the window and resize it. Several mouse movements, several clicks. In Windows: one click, one move. The benefits are in the eye of the beholder.
So? Does that make it "bad" somehow? You're actually willing to defend the OS X 'zoom' button that basically changes behavior with every app?
This: close lid, system enters sleep. After configurable time period in sleep, system enters deep sleep. Result: system wakes up next morning with a battery that's still good to go. My MBA loses enough juice on sleep in one night to require charging the next morning. Nice if you're on the move and forgot to plug it in overnight. It only takes one extra slider in the power options.
Nice attitude. I'd say the two UI's are different - not good or bad. And yes, the Windows UI feels more at home to me and allows me to be more productive when it comes to handling files. As a user, I don't care whether something's a hold over from some past idea. If it works, it works. And I would love to have more preference settings to tailor OS X to my needs.
A solid UI that works is nice. A solid UI that works for me is better.
Comparable example: If you're from the US, you're probably used to driving an automatic. This is kinda how you've been taught things work, bad as those lessons may be. Now if you're stuck in some European stickshift rental car and can barely make it move, would it help if I told you that a stickshift is the more effective, elegant and 'better' solution? The best solution is the one that can cater to both preferences. (In my Audi, that's called a 'tiptronic'.)
Ha, I'm from the UK, drove stick for 20 years, moved to the US, got a nice automatic VW, followed by an even nicer Volvo with the automatic/manual control deal -- never used the manual option, as it offered no benefit, especially in the Bay Area which runs from flat to huge hills in a moment. More user control does not equate to better control.
As far as your other points go, I'm sorry that you'd prefer everyone to use the interface you like, rather than one that actually works for everyone. Be seeing you.
never used the manual option, as it offered no benefit, especially in the Bay Area which runs from flat to huge hills in a moment. More user control does not equate to better control.
I would very much like for Apple to give us the "Classic" Mac OS interface, or at least let us skin the UI to look like it.
As far as your other points go, I'm sorry that you'd prefer everyone to use the interface you like, rather than one that actually works for everyone.
Different approach that's all it is. The reason I like Mac OS X is because it has very simple and light UI and still I can do some pretty cool stuff with it. Tree view is useles for me and column view is far better in my opinion. Right click options can be added using Automator servicesSorting of files and folders differs from person to person, so there is no right way
![]()
Snow Leopard was less than thrilling for me so I hope 10.7 brings something amazing to the table!
Just look at the number of people that download RightZoom to fix the zoom button.
I'm sure he's happy with it, and therefore doesn't need the feature built in to the OS, then.
What's the number?
Actual number of downloads as of January 26th, 2010 is 26,617.
Yeah, i think its fair to say apple missed the mark on properly expanding a window (such a simple process and yet its so badly executed). They also missed the mark on adapting proper SSD support even when they sell a laptop with an SSD. Then theres also the debacle of cut/copy/paste and merge files/folders without overwriting existing files. The list goes on.
Actual number of downloads as of January 26th, 2010 is 26,617.
Yeah, i think its fair to say apple missed the mark on properly expanding a window (such a simple process and yet its so badly executed). They also missed the mark on adapting proper SSD support even when they sell a laptop with an SSD. Then theres also the debacle of cut/copy/paste and merge files/folders without overwriting existing files. The list goes on.
Wait - so you think 26K downloads is a lot?
How many Macs did Apple sell just last quarter ? How many of those downloads are unique ?
Yeah... less than 1% of the Mac using population sure is a lot.The button is fine as is.
Wait - so you think 26K downloads is a lot?
How many Macs did Apple sell just last quarter ? How many of those downloads are unique ?
Yeah... less than 1% of the Mac using population sure is a lot.The button is fine as is.