How in heck do you think it will know if you're a Leopard user or not? It does require you to be a Leopard user.![]()
Your comment, I don't understand it. It's like you're trying to not make sense.
How in heck do you think it will know if you're a Leopard user or not? It does require you to be a Leopard user.![]()
I was able to reproduce this on Leopard.
Did you ever bother to file an issue for this, or have you been quietly waiting for them to notice?
Has every OS X.x release been somewhere in the neighborhood of $29?
Well that's the whole reason I brought it up : to make the point that it has been 7 updates since I filed this as a bug and nothing has changed. Hence my snarky comments about Apple's apparent inability to catch up with reported bugs.Sorry if that wasn't clear.
This is out-of-date; PHP in Snow Leopard is 5.3.0, I don't know about the others.Java 1.6
Python 2.6.1
Ruby 1.8.7.72
Curl (WTF is this?)
Bash 3.2.48(1)
GCC 4.2.1
Perl 5.10.0
PHP 5.2.8
That bug is very entertaining!![]()
I didn't even know it was possible to view in full screen. I love learning something new.
The 950 and x3100 are supported under x64 in Linux and Windows. I doubt Apple would be the ONLY OS to not support it.
I'd say that it is most likely release candidate - as of 10A421a - massive numbers of Mac's weren't booting into 64bit kernel; my laptop has a X3100 GPU that is unsupported hence it falls back into 32bit kernel.
I truly will be pissed off if this is yet another attempt by Apple to screw customers over who have only had their machines for less than a year.
If you're running Leopard: Here's an idiotic usability bug that I filed on 10.5.1. It was quickly flagged as a duplicate. 7 Updates later, nothing has changed...
Try opening a multi-page PDF file and then press Shift-Command-F (for a full-screen slideshow). Now click on the arrow pointing to the right and see if you advance to the next page.
Hint: Now press play, wait till it automatically advances to the next page and then go back. Suddenly the rightward-arrow works.
Gives you real confidence in Apple's ability to catch up with reported bugs. Admittedly this one only limits usability and probably never manages to get high up in Apple's bug priority queue, but still, it makes you wonder...
Remains to be seen, I guess. Preference pane is not a must, the prefs can very well be set within the player. Hopefully they have done it right...
Ask Intel about their POS IGP?...
Well, it's your lucky day because it's working in SL (on the same machine it's broke in Leopard).. great!
They should offer Snow Leopard at $29 for everybody, not just Leopard users.
The whole point of Snow Leopard is all these performance enhancing technologies that developers have to code for. Are developers going to invest the time and money needed to code for these performance technologies that only 20% of Mac users have? Apple needs to aim for near-universal adoption of Snow Leopard in order to make it worthwhile for developers to code for it.
I hope they have quite a few fixes in the pipeline. I was just thinking this week that they have a lot of work to be done on SL before the GM is released. Makes me nervous for how much software will break upon release. I have been using all the builds on my primary machine. Some are much more stable then others. The recent is stable but has lots of issues with 3rd party software crashing on it (pity for adobe, their stuff always breaks first)
The OP's probably referring to the WWDC build which did not have a clean install option, only upgrade in place.
If you're running Leopard: Here's an idiotic usability bug that I filed on 10.5.1. It was quickly flagged as a duplicate. 7 Updates later, nothing has changed...![]()
What's the opposite of an Ignore List? I'm putting you on that.That's fine if you think that. There's nothing wrong with it until you tell people that as fact.
My first impression from the WWDC keynote, when Bertrand said "We want all Leopard users to upgrade because Snow Leopard is the better Leopard", wasn't that the price break was for altruistic reasons, but that for some reason they no longer wish to support 10.5.x., and want to diminish future backlash by reducing financial barriers.That doesn't mean it'll be an upgrade. They're just assuming you've got Leopard on your drive.
If I recall correctly, wasn't the GM of Leopard done just a few weeks prior to the official release? So if SL indeed went GM, maybe we'll see it before September 25. I guess we won't know for sure until Apple official announces it though.
I was eligible for the $9.95 upgrade so I placed my order on June 16th. My visa card shows apple just submitted the charge on August 7th. Read into that as you like, but companies usually don't charge until they are ready to ship
![]()
that's 9.95 + 0.70 tax
It's the Buddy List. Great for Forum Spy too.What's the opposite of an Ignore List? I'm putting you on that.![]()
babyjenniferLB made mention of a 64-bit driver for the GMA 950 but never offered proof.I haven't seen any evidence that they have or will support it. Has anyone seen a build that does? I hope I'm wrong. There will be a few techie whiners like me who will complain that their 2007 Macbook core2duo (only TWO YEARS old, Apple!) won't be supported to run a 64-bit OS that's "64 bit to the kernel".
10.7 is inherently more interesting because we have no idea what it will consists of. I'm sure we'll all be disappointed when our crazy fantasies don't pan out, just like with 10.6.
Can't wait to get it and do a clean install on my MBP. Leopard has been giving me a really hard time lately, it's been quite sluggish. I look forward to the performance improvements.