Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Advice, please...

I've been ready to pull the trigger on a decked out 15" and was waiting for this day with hopes that there would be some kind of upgrade, knowing that the processors aren't ready.

So, for those of you who are more used to this kind of dilemma than I am, would you...

1.) Take the gamble waiting for a new 15" version, knowing that it might not even happen at all this year... the processors are supposed to be ready by end of July, but nobody knows for sure.

2.) Get one of the new 13" versions, fully decked out and save myself a few hundred bucks.

3.) Just buy a fully decked out 15" that is available now and forget today ever happened.

Any advice would be fantastic... thanks!

Get the new 13". It's a legitimately awesome looking and powerful device. You won't miss the screen real estate. You should be looking to dock to a larger monitor for anything you want to do that'd require that space anyway.
 
The revamped 13" MBP has exactly the same processor in the $1299 and the $1499 versions and only a slight bump(but still an i5) in the $1799 version. As it stands now, the only difference in the $1299 and $1499 versions is the size of the storage(128 vs 256). In the past, wasn't there a different processor in each price point with an i7 in the most expensive one and an increase in storage capacity??
 
Advice, please...

I've been ready to pull the trigger on a decked out 15" and was waiting for this day with hopes that there would be some kind of upgrade, knowing that the processors aren't ready.

So, for those of you who are more used to this kind of dilemma than I am, would you...

1.) Take the gamble waiting for a new 15" version, knowing that it might not even happen at all this year... the processors are supposed to be ready by end of July, but nobody knows for sure.

2.) Get one of the new 13" versions, fully decked out and save myself a few hundred bucks.

3.) Just buy a fully decked out 15" that is available now and forget today ever happened.

Any advice would be fantastic... thanks!

I'm in your same exact situation. My old 15" macbook is aging and I was hoping to order a new fully-loaded one today. I am hesitant to get a 13" because I really like as much screen real estate as I can get since I occasionally use final cut. I guess I am leaning towards option 2 since I am hoping the 15" will have a better graphics card. I'm trying to choose between your option 1 or 2 myself, but I don't think I would do #3. I'm interested to hear what other people think...
 
Calm down people. The 15" rMBP is not dead. There are no quad core M CPUs to upgrade to yet.
 
The revamped 13" MBP has exactly the same processor in the $1299 and the $1499 versions and only a slight bump(but still an i5) in the $1799 version. As it stands now, the only difference in the $1299 and $1499 versions is the size of the storage(128 vs 256). In the past, wasn't there a different processor in each price point with an i7 in the most expensive one and an increase in storage capacity??
You can bump this version up to a dual-core i7.

http://store.apple.com/us-k12/buy-mac/macbook-pro?product=MF841LL/A&step=config#
 
The revamped 13" MBP has exactly the same processor in the $1299 and the $1499 versions and only a slight bump(but still an i5) in the $1799 version. As it stands now, the only difference in the $1299 and $1499 versions is the size of the storage(128 vs 256). In the past, wasn't there a different processor in each price point with an i7 in the most expensive one and an increase in storage capacity??

No
 
Calm down people. The 15" rMBP is not dead. There are no quad core M CPUs to upgrade to yet.
True, but, from what I've read, the SOONEST available date for the new processors is end of July or August... that's 6 months away.

For those of us who are ready to buy now out of necessity, it poses a pretty big dilemma.
 
It has that ability. You just need an adapter.

True, but I don't really want a bag-o-adapters to deal with either. But still, I guess if it's that important than I could do it. I wonder if it could drive a large thunderbolt display.
 
For the new rMBP 13", is it worth the upgraded processor from 2.7ghz i5 to either:

1) 2.9 ghz i5 for $100

2) 3.1 ghz i7 for $200

Ready to pull the trigger on this, but unsure if it's even worth the difference for the updated processor.
 
does the lack of thunderbolt port on the new macbook describe the end of the thunderbolt display? Or even thunderbolt as technology?

The lack of Thunderbolt on the new MacBook implies the end of Thunderbolt for mass consumers. Apple has decided (maybe rightly) that only professionals need it or are interested in paying for it.
 
True, but, from what I've read, the SOONEST available date for the new processors is end of July or August... that's 6 months away.

For those of us who are ready to buy now out of necessity, it poses a pretty big dilemma.

It's hardly the end of the world, is it? And it's no reason to justify the "sky is falling on our heads" posts on the first page. I am keen to update my 2012 rMBP. A couple of months will not kill me. They will also not kill you.
 
I get the feeling both the 13" and 15" MacBook Pros are going to get a FULL update by the end of the year. Kinda like they did with the iPad 3 and 4.

I might consider the 12" but that single port worries me. How do you charge AND work with a peripheral when required? Why not add one more port? Hmmm...

Yeah. I doubt they are skipping those in general
Still used by extremely many people as workstation. Power + portability
To me, the new macbook 12" seems like a perfect school computer, but not much more
 
Anyone have any ideas when the 15" MacBook Pro might get Broadwell, too?

I can live without a force touch trackpad, but I'm sitting here ready to buy a high end machine and don't want to drop £1599 on a computer that's not running the latest chips, especially if an update is coming as soon as WWDC.
 
It's hardly the end of the world, is it? And it's no reason to justify the "sky is falling on our heads" posts on the first page. I am keen to update my 2012 rMBP. A couple of months will not kill me. They will also not kill you.
My laptop died... I've been borrowing my wife's $300 Toshiba and also working from my desktop PC for the last month.

So, yes... the next 6 months waiting will surely kill me.

I need to make a decision pretty soon.

----------

Anyone have any ideas when the 15" MacBook Pro might get Broadwell, too?

I can live without a force touch trackpad, but I'm sitting here ready to buy a high end machine and don't want to drop £1599 on a computer that's not running the latest chips, especially if an update is coming as soon as WWDC.
From what I've read, end of July into August is the earliest.
 
In Sweden all 13" rMBP just got a 250$ raise. Anyone else seeing this? Any explanasion as to why it's raised so much here and not at all in the US?
 
Advice, please...

I've been ready to pull the trigger on a decked out 15" and was waiting for this day with hopes that there would be some kind of upgrade, knowing that the processors aren't ready.

So, for those of you who are more used to this kind of dilemma than I am, would you...

1.) Take the gamble waiting for a new 15" version, knowing that it might not even happen at all this year... the processors are supposed to be ready by end of July, but nobody knows for sure.

2.) Get one of the new 13" versions, fully decked out and save myself a few hundred bucks.

3.) Just buy a fully decked out 15" that is available now and forget today ever happened.

Any advice would be fantastic... thanks!

I'm in the same boat. Literally would place an order right now if they had updated the 15" MacBook Pro. Alas, Intel chips weren't ready.
 
Keep in mind that the 13 inch MBP is dual core, and the 15 inch is quad core. This may not matter for some, but people were talking about video editing and such. That will make a difference.
 
I'm in your same exact situation. My old 15" macbook is aging and I was hoping to order a new fully-loaded one today. I am hesitant to get a 13" because I really like as much screen real estate as I can get since I occasionally use final cut. I guess I am leaning towards option 2 since I am hoping the 15" will have a better graphics card. I'm trying to choose between your option 1 or 2 myself, but I don't think I would do #3. I'm interested to hear what other people think...

As someone that owned a both a 15" and 13" Macbook Pro Retina of the Haswell Generation (15" was stolen) I would go with the 13". If you want screen real estate, get an external monitor. The 13" machine is much easier to handle. The battery life difference between them is huge as well. It seemed like the discrete card fired up all the time (even just in Safari) which would cut the run time down to just 5-6 hours.

The only reason to get the 15" is if you must have a quad core processor or the power of the discrete card. Just realize you'll sacrifice the portability. I would personally just rather have a Macbook + iMac.

The new 13" is even better than mine with the faster storage and longer battery life.
 
I do not get why the base rMBP is still 128GB, can you really run an OS with your day to day files in that much space? 256GB maybe, but I would have liked to see the mid-range with 512GB. I am going to have to buy the faster processor when all I want is the storage hike.
 
I'm finding this discussion provoking; I have a 2011 MBP (13"), but really only thought about the Air as my next purchase. I'm clearly easily led, because now I'm interested in checking out the MB12, too!
 
I do not get why the base rMBP is still 128GB, can you really run an OS with your day to day files in that much space? 256GB maybe, but I would have liked to see the mid-range with 512GB. I am going to have to buy the faster processor when all I want is the storage hike.

+1

If it would have had more storage, I would have gone with that and upgraded to 16GB of Ram. I think 8GB simply isn't enough either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.